Research Article
Structural Modal Analysis and Optimization of SUV Door Based on Response Surface Method
Table 4
FCCD of the fifth-order modal frequencies to design variables.
| No. | Thickness of vehicle door panel | Response y (Hz) | (%) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | FEM | RSM |
| 1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 49.54 | 49.68 | 0.28 | 2 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.73 | 50.62 | −0.21 | 3 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 49.46 | 49.59 | 0.26 | 4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 50.68 | 50.59 | −0.19 | 5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 50.86 | 50.79 | −0.13 | 6 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 51.86 | 51.87 | 0.03 | 7 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 50.78 | 50.70 | −0.16 | 8 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 51.81 | 51.83 | 0.05 | 9 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 56.33 | 56.35 | 0.03 | 10 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 56.65 | 56.73 | 0.14 | 11 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 56.24 | 56.19 | −0.09 | 12 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 56.55 | 56.62 | 0.13 | 13 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 58.69 | 58.80 | 0.19 | 14 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 59.48 | 59.32 | −0.27 | 15 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 58.55 | 58.64 | 0.16 | 16 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 59.31 | 59.21 | −0.17 | 17 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 55.34 | 55.37 | 0.06 | 18 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 50.91 | 50.95 | 0.08 | 19 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 58.04 | 57.99 | −0.09 | 20 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 54.49 | 54.31 | −0.33 | 21 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 55.99 | 56.16 | 0.30 | 22 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 55.38 | 55.36 | −0.04 | 23 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 55.25 | 55.26 | 0.02 | 24 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 55.24 | 54.95 | −0.52 | 25 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 55.43 | 55.70 | 0.49 |
|
|