Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
Volume 3, Pages 593-608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.46
Mini-Review Article

Planning and Representing Intentional Action

Department of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, NL-2333 XZ Leiden, The Netherlands

Academic Editor: Pia Tudela

Copyright © 2003 Bernhard Hommel.

Citations to this Article [32 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Bernhard Hommel, “Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 494–500, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Douglas G. Stuart, “Integration of posture and movement: Contributions of Sherrington, Hess, and Bernstein,” Human Movement Science, vol. 24, no. 5-6, pp. 621–643, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Armin Kibele, “Non-consciously controlled decision making for fast motor reactions in sports-A priming approach for motor responses to non-consciously perceived movement features,” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 591–610, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bernhard Hommel, Joan López-Moliner, and Elisabet Tubau, “Modes of executive control in sequence learning: From stimulus-based to plan-based control,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 43–63, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Gianluca Baldassarre, Martin V. Butz, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Giovanni Pezzulo, and Joachim Hoffmann, “From actions to goals and vice-versa: Theoretical analysis and models of th e ideomotor principle and TOTE,” Anticipatory Behavior In Adaptive Learning Systems: From Brains To Individu, vol. 4520, pp. 73–93, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Giovanni Pezzulo, “Coordinating with the future: The anticipatory nature of representation,” Minds and Machines, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 179–225, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ad W. Smitsman, and Ralf F.A. Cox, “Towards an embodiment of goals,” Theory and Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 317–339, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ralf Cox, and Ad Smitsman, “Perseveration in tool use: A window for understanding the dynamics of the action-selection process,” Infancy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 249–269, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Stephanie D. Preston, and R. Brent Stansfield, “I know how you feel: Task-irrelevant facial expressions are spontaneously processed at a semantic level,” Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sanne De Wit, Mike R. Aitken, Anthony Dickinson, Paul C. Fletcher, and Philip R. Corlett, “Differential engagement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex by goal-directed and habitual behavior toward food pictures in humans,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 36, pp. 11330–11338, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sanne De Wit, and Anthony Dickinson, “Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: A case for animal-human translational models,” Psychological Research, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 463–476, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ad W. Smitsman, and Daniela Corbetta, “Action in Infancy - Perspectives, Concepts, and Challenges,” The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Infant Development, pp. 167–203, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Amotz Perlman, Darren J. Edwards, Joseph Tzelgov, and Emmanuel M. Pothos, “Task-relevant chunking in sequence learning,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 649–661, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • E.J. Capaldi, Yun Kyoung Shin, and Robert W. Proctor, “A Review of Contemporary Ideomotor Theory,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 943–974, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Pim Haselager, Sebo Uithol, Iris van Rooij, and Harold Bekkering, “Understanding motor resonance,” Social Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 388–397, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christel Bidet-Ildei, Jean Pierre Orliaguet, and Yann Coello, “The role of motor representation in visual perception of human movement,” Annee Psychologique, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 409–445, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marco Mazzone, “Intentions as Complex Entities,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 767–783, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sanne Wit, K. Richard Ridderinkhof, Paul C. Fletcher, and Anthony Dickinson, “Resolution of outcome-induced response conflict by humans after extended training,” Psychological Research, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Richard P. Cooper, Nicolas Ruh, and Denis Mareschal, “The Goal Circuit Model: A Hierarchical Multi-Route Model of the Acquisition and Control of Routine Sequential Action in Humans,” Cognitive Science, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paul Crease, and Tumasch Reichenbacher, “Linking Time Geography and Activity Theory to Support the Activities of Mobile Information Seekers,” Transactions in GIS, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 507–525, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marco Mazzone, and Emanuela Campisi, “Distributed intentionality: A model of intentional behavior in humans,” Philosophical Psychology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 267–290, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • M. A. Spiegel, D. Koester, and T. Schack, “The Functional Role of Working Memory in the (Re-)Planning and Execution of Grasping Movements,” Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1326–1339, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Holly Andersen, “The Representation of Time in Agency,” A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, pp. 470–485, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ralf F. A. Cox, and Fred Hasselman, “The Case of Watson vs. James: Effect-Priming Studies Do Not Support Ideomotor Theory,” Plos One, vol. 8, no. 1, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • John M. Huhn, Kimberly A. Schimpf, and Robrecht P. van der Wel, “Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation,” Experimental Brain Research, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marco Mazzone, “Pragmatics and mindreading: Forward and backward inferences in shared intentional contexts,” Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 289–307, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Joachim Hoffmann, Johannes Engelkamp, and Joachim Hoffmann, “Erwerb willkürlichen, zielgerichteten Verhaltens beim Menschen,” Lern- und Gedächtnispsychologie, pp. 41–75, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ivaylo Borislavov Iotchev, and Hein Thomas van Schie, “When a Model becomes the Real Thing: A Neuro-Cognitive Account of ‘Demonic’ Possession,” Medical Hypotheses, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marco Mazzone, “Chapter 12. Why don’t you tell it explicitly?,” Implicitness, vol. 276, pp. 259–279, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sanne de Wit, “Control of Behaviour by Competing Learning Systems,” The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control, pp. 190–206, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Denis Ebbesen, and Jeppe Olsen, “Motor Intention/Intentionality and Associationism - A conceptual review,” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Poppy Watson, Reinout W. Wiers, Bernhard Hommel, and Sanne de Wit, “Motivational sensitivity of outcome-response priming: Experimental research and theoretical models,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar