Research Article
Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Table 2
The result of analysis of variance along with postrhoc test (Tukey).
| | Mean differences | Standard error (SE) | Confidence interval (CI) | | Lower | Upper |
| ROI—Planimetry | 1.64 | 7.96 | −17.18 | 20.46 | 0.97 | ROI—Point counting | 4.78 | 7.96 | −14.04 | 23.61 | 0.82 | Planimetry—Point counting | −3.14 | 7.96 | −21.96 | 15.68 | 0.91 |
|
|