The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 137805 |

Lynne E. Murdoch, Michelle Maclean, Endarko Endarko, Scott J. MacGregor, John G. Anderson, "Bactericidal Effects of 405 nm Light Exposure Demonstrated by Inactivation of Escherichia, Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria, and Mycobacterium Species in Liquid Suspensions and on Exposed Surfaces", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 137805, 8 pages, 2012.

Bactericidal Effects of 405 nm Light Exposure Demonstrated by Inactivation of Escherichia, Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria, and Mycobacterium Species in Liquid Suspensions and on Exposed Surfaces

Academic Editor: Kent E. Kester
Received30 Oct 2011
Accepted08 Dec 2011
Published01 Apr 2012


The bactericidal effect of 405 nm light was investigated on taxonomically diverse bacterial pathogens from the genera Salmonella, Shigella, Escherichia, Listeria, and Mycobacterium. High-intensity 405 nm light, generated from an array of 405-nm light-emitting diodes (LEDs), was used to inactivate bacteria in liquid suspension and on exposed surfaces. L. monocytogenes was most readily inactivated in suspension, whereas S. enterica was most resistant. In surface exposure tests, L. monocytogenes was more susceptible than Gram-negative enteric bacteria to 405 nm light when exposed on an agar surface but interestingly less susceptible than S. enterica after drying onto PVC and acrylic surfaces. The study findings, that 405 nm light inactivates diverse types of bacteria in liquids and on surfaces, in addition to the safety advantages of this visible (non-UV wavelength) light, indicate the potential of this technology for a range of decontamination applications.

1. Introduction

Despite enormous investments in public health research, bacterial pathogens transmitted in food, water, and from other environmental sources remain a major cause of illness in both the developed and developing world. Examples of such ubiquitous pathogens include enteric Gram-negative bacteria such as Salmonella, Escherichia, and Shigella which continue to cause significant diarrhoeal infections worldwide [1]. The foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes also, has significant impact on health statistics through its propensity for causing serious illness in the immunocompromised [2]. Actinobacteria from the Mycobacterium genus are also a major cause of human morbidity and mortality and pathogens from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex such as M. bovis and M. tuberculosis remain amongst the most serious causes of infective disease worldwide [3].

Whilst many traditional decontamination methods give sterling service, they are not without limitations. Problems associated with product/material damage related to the use of physical methods and development of microbial resistance as well as the formation and persistence of potentially harmful residues are longstanding issues related to the use of chemical disinfectants such as sodium hypochlorite, ozone, and H2O2 [47]. Mycobacteria have innate resistance to chemical decontamination as they possess an unusual cell envelope containing peptidoglycan, arabinoglycan, and mycolic acid. This restricts the passage of many chemicals/drugs across the cell envelope, contributing to the hardiness of this microorganism [8, 9].

In response to the ongoing challenges presented by established and emerging pathogens and to provide additional or alternative approaches to microbial control, considerable interest has developed concerning novel methods of disinfection and decontamination.

Such alternative methods of decontamination include continuous and pulsed UV light, which has been shown to be highly germicidal. However, limitations such as poor transmissibility, degradative effects on materials, and potential carcinogenic effects in humans mean that there are restrictions in its use [1013]. A safe, non-UV, light-based decontamination technology termed high-intensity narrow-spectrum (HINS) light has been recently described. HINS light of 405 nm stimulates endogenous microbial porphyrin molecules to produce oxidising reactive oxygen species (ROS), predominantly singlet oxygen (1O2) that damages cells leading to microbial death [1416]. Specifically 405 nm light has been shown to be capable of inactivating a range of predominantly nosocomial pathogens and also Gram negative food-related pathogens [1722].

This study further investigates the inactivating effect of high-intensity 405 nm light exposure on taxonomically diverse bacterial pathogens. Inactivation data on three species of enteric facultatively anaerobic Gram negative bacilli (Salmonella enterica, Shigella sonnei, and Escherichia coli) were compared with the facultatively anaerobic Gram-positive coccobacillus Listeria monocytogenes and with the aerobic, acid fast Gram positive bacillus Mycobacterium terrae. The study also aimed to determine the effectiveness of 405 nm light for inactivating bacteria in both liquid suspensions and on exposed surfaces.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms

The bacteria used in this study were Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis NCTC 4444 (formerly known as Salmonella enteritidis), Shigella sonnei NCTC 12984, Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 NCTC 12900, Listeria monocytogenes NCTC 11994, and Mycobacterium terrae LMG 10394. All cultures were obtained from the National Collection of Type Cultures, Colindale, UK, except M. terrae, which was obtained from the Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, Universiteit Gent, Belgium. M. terrae was chosen as a safe, comparative, surrogate microorganism for the highly pathogenic M. tuberculosis. S. sonnei, S. enterica, and E. coli were inoculated into 100 mL Nutrient Broth, L. monocytogenes into 100 mL Tryptone Soya Broth (all Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), and M. terrae into 100 mL of Middlebrook 7H9 Broth containing ADC enrichment media (Becton Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA). Broths were cultivated at 37°C for 18 hours under rotary conditions (120 rpm), with the exception of M. terrae which was cultivated at 37°C for 14 days, after which the purity was checked using Ziehl-Neelsen stain (Kinyoun method). After cultivation, broths were centrifuged at 3939× g for 10 minutes, and the resultant pellet resuspended in 100 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and serially diluted to give the appropriate starting population of 1-2×105 CFU mL–1 for experimental use.

2.2. 405 nm Light Exposure of Bacterial Suspensions
2.2.1. Light Source

An indium-gallium-nitride 99-DIE light-emitting diode (LED) array (Opto Diode Corp, CA, USA) was used for exposure of bacterial suspensions. This array was 20 mm × 16 mm in size and had an emission at 405 nm with a bandwidth of 14 nm at full-width half maximum (FWHM). A cooling fan and heat sink were attached to the array to dissipate heat from the source and this also served to minimise any heat transfer to the sample. The LED array was mounted in a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) housing designed to fit a 12-well micro plate (NUNC, Roskilde, Denmark).

2.2.2. Treatment of Bacterial Suspensions

For exposure of bacterial suspensions, the LED array was set in a fixed position 2 cm directly above a micro plate well, which held a 2 mL volume of bacterial suspension. To ensure that all bacteria in the suspension were uniformly suspended and exposed to the same dose over the exposure period, a small magnetic follower was incorporated in the well and the sample dish and LED array were positioned on a magnetic stirrer which permitted continuous stirring of the sample during light exposure. The LED array was powered by a DC power supply (0.5 A ± 0.05 and 11.2 V ± 0.2), giving an approximate irradiance (or power density) of 10 mW cm–2 at the surface of the bacterial suspension.

In order to quantitatively examine the inactivation process, it was necessary to account for any attenuation of the irradiance of the 405 nm light as it passed through a bacterial sample; attenuation is a result of light absorption and scattering. Attenuation by the samples used in the study was examined by measuring the irradiance as the light entered the surface of the sample and comparing that value with the irradiance immediately below the sample depth of 7 mm, after allowing for the transmission loss through the base of the sample dish. These measurements showed that, for samples containing bacterial populations of 107 CFU mL–1 and less, no measurable attenuation, occurred, therefore; to ensure that no attenuation effects occurred, bacterial suspensions of 1-2×105 CFU mL–1 were used in the current study.

2.2.3. Dose Delivery Experiments

In order to establish if inactivation of bacteria was dose dependent, suspensions of L. monocytogenes of a population density of 1-2×105 CFU mL–1 were exposed to 108 J cm–2 of 405 nm light applied using three different regimes. Three different light irradiances were used (10 mW cm–2, 20 mW cm–2, and 30 mW cm–2), and in order to keep the total dose constant in each case (i.e., 108 J cm–2), the sample exposure time was adjusted according to the equation:𝐸=𝑃𝑡,(1) where 𝐸 is the energy density (dose) in J cm–2, 𝑃 is the irradiance (power density) in W cm–2, and 𝑡 is the time in seconds.

2.3. 405 nm Light Exposure of Bacteria Seeded onto Surfaces
2.3.1. Light Source

An ENFIS QUATTRO Mini Air Cooled Light Engine (ENFIS Ltd, Swansea, UK) was used for exposure of bacteria seeded onto agar and inert surfaces as this source allowed more effective treatment of larger surface areas. This source was an array of 144 LEDs (40 mm × 40 mm in size) with emission at 405 nm (16 nm FWHM) and was powered by a 48 V power supply. The light engine had an integrated heat sink and cooling fan to minimise any heat buildup during experimentation. The optical distribution of the 405 nm LED array emission was measured across the length and breadth of (i) a 9 cm diameter agar plate and (ii) 6 × 4 cm coupons of inert materials (polyvinyl chloride and acrylic), in 0.5 cm increments, using a radiant power density meter calibrated at 405 nm. These measurements were then used to generate a three-dimensional model using Maxima Software release (Figure 1). The average irradiance emitted by the light source was found to be 71 mW cm–2 across the agar plate and 110 mW cm–2 across the coupons, as calculated with Maxima Software release using the Romberg Method:𝑃=4.54.55(3+𝑚)×𝐸0×25+𝑥2+𝑦2(3+𝑚)/2𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝜋×𝑟2,(2) where 𝑃 is the average irradiance/power density, 𝐸0 is the irradiance/power density at the plate centre, 𝑚 is the Lambertian mode number and 𝑥 and 𝑦 are the cartesian coordinates.

2.3.2. Quantitative Agar Surface Exposure Experiments

Bacterial suspensions of S. enterica, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and S. sonnei, containing approximately 102 CFU mL–1, were pipetted and spread onto the surface of 9 cm Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates, giving approximately 200–250 CFU/per plate, equivalent to 2.3-2.4 log10 CFU/plate. Seeded agar plates were then exposed to increasing durations of high-intensity 405 nm light. Nonexposed control plates were prepared for each 405 nm light-exposed sample. This test was not carried out for M. terrae as the organism does not grow on TSA and an accurate comparison could not have been drawn with different growth media.

2.3.3. Qualitative Agar Surface Exposure Experiments

For a qualitative indication of the bactericidal effects of 405 nm light on surfaces, loopfuls of 106 CFU mL–1 bacterial suspensions of S. enterica, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and S. sonnei were streaked in individual lines of length 6 cm (1 cm apart) onto the surface of a TSA plate. Half of each inoculum line (3 cm) was exposed to high-intensity 405 nm light, with the other half covered with aluminium foil to prevent light exposure. Plates were exposed to 15, 30, and 45 minutes of high-intensity 405 nm light, with an average irradiance of 71 mW cm–2 across the plate. After exposure, plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 hours and photographs of each plate were taken. M. terrae was not included in this test due to its unique growth requirements.

2.3.4. Inert Surface Exposure Experiments

Bacterial suspensions of S. enterica (as a representative Gram negative bacterium) and L. monocytogenes (as a representative Gram positive bacterium) containing approximately 105 CFU mL–1 were loaded into a 6-jet Collison nebuliser (BGI Inc, MA, USA). Coupons of acrylic (6 cm × 4 cm) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (6 cm × 4 cm), pre-sterilised with 80% ethanol, were held at a distance of 3 cm from the nebuliser for 15 seconds allowing the aerosolised bacteria to deposit and immediately dry onto the surface of the coupon. Coupons after seeding were immediately exposed to increasing durations of high-intensity 405 nm light with an average irradiance of 110 mW cm–2 across the coupon surface. Following exposure, coupons were pressed onto a TSA surface for 5 seconds to recover the surviving bacteria from the seeded surface. This seeding and recovery process was also carried out for both the initial seeded population and the nonexposed control samples. These experiments were repeated in triplicate.

2.4. Plating and Enumeration

For the suspension exposure experiments, test and control samples were plated onto Nutrient Agar (E. coli, S. enterica, S. sonnei) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), TSA (L. monocytogenes) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), or Middlebrook 7H10 Agar with OADC enrichment media (M. terrae) (Becton Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA) plates. A WASP 2 spiral plater (Don Whitely Scientific Ltd, Shipley, UK) was used to plate out the samples, either as 50 μL spiral plate or 100 μL spread plate samples, with each sample being plated in at least triplicate. One millilitre pour plates were prepared if low counts were expected. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, except M. terrae plates which were incubated at 37°C for 7 days, after which the plates were enumerated and results reported as CFU mL–1.

For the agar and inert surface exposure experiments, plates were incubated directly following exposure at 37°C for 24 hours with results reported as CFU per plate. Qualitative experiment plates were photographed using a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T2 digital camera.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data points on each figure represent the mean results of two or more independent experiments, with each individual experimental data point being sampled in triplicate at least. Data points include the standard deviation and significant differences obtained from results. Significant differences were calculated at the 95% confidence interval using ANOVA (one way) with MINITAB software release 15.

3. Results

Liquid bacterial suspensions were exposed to 405 nm light at an irradiance of 10 mW cm–2 for increasing time periods. From these values, the absolute dose applied in each experiment can be calculated using (2). Figure 2 demonstrates the effect of 405 nm light exposure on suspensions of Gram negative bacteria—E. coli,—S. enterica, S. sonnei—and Gram positive bacteria—L. monocytogenes and M. terrae. S. enteritidis and E. coli were inactivated by 3.5-log10 CFU mL–1 and 5-log10 CFU mL–1, respectively, at 288 J cm–2, and S. sonnei was inactivated by 5-log10 CFU mL–1 at a lower dose of 180 J cm–2. M. terrae was inactivated by 4-5 log10 CFU mL–1 between a dose of 144 and 288 J cm–2, and L. monocytogenes was inactivated by 5-log10 CFU mL–1 at 108 J cm–2. It should be noted that the population densities of control samples for all five bacterial species remained constant throughout this series of experiments (data not shown).

Table 1 contains the results of exposing suspensions of L. monocytogenes to 108 J cm–2 of 405 nm light, with the 108 J cm–2 dose being applied in varying regimes. The results demonstrate that application of the dose, regardless of how it is applied (i.e., lower irradiance for longer exposure time or higher irradiance for shorter exposure time), yields very similar final populations (no statistical significant difference), in this case approximately a 5-log10 CFU mL–1 reduction in bacterial numbers.

Power density (mW cm–2)Exposure time (min)Dose (J cm–2)Log10 CFU mL–1 reduction

101801085.18* (SD ±0.2)
20901085.05* (SD ±0.0)
30601084.90* (SD ±0.4)

*Indicates where a light-exposed bacterial count was significantly different from the non-exposed control count ( 𝑃 0 . 0 5 calculated at the 95% confidence interval).
SD: standard deviation of averaged results.

In order to eliminate the possibility of inactivation being the result of heat transfer from the LED array during sample exposure, the temperatures of the bacterial suspensions were monitored during experimentation. Temperature readings (taken every 15 minutes) showed that the bacterial suspensions experienced minimal temperature changes during light exposure. Temperature was monitored over a 480-minute period (longest exposure time). The initial temperature of the suspensions was 26°C, which fluctuated ±1°C throughout the exposure period.

The inactivation achieved when bacterial-seeded agar plates were exposed to high-intensity 405 nm light (with an average irradiance of approximately 71 mW cm–2 across the plate) is shown in Table 2. With all four bacterial species tested, almost complete (100%) inactivation was achieved (<1 CFU/plate). L. monocytogenes was again inactivated at the fastest rate, with 100% reduction at an average dose of 128 J cm–2. S. enterica, S. sonnei, and E. coli were inactivated by 2.28 (100%), 2.10 (99.3%), and 2.18 (99.8%) log10 CFU/plate, respectively, at an average dose of 192 J cm–2.

DoseS. enterica (Log10 CFU/plate ± SD)S. sonnei (Log10 CFU/plate ± SD)E. coli 0157:H7 (Log10 CFU/plate ± SD)L. monocytogenes (Log10 CFU/plate ± SD)
Exposure time (min)(J cm2)Non-light exposedLight exposedLog10 reduction
(% reduction)
Non-light exposedLight exposedLog10 reduction
(% reduction)
Non-light exposedLight exposedLog10 reduction
(% reduction)
Non-light exposedLight exposedLog10 reduction
(% reduction)

10602.44 (±0.02)2.37 (±0.03)0.07* (15.3%)
15902.38 (±0.03)2.33 (±0.02)0.05 (11.3%)2.28 (±0.02)1.82 (±0.12)0.46* (64.4%)2.32 (±0.02)2.09 (±0.13)0.23* (39.4%)
201202.33 (±0.10)1.65 (±0.30)0.68* (76.4%)
301802.33 (±0.01)1.19 (±0.30)1.14* (91.4%)2.21 (±0.09)0.93 (±0.40)1.28* (93.3%)2.27 (±0.03)0.90 (±0.10)1.37* (95.7%)2.25 (±0.06)0 (±0.00)2.25* (100%)
452702.28 (±0.02)0 (±0.00)2.28* (100%)2.26 (±0.04)0.16 (±0.30)2.10* (99.3%)2.18 (±0.02)0 (±0.00)2.18* (99.8%)

*Indicates where a light-exposed sample value was statistically significant from a non-exposed control value ( 𝑃 0 . 0 5 calculated at the 95% confidence interval).
SD: standard deviation of averaged results.

Figure 3 shows a qualitative representation of the bactericidal effect of high-intensity 405 nm light on the four bacteria, E. coli, S. sonnei, S. enterica, and L. monocytogenes. The streaks of bacteria were light-exposed for 15, 30, and 45 minutes (Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c), resp.). It can be seen that L. monocytogenes was the most susceptible and that by 45 minutes of 405 nm light exposure all of the tested species of bacteria were effectively inactivated.

The results of the 405 nm light inactivation of S. enterica and L. monocytogenes seeded onto acrylic and PVC surfaces are reported in Table 3. Both S. enterica and L. monocytogenes were inactivated more readily on the PVC surface using high-intensity 405 nm light than on acrylic surfaces. Interestingly, the Gram negative S. enterica was more rapidly inactivated than the Gram positive L. monocytogenes on both surfaces. S. enterica was inactivated by 2.19 log10 CFU/plate (100%) on PVC with an average dose of 50 J cm–2 and 1.63 log10 CFU/plate (98%) on acrylic with an average dose of 66 J cm–2. L. monocytogenes was inactivated by 0.90 log10 CFU/plate (90%) on PVC with an average dose of 50 J cm–2, and only 0.42 log10 CFU/plate (61%) on acrylic with an average dose of 66 J cm–2. When non-exposed control counts were compared to the counts of the initial seeded population it was found that between 70 and 80% of the seeded bacteria were nonrecoverable from acrylic and PVC surfaces after 7.5–10 minutes, likely as a result of inactivation by desiccation. Therefore, inactivation results were calculated as the reduction of light-exposed bacteria when compared to the respective non-exposed control and are reported as both reduction in log10 CFU/plate and % inactivation.

S. enterica (Log10 CFU/plate ± SD)L. monocytogenes (Log10 CFU/plate ± SD)
Exposure time (min)Dose J (cm) 2 Non-exposedLight exposedLog10 reduction
(% reduction)
Non-exposedLight exposedLog10 reduction
(% reduction)

PVC2.5152.54 (±0.10)0.53 (±0.21)2.01* (98%)2.08 (±0.45)1.41 (±0.18)0.68* (78%)
5302.62 (±0.15)0.72 (±0.40)1.90* (99%)1.93 (±0.28)1.0 (±0.42)0.93* (86%)
7.5452.19 (±0.03)0 (±0.0)2.19* (100%)1.69 (±0.40)0.79 (±0.1)0.90* (90%)

Acrylic2.5152.76 (±0.13)1.59 (±0.05)1.18* (93%)2.45 (±0.06)2.21 (±0.22)0.24 (36%)
5302.42 (±0.16)1.18 (±0.31)1.24* (93%)2.37 (±0.06)2.15 (±0.12)0.22 (39%)
7.5452.66 (±0.1)1.20 (±0.26)1.46* (96%)2.24 (±0.10)2.02 (±0.17)0.21 (36%)
10602.09 (±0.16)0.46 (±0.15)1.63* (98%)2.18 (±0.16)1.75 (±0.21)0.42* (61%)

*Indicates where a light-exposed sample value was statistically significant from a non-exposed control value ( 𝑃 0 . 0 5 calculated at the 95% confidence interval).
SD: standard deviation of averaged results.

4. Discussion

This study has demonstrated that 405 nm light has a significant bactericidal effect on a number of important and taxonomically diverse bacterial pathogens. The current study set out with two aims: (1) to test the relative susceptibility of several diverse types of bacterial pathogens, including mycobacteria, which are among the most difficult of bacteria to inactivate using conventional decontamination techniques and (2) to determine the effectiveness of 405 nm light for inactivation of selected types of pathogens in both liquid suspensions and on surfaces.

The most resistant bacterium in liquid suspension was S. enterica, which was inactivated by 3.5-log10 CFU mL–1 at a dose of 288 J cm–2, around 2.5 times the dose required for 5-log10 CFU mL–1 inactivation of the least susceptible bacterium L. monocytogenes (108 J cm–2). M. terrae was inactivated by 4-5 log10 CFU mL–1 between 144 and 288 J cm–2, and E. coli and S. sonnei were inactivated by 5-log10 CFU mL–1 at 288 J cm–2 and 180 J cm–2, respectively.

L. monocytogenes also proved to be the most readily inactivated organism when seeded onto agar surfaces, with 100% inactivation achieved with an average dose of 128 J cm–2. The least susceptible microorganism, of those tested, in the agar surface exposure experiments appeared to be S. sonnei with a 2.10 log10 CFU/plate (99.3%) reduction in bacterial numbers achieved at an average dose of 192 J cm–2, however; in statistical tests this level of inactivation was not significantly different from the percentage inactivation rates achieved for S. enterica and E. coli at the same dose. It would be interesting to directly compare the susceptibility of the test bacteria exposed in liquid suspension to those seeded onto surfaces; however, the inactivation doses cannot be directly compared due to differences in the experimental arrangements and exposure conditions. Under suspension test conditions, uniform exposure of a well-mixed bacterial suspension was achieved, whereas with surface exposure tests, light irradiance varied over the surface, therefore requiring that an average power density/irradiance value be calculated in order to determine the corresponding dose values.

Reasons for the variable susceptibility of different bacteria to 405 nm light are as yet undetermined. Studies have reported that Gram positive species, in general, were more susceptible to 405 nm light inactivation than Gram negative species, which is generally consistent with the results obtained in the current study [21]. It is also theorised that the difference in inactivation kinetics may be due to organism-specific differences in porphyrin levels, porphyrin types, porphyrin wavelength absorption maxima, or as a consequence of the relatively short distance that singlet oxygen molecules can diffuse (~20 nm3 in solution) within cell structures [13, 21, 23]. In addition it has been speculated that less oxygen-tolerant bacterial species may be particularly susceptible to the effects of ROS as microorganisms such as some microaerophilic species have been found to possess fewer key oxidative regulators than most aerobes [24, 25]. Studies have shown blue light to be capable of inactivating the anaerobic oral pathogens Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium as well as microaerophilic pathogens such as Propionibacterium acnes and Helicobacter pylori [15, 2629]. However, inactivation results achieved with anaerobic/microaerophilic bacteria have not provided conclusive evidence as to whether oxygen-sensitive bacteria are any more susceptible than aerobes as many of these bacteria are also known to accumulate high levels of porphyrins.

The inactivation data for bacteria exposed in suspension in the present study can be compared with the 405 nm inactivation data obtained in other studies [21, 22]. L. monocytogenes, although much more readily inactivated than the microorganisms S. sonnei, M. terrae, S. enterica, and E. coli, was less susceptible than the majority of the medically significant Gram positive organisms (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Clostridium species) investigated by Maclean et al. [21]. All Gram negative organisms (Acinetobacter, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, and Escherichia species) tested by Maclean et al. [21] had inactivation rates comparable with the values found in the present study for S. sonnei, E. coli, and S. enterica. A notable exception to this is the Gram negative microaerophilic organism Campylobacter jejuni, investigated in a study by Murdoch et al. [22], which exhibited a particularly high sensitivity to 405 nm light. Interestingly, M. terrae showed similar inactivation kinetics to the Gram negative pathogens, particularly S. sonnei. Possible explanations for this difference in inactivation susceptibility could be that the unusual cell envelope, characteristic of mycobacteria, confers some resistance to 405 nm light penetration and/or that mycobacterial cell envelopes provide greater innate resistance to ROS given that mycobacteria species are capable of evading phagocytic oxidative burst damage [30].

A study by Bohrerova and Linden [31] into UV light inactivation showed M. terrae to be more resistant to the effects of the UV light than other representative Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial pathogens. The study demonstrated UV-light susceptibility in M. terrae and M. tuberculosis to be almost identical which corresponds well with studies by Maclean et al. [21], where they achieved similar inactivation kinetics between bacteria of the same genus when exposed to 405 nm light. The results of these studies also indicate the suitability of M. terrae as a reliable M. tuberculosis surrogate organism in light inactivation studies.

This study has demonstrated that exposure to high-intensity 405 nm light is capable of inactivating a variety of taxonomically diverse bacterial pathogens without the requirement for exogenous photosensitiser molecules. The bactericidal effect was demonstrated quantitatively in liquid suspension and both quantitatively and qualitatively on agar plates and inert surfaces. The inactivation process has been shown to be dose dependent; therefore, higher-intensity light-sources could achieve lethal doses in shorter time periods. The findings that the bacteria can be inactivated using high-intensity 405 nm light whilst seeded on both nutritious and inert surfaces is particularly significant for potential practical application within the food and healthcare industry, where cross-contamination from environmental contact surfaces and equipment is a problem. The fact that 405 nm light falls within the visible light range and does not require the containment conditions of harmful UV light potentially permits the continuous treatment of food contact areas in the presence of operator personnel, a uniquely advantageous feature. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of 405 nm LED arrays for practical applications, such as the continuous treatment of large surface areas, custom-designed light sources are required that can achieve a more uniform power density distribution, perhaps through the use of lenses. Future work to assess the treatment potential of 405 nm light, as well as further studies on the inactivation of bacterial biofilms, will also be important in order to fully assess the potential of this inactivation technology for applications within the food industry alongside other safety control methods.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


The first author would like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for support through a Doctoral Training Grant (Awarded 2007–2010). All authors would like to thank The Robertson Trust for their funding support.


  1. World Health Organisation (WHO), “Initiative for vaccine research: diarrhoeal diseases,” 2009, View at: Google Scholar
  2. N. E. Freitag, G. C. Port, and M. D. Miner, “Listeria monocytogenes—from saprophyte to intracellular pathogen,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 623–628, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. O'Riordan, D. S. Sharlin, J. Gross et al., “Photoinactivation of mycobacteria in vitro and in a new murine model of localized Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced granulomatous infection,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1828–1834, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. G. Kim, A. E. Yousef, and S. Dave, “Application of ozone for enhancing the microbiological safety and quality of foods: a review,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1071–1087, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. D. Russell, “Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: present knowledge and future problems,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 43, supplement 1, pp. S57–S68, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Springthorpe, “Disinfection of surfaces and equipment,” Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 558–560, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. Barbut, D. Menuet, M. Verachten, and E. Girou, “Comparison of the efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system and sodium hypochlorite solution for eradication of Clostridium difficile spores,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 507–514, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. Jarlier and H. Nikaido, “Mycobacterial cell wall: structure and role in natural resistance to antibiotics,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 11–18, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  9. L. J. Alderwick, H. L. Birch, A. K. Mishra, L. Eggeling, and G. S. Besra, “Structure, function and biosynthesis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall: arabinogalactan and lipoarabinomannan assembly with a view to discovering new drug targets,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1325–1328, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. J. Rowan, S. J. MacGregor, J. G. Anderson, R. A. Fouracre, L. McIlvaney, and O. Farish, “Pulsed-light inactivation of food-related microorganisms,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1312–1315, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. L. Andrady, S. H. Hamid, X. Hu, and A. Torikai, “Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on materials,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 46, no. 1–3, pp. 96–103, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. L. Bialka and A. Demirci, “Decontamination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica on blueberries using ozone and pulsed UV-light,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. M391–M396, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. R. Hamblin and T. Hasan, “Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease?” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 436–450, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Elman and J. Lebzelter, “Light therapy in the treatment of Acne vulgaris,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. O. Feuerstein, I. Ginsburg, E. Dayan, D. Veler, and E. I. Weiss, “Mechanism of visible light phototoxicity on Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1186–1189, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Maclean, S. J. MacGregor, J. G. Anderson, and G. A. Woolsey, “The role of oxygen in the visible-light inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 180–184, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Maclean, An investigation into the light inactivation of medically important microorganisms, Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, 2006.
  18. J. S. Guffey and J. Wilborn, “In vitro bactericidal effects of 405 nm and 470 nm blue light,” Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 684–688, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. S. Enwemeka, D. Williams, S. Hollosi, D. Yens, and S. K. Enwemeka, “Visible 405 nm SLD light photo-destroys methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) In vitro,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 734–737, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Maclean, S. J. MacGregor, J. G. Anderson, and G. Woolsey, “High-intensity narrow-spectrum light inactivation and wavelength sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 285, no. 2, pp. 227–232, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Maclean, S. J. MacGregor, J. G. Anderson, and G. A. Woolsey, “Inactivation of bacterial pathogens following exposure to light from a 405 nm LED array,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 1932–1937, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. E. Murdoch, M. MacLean, S. J. MacGregor, and J. G. Anderson, “Inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni by exposure to high-intensity visible light,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1211–1216, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Z. Malik, H. Ladan, and Y. Nitzan, “Photodynamic inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria: problems and possible solutions,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 262–266, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Jean, V. Briolat, and G. Reysset, “Oxidative stress response in Clostridium perfringens,” Microbiology, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 1649–1659, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Murphy, C. Carroll, and K. N. Jordan, “Environmental survival mechanisms of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 623–632, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. A. Henry, B. Dyer, M. Wagner, M. Judy, and J. L. Matthews, “Phototoxicity of argon laser irradiation on biofilms of Porphyromonas and Prevotella species,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 34, no. 2-3, pp. 123–128, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Ashkenazi, Z. Malik, Y. Harth, and Y. Nitzan, “Eradication of Propionibacterium acnes by its endogenic porphyrins after illumination with high intensity blue light,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. R. Hamblin and T. Hasan, “Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease?” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 436–450, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. S. Soukos, S. Som, A. D. Abernethy et al., “Phototargeting oral black-pigmented bacteria,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1391–1396, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Chan, T. Fujiwara, P. Brennan et al., “Microbial glycolipids: possible virulence factors that scavenge oxygen radicals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 2453–2457, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  31. Z. Bohrerova and K. G. Linden, “Assessment of DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae after exposure to UV irradiation,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 995–1001, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Lynne E. Murdoch et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.