Research Article
Measurement of Prosocial Reasoning among Chinese Adolescents
Table 4
Comparison of prosocial reasoning between males and females, with age as covariate.
| | Malea | Femalea | | Variables | () | () | F | | M | SE | M | SE | |
| Hedonistic | .176 | .002 | .168 | .001 | 13.06*** | Needs oriented | .206 | .002 | .212 | .001 | 7.54** | Approval oriented | .183 | .002 | .184 | .001 | .49 | Stereotypic | .219 | .002 | .220 | .001 | .00 | Internalized | .216 | .001 | .216 | .001 | .08 | PROM overall weighted | 1.86 | .004 | 1.86 | .003 | 2.33 |
|
|
*
, **, ***.
aEstimated marginal means and standard errors were presented, adjusted for age effects.
|