Local Thickening and Friction Reducing to Constant Resistance in a Prefolded Energy Absorption Device

<table class="table-group" id="tab4"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left"> </td><td class="align_center"><i>P</i><sub>max</sub> (kN)</td><td class="align_center"><i>P</i><sub>mean</sub> (kN)</td><td class="align_center"><i>E</i> (kJ)</td><td class="align_center">SEA (kJ)</td><td class="align_center"><i>S</i><sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">The original</td><td class="align_center">5750</td><td class="align_center">4378</td><td class="align_center">477.2</td><td class="align_center">43.8</td><td class="align_center">3.60 × 10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">New device</td><td class="align_center">5430</td><td class="align_center">5630</td><td class="align_center">1007</td><td class="align_center">96</td><td class="align_center">8.91 × 10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Percentage (new/original)</td><td class="align_center">94%</td><td class="align_center">129%</td><td class="align_center">211%</td><td class="align_center">219%</td><td class="align_center">3%</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="6"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Comparison of the energy absorption effect of original and new energy absorption devices.</div>

Shock and Vibration

tab4

Table 4

Table 4: Local Thickening and Friction Reducing to Constant Resistance in a Prefolded Energy Absorption Device 