Research Article
Energy and Fatigue Damage Evolution of Sandstone under Different Cyclic Loading Frequencies
Table 1
Parameters for different rocks tested.
| Groups | Specimen | D (mm) | L (mm) | M (G) | ρ (g·cm−3) | Average density (g·cm−3) | Loading mode |
| 1 | U1 | 50.10 | 99.84 | 520.3 | 2.645 | 2.630 | Uniaxial compression | U2 | 49.42 | 100.02 | 502.1 | 2.618 | Uniaxial compression | U3 | 48.82 | 99.78 | 490.4 | 2.627 | Uniaxial compression | 2 | CF1-1 | 49.02 | 100.3 | 499.8 | 2.6403 | 2.6228 | Cyclic loading | CF1-2 | 50.04 | 100.9 | 512.3 | 2.5817 | Cyclic loading | CF1-3 | 48.96 | 99.5 | 495.7 | 2.6462 | Cyclic loading | 3 | CF2-1 | 48.24 | 99.9 | 474.9 | 2.6010 | 2.6168 | Cyclic loading | CF2-2 | 49.64 | 100.12 | 510.6 | 2.6352 | Cyclic loading | CF2-3 | 49.18 | 99.86 | 495.9 | 2.6142 | Cyclic loading | 4 | CF3-1 | 48.44 | 100.2 | 487.2 | 2.6384 | 2.6374 | Cyclic loading | CF3-2 | 49.96 | 99.84 | 513.8 | 2.6252 | Cyclic loading | CF3-3 | 49.12 | 99.54 | 499.6 | 2.6486 | Cyclic loading |
|
|