Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
Volume 11, Pages 1660-1666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2011/486259
Research Article

Viable Extreme Preterm Birth and Some Neonatal Outcomes in Double Cerclage versus Traditional Cerclage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

1Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia 57146-15463, Iran
2Shahid Motahhari University Hospital, Kashani Street, Urmia 57146-15463, Iran
3Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia 57146-15463, Iran

Received 23 June 2011; Revised 7 August 2011; Accepted 8 August 2011

Academic Editor: Hatim Omar

Copyright © 2011 Farzaneh Broumand et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [7 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Zarko Alfirevic, Tamara Stampalija, Devender Roberts, and Andrea L JorgensenCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  • Jaleh Zolghadri, Masoumeh Younesi, Nasrin Asadi, Dezire Khosravi, Shabnam Behdin, Zohre Tavana, and Fariborz Ghaffarpasand, “Double versus single cervical cerclage for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: A randomized clinical trial,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2013. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  • Agustin Conde-Agudelo, Roberto Romero, Kypros Nicolaides, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, John M. O'Brien, Elcin Cetingoz, Eduardo da Fonseca, George Creasy, Priya Soma-Pillay, Shalini Fusey, Cetin Cam, Zarko Alfirevic, and Sonia S. Hassan, “Vaginal progesterone vs cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 42.e1–42.e18, 2013. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  • Vasileios Pergialiotis, Dimitrios G. Vlachos, Anastasia Prodromidou, Despina Perrea, Eleana Gkioka, and Georgios D. Vlachos, “Double vs single cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm births,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, pp. 1–22, 2014. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  • C.Y. Akladios, N. Sananes, A. Gaudineau, E. Boudier, and B. Langer, “Le cerclage cervical,” Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 2015. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  • Joshua D. Dahlke, Jeffrey D. Sperling, Suneet P. Chauhan, and Vincenzo Berghella, “Cervical Cerclage During Periviability,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 934–940, 2016. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar
  • Zarko Alfirevic, Tamara Stampalija, and Nancy MedleyCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017. View at PublisherView at Google Scholar