Research Article

Traditional Medicinal Herbs and Food Plants Have the Potential to Inhibit Key Carbohydrate Hydrolyzing Enzymes In Vitro and Reduce Postprandial Blood Glucose Peaks In Vivo

Table 2

Effects of AM and MC on α-glucosidase activity.

Concentration of extracts (μg/mL)α-Glucosidase activity % inhibition (−) or stimulation (+)a
Crude water ExtractCrude methanol extractDichloro-methane fractionEthyl acetate fractionn-Butanol fractionWater fraction

100 ( 8 7 . 3 6 ± 5 . 3 2 )
[ 6 8 . 9 6 ± 5 . 6 8 ]
( 9 5 . 6 3 ± 6 . 2 3 )
[ 7 6 . 6 5 ± 2 . 3 6 ]
( 9 4 . 6 3 ± 6 . 6 5 )
[ 8 9 . 5 9 ± 2 . 5 4 ]
( 9 8 . 6 4 ± 7 . 4 2 )
[ 9 0 . 5 6 ± 8 . 5 4 ]
( 7 2 . 6 3 ± 6 . 1 2 )
[ 8 7 . 6 5 ± 6 . 0 4 ]
( 5 6 . 3 2 ± 2 . 3 6 )
[ 6 2 . 3 6 ± 6 . 5 4 ]
50 ( 7 6 . 3 2 ± 6 . 3 2 )
[ 5 4 . 3 6 ± 4 . 3 6 ]
( 8 1 . 2 6 ± 7 . 1 2 )
[ 5 9 . 6 8 ± 5 . 6 7 ]
( 7 4 . 1 2 ± 5 . 6 2 )
[ 7 6 . 6 3 ± 3 . 2 1 ]
( 8 2 . 3 6 ± 2 . 3 4 )
[ 7 9 . 6 3 ± 7 . 5 4 ]
( 5 2 . 3 2 ± 2 . 3 5 )
[ 6 2 . 3 8 ± 4 . 2 1 ]
( 3 6 . 3 2 ± 3 . 3 6 )
[ 5 2 . 3 1 ± 2 . 3 5 ]
25 ( 5 2 . 3 6 ± 4 . 2 3 )
[ 3 6 . 1 2 ± 2 . 5 4 ]
( 6 6 . 3 2 ± 2 . 3 6 )
[ 4 2 . 1 6 ± 2 . 1 5 ]
( 6 9 . 3 2 ± 4 . 1 2 )
[ 6 0 . 1 5 ± 1 . 6 8 ]
( 7 6 . 3 2 ± 6 . 3 2 )
[ 6 2 . 6 4 ± 6 . 2 1 ]
( 4 0 . 1 6 ± 1 . 3 6 )
[ 4 0 . 1 3 ± 5 . 3 2 ]
( 2 8 . 6 9 ± 1 . 1 2 )
[ 3 5 . 3 6 ± 3 . 5 7 ]
12.5 ( 3 2 . 1 5 ± 2 . 3 2 )
[ 2 8 . 6 9 ± 1 . 6 9 ]
( 5 0 . 1 9 ± 1 . 1 3 )
[ 3 5 . 6 7 ± 1 . 6 9 ]
( 5 2 . 1 4 ± 2 . 3 6 )
[ 4 0 . 1 9 ± 3 . 2 8 ]
( 5 9 . 3 2 ± 5 . 3 2 )
[ 4 0 . 1 6 ± 3 . 5 4 ]
( 3 6 . 9 4 ± 2 . 3 6 )
[ 2 7 . 6 8 ± 2 . 3 1 ]
( 1 4 . 3 2 ± 1 . 6 2 )
[ 2 6 . 6 3 ± 2 . 0 7 ]

aResults are expressed as mean percentage ± S.E.M of seven observations in each group; (% inhibition of AM); (% inhibition of MC).
The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (%) was defined as the percentage decrease in absorbance over the control (without extract).
*Values significantly different ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ) from the control (without extract) in each group.