Research Article

Structural Modal Analysis and Optimization of SUV Door Based on Response Surface Method

Table 4

FCCD of the fifth-order modal frequencies to design variables.

No.Thickness of vehicle door panelResponse y (Hz) (%)
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)FEMRSM

10.51.20.50.649.5449.680.28
20.51.20.51.050.7350.62−0.21
30.51.20.80.649.4649.590.26
40.51.20.81.050.6850.59−0.19
50.51.60.50.650.8650.79−0.13
60.51.60.51.051.8651.870.03
70.51.60.80.650.7850.70−0.16
80.51.60.81.051.8151.830.05
90.91.20.50.656.3356.350.03
100.91.20.51.056.6556.730.14
110.91.20.80.656.2456.19−0.09
120.91.20.81.056.5556.620.13
130.91.60.50.658.6958.800.19
140.91.60.51.059.4859.32−0.27
150.91.60.80.658.5558.640.16
160.91.60.81.059.3159.21−0.17
170.71.40.60.855.3455.370.06
180.51.40.60.850.9150.950.08
190.91.40.60.858.0457.99−0.09
200.71.20.60.854.4954.31−0.33
210.71.60.60.855.9956.160.30
220.71.40.50.855.3855.36−0.04
230.71.40.80.855.2555.260.02
240.71.40.60.655.2454.95−0.52
250.71.40.61.055.4355.700.49