Shock and Vibration

Shock and Vibration / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6666843 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6666843

Yang Zheng, Jiayin Wu, Ming Xu, "Random Response and Crossing Rate of Fractional Order Nonlinear System with Impact", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2021, Article ID 6666843, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6666843

Random Response and Crossing Rate of Fractional Order Nonlinear System with Impact

Academic Editor: Davood Younesian
Received03 Dec 2020
Accepted20 May 2021
Published27 May 2021

Abstract

The random response and mean crossing rate of the fractional order nonlinear system with impact are investigated through the equivalent nonlinearization technique. The random additive excitation is Gaussian white noise, while the impact is described by a phenomenological model, which is developed from the actual impact process experiments. Based on the equivalent nonlinearization technique, one class of random nonlinear system with exact probability density function (PDF) solution of response is selected. The criterion of the appropriate equivalent nonlinear system is the similarity with the original system on the damping, stiffness, and inertia. The more similar, the higher the precision. The optimal unknown parameters of the equivalent random nonlinear system in the damping and stiffness terms are determined by the rule of smallest mean-square difference. In the view of equivalent nonlinearization technique, the response of the original system is the same as that of the equivalent system with the optimal unknown parameters in analytical solution manner. Then, the mean crossing rate is derived from stationary PDF. The consistence between the results from proposed technique and Monte Carlo simulation reveals the accuracy of the proposed analytical procedure.

1. Introduction

The impact can be found frequently in the structural and mechanical engineering, where there exists clearance between two bodies [1, 2]. Due to the discontinuity, the dynamical behavior of the vibration system comprising impact is different from the usual smooth system and becomes extremely complex [35]. The impact process is usually modeled as a velocity jump at the time of impact occurring, which is expressed by with . The rebound velocity equals to r by impact velocity and has an opposite direction of movement. The mapping of the velocity before and after impact is not continuous both in the size and orientation. Many research studies are devoted to reveal the dynamical behaviors of vibro-impact system [6, 7]. To deal with the velocity jump at collision moment, several effective transformations of state variables are always helpful [79]. Based on these transformations, the vibro-impact system with viscoelastic damping and nonzero offset barrier is studied by the stochastic averaging [10]. Multivalue response of a nonlinear vibro-impact system under narrow-band excitation is investigated [11]. The triple-valued response under a certain case is observed, which may have two or four steady-state solutions. Other research studies with respect to the vibro-impact system can be found in [1215].

Based on the impact experiments of elastic-plastic structures, a phenomenological impact model is developed. Due to time duration of the elastic-plastic deformation process, the impact model of the velocity jump at collision moment is not appropriate in this case [16, 17]. By using this phenomenological impact model, the stochastic averaging method has been adopted to obtain the stationary probability density function (PDF) of the vibro-impact system subjected to Gaussian white noises [18]. Due to the limitation on slight nonlinearity and weak excitations density, the equivalent nonlinearization technique has a remarkable advantage, i.e., it can be applicable to systems which are strongly nonlinearity. This technique has been developed and used to complex nonlinear system in Hamiltonian framework [1923]. Considering the significant advantage, the equivalent nonlinearization technique has been successfully adopted to evaluate the reliability and the reliability-based design of inelastic structure, and a simple equivalent nonlinear system that retains the dynamic characteristics of the first two modes and the global yielding behavior has been developed to replace the original system [24]. It can be expected that the equivalent nonlinearization technique is applicable to deal with the random system-incorporated inelastic impact described by the phenomenological impact model.

Besides, the mean crossing rate, which always relates to predicting the extreme response statistics and the system reliability, is another important quantity which should be considered. The evaluation of the mean crossing rate has been of great interest among researchers. Naess and Karlsen [25] calculated the level crossing rate of second-order stochastic Volterra systems. Naess et al. [26] applied Monte Carlo simulation to predict the extreme response statistic of floating offshore structures subjected to random seas. Beck and Melchers [27] investigated time variant reliability of uncertain structure by using the ensemble crossing rate. As illustrated in [28], the mean crossing rate for a stationary stochastic process can be determined by the joint probability density of the stochastic process and its derivative process. It means that the equivalent nonlinearization technique is applicable to derive not only the system response but also the mean crossing rate.

The random response and mean crossing rate of the nonlinear system with fractional order stiffness and impact are studied by using the equivalent nonlinearization technique. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the fractional order nonlinear system with impact is established and the impact model is described. In Section 3, an equivalent nonlinearization technique is adopted and the approximate solution of system response is derived. In Section 4, the mean crossing rate is introduced and the analytical formula is expressed by the response PDF of system. In Section 5, examples are given to shown the proposed analytical technique and different system parameters are discussed. The conclusions are drawn in Section 6.

2. Fractional Order Nonlinear System with Impact

The present paper is concerned with a vibro-impact system with right-side barrier under additive excitations described by Gaussian white noise, as shown in Figure 1. The motion equation governing the mechanical behavior of the system iswhere is the system displacement and overhead dot indicates differentiation with respect to time , is the viscous damping coefficient, and is Gaussian white noise in sense of Stratonovitch [29] with zero mean and correlation function .

The system stiffness here is fractional order nonlinear. The physical value is larger than 1 and not an integer for many materials due to the nonlinear stress-strain relationship [30]. This nonlinear stiffness has been studied by Cvetivanin and Zukuvic [31, 32]. In Figure 1, we consider the elastic force obeys the fractional order law. and in system (1) are the linear and nonlinear coefficients, respectively. Specially, parameter can be positive for a beam, while negative for a beam with sufficient axial load [33].

Impact force , which depends on both the velocity and displacement, is governed by the phenomenological impact model when collision occurs [17]. This impact model is efficient to describe the collision for the elastic-plastic materials. The distance of clearance between the mass and barrier is .

The impact force will be given for two different cases (the dissipative collision and the conservative collision), respectively. The criterion to distinguish the dissipative and conservative collision is the relation of the maximal right-side displacement of the impact mass and the elastic limit . The dissipative collision for , while conservative collision for

2.1. For Dissipative Collision

The impact force can be explicitly derived for the loading phase and unloading phase as follows:withwhere are material parameters that are determined through experiments, is the plastic deformation induced by the dissipative impact, and represent the stiffness coefficients of the loading phase and unloading phase, respectively, and represents the maximal left-side displacement of the impact mass. The relation of impact force versus relative displacement for dissipative collision is depicted in Figure 2.

2.2. For Conservative Collision

The impact force becomes simple and only depends on the system displacement. The impact forces can be written as

3. Equivalent Nonlinearization Technique

As mentioned above, the equivalent nonlinearization technique has some advantages compared with the stochastic averaging technique, especially for the effectiveness to the strong nonlinearity and its concision. To utilize the equivalent nonlinearization technique, the first and critical step is the selection of the equivalent nonlinear system family. The original system solution is approximately expressed by that of the equivalent system family. The more similar, the higher the accuracy. There are no rigorous rules for selecting the equivalent system family. General speaking, an efficient rule is to make inertia, stiffness, and damping of the original and equivalent system close. The above rules, which confine the selection of the equivalent nonlinear system, guarantee the accuracy of the results from the equivalent nonlinearization technique.

The phenomenological impact model is depicted for two different cases. In the conservative collision case, the loading path coincides with the unloading path, while in the dissipative collision case, the loading path is deviated from the unloading path beyond the elastic limit and the nonzero area encircled by the two paths indicates the dissipative mechanism of the inelastic impact. In other words, in case of the dissipative collision case, the impact is not only to store the potential energy due to its elasticity but also to dissipate energy as a damping. So, in the selection of the equivalent nonlinear system family, the conservative and dissipative components of inelastic impact should be considered.

It is reasonable to reflect the conservative component of inelastic impact based on the loading path:

In the case of the conservative collision, equation (5) is the exact expression of the impact process, but it is not suitable for the dissipation collision. In order to reflect the inconsistency of loading and unloading paths, one intuitive and convenient selection of equivalent stiffness to reflect the conservative component of inelastic impact is , in which is a correction coefficient.

Obviously, the linear damping is the simplest reflection of the dissipative component of the inelastic impact, but is not appropriate since the dissipative component will not play a role in conservative collision and depend on the system state in dissipative collision. To avoid the irrationality of linear damping, quasi-linear damping with damping coefficient depending on the system states is a good alternative and can be selected as , where and the potential energy . The selection of has two remarkable advantages: (i) due to the similar properties between the impact process and hysteretic behavior [34], can reflect the dissipative component well and (ii) the solvability of the equivalent nonlinear system including is guaranteed.

Based on the above analysis, the original system is replaced by the nonlinear system family,which has the stationary PDF with normalization constant as

In equivalent nonlinear system (6), the constant and the function are both unknown and should be determined through some criterions. Unfortunately, to derive the optimal function is almost impossible. A practical way is to expand the function in a power series:where denotes the system energy critical value of elastic impact and inelastic impact, i.e., , and are undetermined constant parameters. Now, the equivalent system of the original system comes down to determine unknown parameters and .

The criterion of minimizing the mean-square value is selected to derive the unknown parameters and , where and is the expectation operator. Thus, the optimal parameters can be solved from the following equations:

Because of the infinite number of , equation (9) is unsolvable and should be truncated. If only is kept and are ignored, parameters and can be solved from equation (9) and can be written aswhere represents Heaviside step function.

In equations (9) and (10), the joint PDF depends on the unknown parameters and , so the undetermined parameters and should be obtained through iterative technique.

4. Stochastic Response and Mean Crossing Rate Evaluation

As discussed in the above section, by substituting the parameters into the PDF in equation (7), the joint PDF of the original system can be approximated to that of the equivalent system. Then, the PDF of original system states and , the marginal PDF, can be written directly.

Except the stochastic responses analysis, another quantity of particular importance is the mean crossing rate, which associates with the extreme response prediction, system safety, and reliability. The mean crossing rate, denoted as , can be described as the mean number of a stochastic process crossing a critical value per unit time. The mean crossing rate which usually depends on the time except is a stationary stochastic process. Particularly, in the special case of which is a mean-square differentiable stationary stochastic process with continuous time and state, the mean crossing rate of can be defined as [28, 35]where is independent of the time and represents the critical excursion value of system displacement, , in which is the stationary joint probability density of stochastic variances and . Similar to the mean crossing rate, the mean up-crossing and down-crossing rates, which represent the mean number of a stochastic process up-crossing and down-crossing a critical value of system displacement per unit time, respectively, can be defined as

Since is an even function of stochastic variance , the mean up-crossing and down-crossing rate satisfies

Considering the relation in equation (13), only the mean up-crossing rate is discussed in this paper.

5. Numerical Results and Discussion

Some numerical calculations are carried out to validate the proposed analytical technique. System parameters are selected as , , and [17], unless otherwise mentioned. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) relate the displacement PDF and the velocity PDF under different fractional orders . It can be clearly seen that the analytical results (solid lines) agree with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) results of the original system (1) (circles). As the fractional order increases from to and , the displacement PDF is to be more flat and the velocity PDF is slightly changed. It means that the displacement is sensitive to the fractional order , while the velocity is not. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) plot the displacement and velocity PDFs of the nonlinear system under different Gaussian white noise intensities . The bigger intensity means large displacement and velocity response, which is consistent with our intuition. The influences of the nonlinear stiffness coefficients are shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b). The high nonlinear stiffness restricts the system displacement response. However, such restriction has little effects on the velocity response, where the curves of the velocity PDF almost coincide. Then, the bistable system () is studied. The displacement and velocity PDFs of the nonlinear system under different fractional order is given in Figures 6(a) and 6(b). The displacement PDF has two peaks, while velocity PDF only has one peak. The system with small fractional order (i.e., ) has a flat PDF. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) are the curves of the displacement and velocity PDFs. The responses increases with the increased excitation intensity . The influences of the nonlinear stiffness coefficients on the displacement and velocity PDFs are shown in Figures 8(a) and 8(b). Strong nonlinear stiffness coefficient reduces the displacement response.

Besides the system responses, the mean up-crossing rate plays an important role in the system reliability. Figure 9 gives relation of the mean up-crossing rate and the critical value of excursion and fractional order . The results from the proposed technique agrees well with those from the Monte Carlo simulation(MCS). To give a clear view, Figure 10 plots the curve of the mean up-crossing rate with critical value of excursion under . The mean up-crossing rage monotonously decrease with the excursion . The mean up-crossing rate of the bistable system is plotted in Figures 11 and 12. The mean up-crossing rate increases first and then decreases with the increased critical value of excursion . The comparison between the proposed technique and the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) shows that the accuracy is not high, but acceptable. These can be clearly observed in Figure 12, where the fractional order equals to 5.5.

6. Conclusions

The random response and mean crossing rate of the nonlinear system with fractional order stiffness and impact has been investigated through equivalent nonlinearization technique. The impact is described by an empirical model developed from impact experiment of elastic and plastic materials. By using the equivalent nonlinearization technique, the original vibro-impact system is equivalently replaced by a nonlinear system. Through minimizing the mean-square value of the system difference, one optimal system is chosen from the equivalent nonlinear system family. Then, the joint PDF of system displacement and velocity are analytically obtained through the equivalent nonlinear system. The agreement between the analytical results and MCS validates effectiveness of the proposed technique. The proposed technique is also adopted to derive the mean crossing rate of the vibro-impact system, and the acceptable precision of the results illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed technique to evaluate the mean crossing rate. It is necessary to emphasize that, in comparison with the stochastic averaging technique, the present technique can extend the applicable range of system parameters to which the stochastic averaging technique is invalid.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. W. Goldsmith, Impact: The Theory and Physical Behavior of Colliding Solids, Edward Arnold, London, UK, 1960.
  2. R. A. Ibrahim, Vibro-Impact Dynamics:Modeling, Mapping and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
  3. S. H. Crandall and W. D. Mark, Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1963.
  4. A. Hosseinkhani, D. Younesian, and S. Farhangdoust, “Dynamic analysis of a plate on the generalized foundation with fractional damping subjected to random excitation,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 3908371, 10 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Younesian, A. Hosseinkhani, H. Askari, and E. Esmailzadeh, “Elastic and viscoelastic foundations: a review on linear and nonlinear vibration modeling and applications,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 853–895, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. F. Dimentberg and D. V. Iourtchenko, “Random vibrations with impacts: a review,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 2–4, pp. 229–254, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. P. Ivanov, Dynamics of Systems with Mechanical Impacts, International Education Program, Moscow, Russia, 1997.
  8. M. F. Dimentberg and A. I. Menyailov, “Response of a single-mass vibroimpact system to white-noise random excitation,” ZAMM-Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 709–716, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. F. Zhuravlev, “A method for analyzing vibration-impact systems by means of special functions,” Mechanics of Solids, vol. 11, pp. 23–27, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  10. D. Wang, W. Xu, X. Gu, and Y. Yang, “Stationary response analysis of vibro-impact system with a unilateral nonzero offset barrier and viscoelastic damping under random excitations,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 891–909, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Huang, W. Xu, D. Liu, and Q. Han, “Multi-valued responses of a nonlinear vibro-impact system excited by random narrow-band noise,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2907–2920, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. I. Babitsky, in Theory of Vibroimpact Systems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1978.
  13. Z. L. Huang, Z. H. Liu, and W. Q. Zhu, “Stationary response of multi-degree-of-freedom vibro-impact systems under white noise excitations,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 275, no. 1-2, pp. 223–240, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H.-S. Jing and K.-C. Sheu, “Exact stationary solutions of the random response of a single-degree-of-freedom vibro-impact system,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 363–373, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. S. Namachchivaya and J. H. Park, “Stochastic dynamics of impact oscillators,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 862–870, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. X. Lu and T. X. Yu, Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  17. K. Q. Wu and T. X. Yu, “Simple dynamic models of elastic-plastic structures under impact,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 735–754, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Xu, Y. Wang, X. L. Jin, Z. L. Huang, and T. X. Yu, “Random response of vibro-impact systems with inelastic contact,” International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, vol. 52, pp. 26–31, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Cavaleri, M. D. Paola, and G. Failla, “Some properties of multi-degree-of-freedom potential systems and application to statistical equivalent non-linearization,” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 405–421, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. Q. Zhu and M. L. Deng, “Equivalent non-linear system method for stochastically excited and dissipated integrable Hamiltonian systems-resonant case,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 274, no. 3–5, pp. 1110–1122, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. Q. Zhu, Z. L. Huang, and Y. Suzuki, “Equivalent non-linear system method for stochastically excited and dissipated partially integrable Hamiltonian systems,” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 773–786, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. W. Q. Zhu and Y. Lei, “Equivalent nonlinear system method for stochastically excited and dissipated integrable Hamiltonian systems,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 64, p. 1997, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. Q. Zhu, T. T. Soong, and Y. Lei, “Equivalent nonlinear system method for stochastically excited Hamiltonian systems,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 618–623, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. W. Han and Y. K. Wen, “Method of reliability-based seismic design. I: equivalent nonlinear systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 256–263, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Naess and H. C. Karlsen, “Numerical calculation of the level crossing rate of second order stochastic Volterra systems,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 155–160, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Naess, O. Gaidai, and P. S. Teigen, “Extreme response prediction for nonlinear floating offshore structures by Monte Carlo simulation,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 221–230, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. T. Beck and R. E. Melchers, “On the ensemble crossing rate approach to time variant reliability analysis of uncertain structures,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 9–19, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Q. Zhu, Random Vibration, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1992.
  29. Y. K. Lin and G. Q. Cai, Probabilistic Structural Dynamics: Advanced Theory and Application, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  30. C. A. K. Kwuimy, G. Litak, and C. Nataraj, “Nonlinear analysis of energy harvesting systems with fractional order physical properties,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 80, pp. 491–501, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Cveticanin, “Oscillator with fraction order restoring force,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 320, no. 4-5, pp. 1064–1077, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Cveticanin and M. Zukovic, “Melnikov’s criteria and chaos in systems with fractional order deflection,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 326, no. 3–5, pp. 768–779, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. V. V. Bolotin, The Dynamic Stability of Elastic Systems, Holden-Day, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1964.
  34. Z. G. Ying, W. Q. Zhu, Y. Q. Ni, and J. M. Ko, “Stochastic averaging of duhem hysteretic systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 91–104, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. Middleton, An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1960.

Copyright © 2021 Yang Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views60
Downloads266
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.