Research Article
Interim Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Findings Based on Different Datasets
Table 2
Degree of student involvement perceived by the program implementers.
| | | Negative response | Positive response | No response | All | | | Totally not involved | Not involved | Total | Involved | Totally involved | Total |
| S1 | | 0 | 6 | 6 | 102 | 11 | 113 | 1 | 120 | Percentage | 0% | 5.00% | 5.00% | 85.00% | 9.17% | 94.17% | 0.83% | 100% | S2 | | 0 | 7 | 7 | 129 | 8 | 137 | 1 | 145 | Percentage | 0% | 4.83% | 4.83% | 88.97% | 5.52% | 94.48% | 0.69% | 100% | S3 | | 0 | 10 | 10 | 94 | 7 | 101 | 2 | 113 | Percentage | 0% | 8.85% | 8.85% | 83.19% | 6.19% | 89.38% | 1.77% | 100% |
| Total | | 0 | 23 | 23 | 325 | 26 | 351 | 4 | 378 | | Percentage | 0% | 6.08% | 6.08% | 85.98% | 6.88% | 92.86% | 1.06% | 100% |
|
|