Horizontal-Vertical-Rocking Coupled Response Analysis of Vertical Seismic Isolated Structure under Near-Fault Earthquakes

Table 1

Near-fault pulse-like record data.

No	Event	Station	Moment magnitude	Rrup	Mechanism
1	Loma Prieta, USA, 1989	Saratoga-Aloha Ave., CMP	6.9	8.5	Reverse	380.89
2	Kocaeli, Turkey, 1999	Izmit, IZT	7.51	7.21	Strike slip	811.00
3	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU089	7.6	8.88	Reverse	671.52
4	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	CHY080	7.6	2.69	Reverse	496.21
5	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU049	7.6	3.76	Reverse	487.27
6	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU051	7.6	7.64	Reverse	350.06
7	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU052	7.6	0.66	Reverse	579.1
8	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU068	7.6	0.32	Reverse	487.34
9	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU075	7.6	0.89	Reverse	573.02
10	Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 1999	TCU076	7.6	2.74	Reverse	614.98
11	Imperial, Valley, 1979	El Centro#4	6.53	7.05	Strike slip	208.91
12	Imperial, Valley, 1979	El Centro#5	6.53	3.95	Strike slip	205.63
13	Imperial, Valley, 1979	El Centro#7	6.53	0.56	Strike slip	201.51
14	Imperial, Valley, 1979	El Centro#10	6.53	8.6	Strike slip	202.85
15	Imperial, Valley, 1979	El centro differential array	6.53	5.09	Strike slip	202.26
16	Loma Prieta, USA, 1989	Los gatos-lexington dam	6.9	5.02	Reverse	1070.32
17	Tabas, Iran, 1978	Tabas	7.35	2.05	Reverse	767.77
18	Northridge, USA, 1994	LA dam	6.7	5.92	Reverse	628.99
19	Northridge, USA, 1994	Pacoima dam (upper left)	6.7	7.01	Reverse	2016.33
20	Kobe, Japan, 1995	KJMA	6.9	0.96	Strike slip	312

Table 1 is reproduced from Dewen Liu et al. 2018.