Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
Volume 11, Pages 1660-1666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2011/486259
Research Article

Viable Extreme Preterm Birth and Some Neonatal Outcomes in Double Cerclage versus Traditional Cerclage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

1Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia 57146-15463, Iran
2Shahid Motahhari University Hospital, Kashani Street, Urmia 57146-15463, Iran
3Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia 57146-15463, Iran

Received 23 June 2011; Revised 7 August 2011; Accepted 8 August 2011

Academic Editor: Hatim Omar

Copyright © 2011 Farzaneh Broumand et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. G. Gabbe, J. R. Niebyl, and J. L. Simpson, Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, Churchill Livingstone, 2007.
  2. A. H. Ansari and R. A. Reynolds, “Cervical incompetence: a review,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 161–171, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  3. V. N. Shirodkar, “A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy,” Antiseptic, vol. 52, pp. 299–300, 1955. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Owen, G. Hankins, J. D. Iams et al., “Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 4, pp. 375.e1–375.e8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. I. A. McDonald, “Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, vol. 64, pp. 346–350, 1957. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Svigos, J. M. Dodd, and J. S. Robinson, “Threatened and actual preterm labor including mode of delivery,” in High Risk Pregnancy: Management Options, pp. 1075–1090, Elsevier Saunders, 4th edition, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Noori, R. B. Helmig, M. Hein, and P. J. Steer, “Could a cervical occlusion suture be effective at improving perinatal outcome?” BJOG, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 532–536, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. H. Sadeghi Bazargani and S. Hajebrahimi, “Evidence-based urology: how does a randomized clinical trial achieve its designed goals?” Urology Journal, vol. 8, pp. 88–96, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. O. A. Rust, R. O. Atlas, J. Reed, J. Van Gaalen, and J. Balducci, “Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 1098–1105, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. S. M. Althuisius, G. A. Dekker, P. Hummel, D. J. Bekedam, and H. P. Van Geijn, “Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 1106–1112, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. M. S. To, Z. Alfirevic, V. C. F. Heath et al., “Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9424, pp. 1849–1853, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. V. Berghella, A. O. Odibo, and J. E. Tolosa, “Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1311–1317, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  13. K. Woensdregt, E. R. Norwitz, M. Cackovic, M. J. Paidas, and J. L. Illuzzi, “Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 396.e1–396.e7, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  14. M. Hein, E. V. Valore, R. B. Helmig, N. Uldbjerg, and T. Ganz, “Antimicrobial factors in the cervical mucus plug,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Hein, A. C. Petersen, R. B. Helmig, N. Uldbjerg, and J. Reinholdt, “Immunoglobulin levels and phagocytes in the cervical mucus plug at term of pregnancy,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 734–742, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. R. Rozansky, S. Persky, and B. Bercovice, “Antibacterial action of human cervical mucus,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 110, pp. 876–881, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Zuckerman, A. Kahana, and S. Carmel, “Antibacterial activity of human cervical mucus,” Gynecologic Investigation, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 265–271, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  18. N. J. Secher, C. D. McCormack, T. Weber, M. Hein, and R. B. Helmig, “Cervical occlusion in women with cervical insufficiency: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial with cerclage, with and without cervical occlusion,” BJOG, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 649.e1–649.e6, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. Y. L. Tsai, Y. H. Lin, K. M. Chong, L. W. Huang, J. L. Hwang, and K. M. Seow, “Effectiveness of double cervical cerclage in women with at least one previous pregnancy loss in the second trimester: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 666–671, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed