Comparison of Scaling Ground Motions Using Arithmetic with Logarithm Values for Spectral Matching Procedure

Table 3

Components selected by ASM and LSM methods at the three hazard levels (3-story).

Hazard level	Sequence	ID number	ASM				LSM
			Comp.	SF	SSE	ID number	Comp.	SF	SSE	Relative error (%)
50/50	1	36	TCU042-W	1.26	0.57	17	I-ELC180	1.037	1.256	2.0
	2	15	TCU045-N	0.94	0.64	20	TAF111	2.050	1.378	—
	3	17	I-ELC180	1.02	0.82	36	TCU042-W	1.341	1.440	6.5
	4	5	CCN090	1.40	0.85	5	CCN090	1.406	1.575	0.5
	5	3	BLD090	1.64	0.85	15	TCU045-N	1.044	1.840	11.4
	6	32	STN110	0.80	0.91	3	BLD090	1.854	1.981	12.8
	7	9	TCU047-N	0.91	0.92	32	STN110	1.003	2.222	24.8
10/50	1	18	I-ELC270	2.26	1.54	18	I-ELC270	2.34	1.03	3.9
	2	35	TCU042-N	2.42	1.72	35	TCU042-N	2.55	1.10	5.4
	3	34	SVL360	2.56	2.13	5	CCN090	2.52	1.10	10.0
	4	5	CCN090	2.29	2.26	34	SVL360	2.63	2.03	3.0
	5	15	TCU045-N	1.52	2.31	3	BLD090	3.32	2.08	—
	6	40	YER360	2.52	2.61	20	TAF111	3.67	2.18	—
	7	4	BLD360	3.12	2.89	29	H-CHI012	2.11	2.26	—
2/50	1	30	H-CHI282	3.01	6.01	30	H-CHI282	3.38	1.82	12.3
	2	18	I-ELC270	3.80	6.21	39	YER270	3.13	1.98	0.0
	3	6	CCN360	3.75	6.97	38	TCU107-W	3.84	2.46	2.0
	4	39	YER270	3.13	7.04	27	HCH090	3.44	2.74	11.6
	5	38	TCU107-W	3.77	9.26	22	CHY036-W	2.74	3.44	—
	6	15	TCU045-N	2.55	9.33	10	TCU047-W	2.55	4.52	—
	7	27	HCH090	3.09	9.90	8	CLW-TR	2.39	4.57	—