Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
Volume 3 (2003), Pages 75-86
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.03
Research Article

Inhibition of Return Biases Orienting During the Search of Complex Scenes

Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Academic Editor: Michael Posner

Copyright © 2003 W. Joseph Macinnes and Raymond M. Klein.

Citations to this Article [45 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Amy C. MacPherson, Raymond M. Klein, and Chris Moore, “Inhibition of return in children and adolescents,” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 337–351, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ms Peterson, Wr Boot, Js McCarley, and Af Kramer, “Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 854–861, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • I Juricevic, Rm Klein, J Pratt, Bm Gibson, and Sj Shettleworth, “Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons,” Learning & Behavior, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 296–308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Raymond M. Klein, and Kristie Dukewich, “Does the inspector have a memory?,” Visual Cognition, vol. 14, no. 4-8, pp. 648–667, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ranxiao F. Wang, Jason S. McCarley, David E. Irwin, Matthew S. Peterson, Walter R. Boot, and Arthur F. Kramer, “Oculomotor behaviour in visual search for multiple targets,” Visual Cognition, vol. 14, no. 4-8, pp. 685–703, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Anne B. Sereno, Kevin A. Briand, Cameron B. Jeter, and Vani Pariyadath, “Dissociating sensory and motor components of inhibition of return,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 6, pp. 862–887, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Arthur F. Kramer, Jason S. McCarley, Walter R. Boot, Matthew S. Peterson, Angela Colcombe, and Charles T. Scialfa, “Aging, memory and visual search,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 288–304, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Juan Lupiáñez, Raymond M. Klein, and Paolo Bartolomeo, “Inhibition of return: Twenty years after,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1003–1014, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Michael S. Ambinder, Brian Levinthal, James A. Crowell, Alejandro Lleras, Ranyiao Frances Wang, David E. Irwin, Daniel J. Simons, Brendon Hsieh, Laura E. Thomas, and Arthur F. Kramer, “Fruitful visual search: Inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 891–895, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Derrick G. Watson, Elizabeth A. Maylor, and Lucy A. M. Bruce, “The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting,” Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception And Performance, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1389–1399, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Gabriele Gratton, Alejandro Lleras, Eunsam Shin, Xiaoang I. Wan, and Monica Fabiani, “Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials,” Psychophysiology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 804–811, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Alejandro Lleras, Jun-Ichiro Kawahara, Xiaoang Irene Wan, and Atsunori Ariga, “Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search,” Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 114–131, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Raymond Klein, “Canadian laboratories / Laboratoires canadiens on the control of attention,” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 240–252, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Laura E. Thomas, and Alejandro Lleras, “Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search,” Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1241–1250, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Zhiguo Wang, and Raymond M. Klein, “Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: A review,” Vision Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 220–228, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tim J. Smith, and John M. Henderson, “Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search?,” Attention Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 2384–2398, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tim J. Smith, and John M. Henderson, “Looking back at Waldo: Oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations,” Journal Of Vision, vol. 11, no. 1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tim J. Smith, and John M. Henderson, “Looking back at Waldo: Oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations,” Journal of Vision, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Raymond M. Klein, John Christie, and Eric P. Morris, “Vector averaging of inhibition of return,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 295–300, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Zhiguo Wang, and Jan Theeuwes, “Dissociable Spatial and Temporal Effects of Inhibition of Return,” Plos One, vol. 7, no. 8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthew D. Hilchey, Raymond M. Klein, and Jason Ivanoff, “Perceptual and motor inhibition of return: components or flavors?,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 1416–1429, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Matthew D. Hilchey, Raymond M. Klein, Jason Satel, and Zhiguo Wang, “Oculomotor inhibition of return: How soon is it “recoded” into spatiotopic coordinates?,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1145–1153, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Zhiguo Wang, Jason Satel, and Raymond M. Klein, “Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 441–453, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Solmaz Shariat Torbaghan, Daniel Yazdi, Koorosh Mirpour, and James W. Bisley, “Inhibition of return in a visual foraging task in non-human subjects,” Vision Research, vol. 74, pp. 2–9, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • C.D. Cowper-Smith, G.A. Eskes, and D.A. Westwood, “Saccadic inhibition of return can arise from late-stage execution processes,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 531, no. 2, pp. 120–124, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • John M. Henderson, and Steven G. Luke, “Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1101–1107, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • C. D. Cowper-Smith, and D. A. Westwood, “Motor IOR revealed for reaching,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Frank K. Hu, Zhiwei Fan, Arthur G. Samuel, and ShuChang He, “Effects of display complexity on location and feature inhibition,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Steven G. Luke, Joseph Schmidt, and John M. Henderson, “Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hannah M. Krueger, and Amelia R. Hunt, “Inhibition of Return Across Eye and Object Movements: The Role of Prediction,” Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception And Performance, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 735–744, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • C.D. Cowper-Smith, G.A. Eskes, and D.A. Westwood, “Motor inhibition of return can affect prepared reaching movements,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 541, pp. 83–86, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christopher D. Cowper-Smith, Jonathan Harris, Gail A. Eskes, and David A. Westwood, “Spatial Interactions between Successive Eye and Arm Movements: Signal Type Matters,” Plos One, vol. 8, no. 3, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kate M. Thompson, Jeff P. Hamm, and Tracy L. Taylor, “Effects of memory instruction on attention and information processing: Further investigation of inhibition of return in item-method directed forgetting,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • W. Joseph MacInnes, Hannah M. Krüger, and Amelia R. Hunt, “Just passing through? Inhibition of return in saccadic sequences,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, pp. 1–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • W. Joseph MacInnes, Amelia R. Hunt, Matthew D. Hilchey, and Raymond M. Klein, “Driving forces in free visual search: An ethology,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Joseph Schmidt, John M. Henderson, Steven G. Luke, and Tim J. Smith, “Dissociating temporal inhibition of return and saccadic momentum across multiple eye-movement tasks,” Journal Of Vision, vol. 14, no. 14, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • F. Balci, F. Coskun, Z. C. Sayali, and E. Guerbuez, “Optimal time discrimination (vol 68, pg 381, 2015),” Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. I–I, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mark Mills, Edwin S. Dalmaijer, Stefan Van der Stigchel, and Michael D. Dodd, “Effects of Task and Task-Switching on Temporal Inhibition of Return, Facilitation of Return, and Saccadic Momentum During Scene Viewing,” Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception And Performance, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1300–1314, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kate M. Thompson, and Tracy L. Taylor, “Memory instruction interacts with both visual and motoric inhibition of return,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Antje Nuthmann, “Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jasper H. Fabius, Martijn J. Schut, and Stefan Van der Stigchel, “Spatial inhibition of return as a function of fixation history, task, and spatial references,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ralph S. Redden, Jennifer Klages, and Raymond M. Klein, “The effect of scene removal on inhibition of return in a cue-target task,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • William Joseph MacInnes, “Multiple Diffusion Models to Compare Saccadic and Manual Responses for Inhibition of Return,” Neural Computation, pp. 1–21, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Rong Cao, Lü Wu, and Shuzhen Wang, “The Different Inhibition of Return (IOR) Effects of Emergency Managerial Experts and Novices: An Event-Related Potentials Study,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 11, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Fada Pan, Xiaogang Wu, and Li Zhang, “Is Inhibition of Return Modulated by Involuntary Orienting of Spatial Attention: An ERP Study,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar