Research Article
Family and Personal Adjustment of Economically Disadvantaged Chinese Adolescents in Hong Kong
Table 4
Differences between poor group and nonpoor group in positive youth development constructs.
| Measures | Poor group | Nonpoor group | F value | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| CBC | 4.37 | 0.83 | 4.45 | 0.74 | 2.50 | PA | 4.45 | 0.93 | 4.53 | 0.87 | 1.70 | GPYDQ | 4.51 | 0.75 | 4.59 | 0.71 | 2.36 | PIT | 4.04 | 1.08 | 4.27 | 0.94 | 11.82* |
| Problem behavior | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.03 | Substance abuse | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.44 |
| Family interaction | 3.48 | 0.83 | 3.78 | 0.81 | 25.28* | Paternal parenting | 2.29 | 0.72 | 2.63 | 0.52 | 64.35* | Maternal parenting | 2.86 | 0.58 | 2.93 | 0.50 | 4.32 |
|
|
Note. An overall alpha level based on the Bonferroni adjustment was carried out to adjust for inflated type 1 error.
*
.
|