Research Article

Participants’ Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Are Findings Based on Different Datasets Consistent?

Table 1

Description of data characteristics from 2005 to 2009.

S1S2S3
2005/06 EIP2006/07 FIP2007/08 FIP2008/09 FIP2006/07 EIP2007/08 FIP2008/09 FIP2007/08 EIP2008/09 FIP

Total schools that joined P.A.T.H.S.522072131974919619848167
(i) 10 h program23951081042711311029104
(ii) 20 h program29112105932283881963

Tier 1 Program:
Mean no. of sessions of program implementation17.75 (3–50)23.55 (2–50)23.61 (5–60)23.54 (5–65)23.76 (10–40)22.81 (7–60)23.04 (4–48)24.07 (10–44)22.78 (7–66)
No. of schools incorporated into formal curriculum211011169826108993085
No. of schools incorporated into other modes3110697992388991882
Mean no. of classes per school4.58 (2–7)4.66 (1–8)4.69 (1–8)4.56 (1–8)4.51 (1–7)4.62 (1–8)4.64 (1–8)4.56 (1–8)4.67 (1–8)
Total no. of students867935,73536,34331,280816733,44933,583770828,157
Mean no. of students per school166.90 (37–240)172.63 (17–280)171.05 (16–267)158.78 (5–251)166.67 (32–240)170.66 (12–280)169.61 (15–263)160.58 (26–240)168.60 (28–240)
Total no. of student respondents8,05733,69333,86729,1007,40630,73131,1976,83025,432
Mean no. of student respondents per school154.94 (37–212)162.77 (15–265)159.00 (14–267)147.72 (3–251)151.14 (32–220)156.80 (12–243)157.56 (15–263)142.29 (23–213)152.29 (22–229)

Note: S1: secondary 1 level; S2: secondary 2 level; S3: secondary 3 level; EIP: Experimental Implementation Phase, FIP: Full Implementation Phase.