Research Article

Robust Optimization of Planar Constrained Mechanical System with Varying Joint Clearance Size Based on Sensitivity Analysis

Figure 6

Comparison of the objective function value by solving dynamic equation and Kriging proxy model when different design variables are considered: (a) m1, m2, and C are considered as design variables; (b) m2, m3, and C are considered as design variables; (c) μ1, μ2, and C are considered as design variables; (d) I1, I2, and C are considered as design variables.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)