Research Article

Secondary Data Analyses of Subjective Outcome Evaluation Data Based on Nine Databases

Table 3

Responses on Views toward Program Implementers in Different Cohorts.

GradeYear đť‘› Positive responses (%)Top three responses among the positive responses

S12005/066598%Satisfied (42)
Devoted (4)
Very positive (3)
2006/0733498%Satisfied (110)
Satisfactory performance (92)
Commitment (21)
2007/0843097%Instructors were satisfied with their own performance (102)
Satisfied (93)
Instructor’s attitude and performance influenced students’ learning (45)
2008/0936899%Satisfied with/appreciated instructors’ performance (119)
Instructors were satisfied with their own performance (82)
Sufficient preparation/understanding of the program (23)
S22006/078499%Good performance (35)
Instructor satisfied with their own performance (27)
Care about students (6)
2007/0835497%Satisfied (84)
Instructors were satisfied with their own performance (80)
Instructor’s attitude and performance influenced students’ learning (31)
2008/0942894%Satisfied with/appreciated instructors’ performance (112)
Instructors were satisfied with their own performance (96)
Sufficient preparation/understanding of the program (30)
S32007/087895%Instructors were satisfied with their own performance (25)
Students were satisfied with instructors’ performance (22)
Instructor’s attitude and performance influenced students’ learning (7)
2008/0928699%Satisfied with/appreciated instructors’ performance (84)
Instructors were satisfied with their own performance (56)
Instructor’s attitude and performance influenced students’ learning (23)

Total number of meaningful units2,427Average positive responses: 97.33%