Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Tuberculosis Research and Treatment
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 215059, 14 pages
Research Article

Gender-Related Barriers and Delays in Accessing Tuberculosis Diagnostic and Treatment Services: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

1Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
2Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
3Center for Clinical Global Health Education, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 540B, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

Received 12 January 2014; Accepted 10 April 2014; Published 11 May 2014

Academic Editor: Edward A. Graviss

Copyright © 2014 Lakshmi Krishnan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background. Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global public health problem with known gender-related (male versus female) disparities. We reviewed the qualitative evidence (written/spoken narrative) for gender-related differences limiting TB service access from symptom onset to treatment initiation. Methods. Following a systematic process, we searched 12 electronic databases, included qualitative studies that assessed gender differences in accessing TB diagnostic and treatment services, abstracted data, and assessed study validity. Using a modified “inductive coding” system, we synthesized emergent themes within defined barriers and delays limiting access at the individual and provider/system levels and examined gender-related differences. Results. Among 13,448 studies, 28 studies were included. All were conducted in developing countries and assessed individual-level barriers; 11 (39%) assessed provider/system-level barriers, 18 (64%) surveyed persons with suspected or diagnosed TB, and 7 (25%) exclusively surveyed randomly sampled community members or health care workers. Each barrier affected both genders but had gender-variable nature and impact reflecting sociodemographic themes. Women experienced financial and physical dependence, lower general literacy, and household stigma, whereas men faced work-related financial and physical barriers and community-based stigma. Conclusions. In developing countries, barriers limiting access to TB care have context-specific gender-related differences that can inform integrated interventions to optimize TB services.