Research Article
Mass Laplacian Discriminant Analysis and Its Application in Gear Fault Diagnosis
Table 3
Recognition rate under different distance coefficient
.
| Different coefficient | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
| Original signal recognition rate (%) | 67.29 | 66.46 | 70.21 | 64.58 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 67.29 | 74.17 | 65.83 | 67.71 | Signal recognition rate after noise reduction (%) | 86.67 | 86.94 | 87.22 | 87.78 | 78.89 | 87.5 | 85 | 87.5 | 87.78 | 91.11 | Distance coefficient | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 1.15 | Original signal recognition rate (%) | 65.42 | 65.21 | 69.37 | 76.04 | 64.17 | 65.63 | 65.63 | 66.46 | 56.46 | 63.96 | Signal recognition rate after noise reduction (%) | 91.94 | 87.78 | 88.06 | 87.22 | 87.78 | 88.06 | 87.5 | 54.44 | 58.06 | 68.06 |
|
|