Research Article

Secondary Data Analyses of Subjective Outcome Evaluation Data Based on Nine Databases

Table 4

Perceived effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program in different cohorts.

GradeYear đť‘› Positive responses (%)Top three responses

S12005/0612494%Could help students’ development (33)
Promoted social ability (14)
Promoted self-understanding (8)
Enhanced self-confidence (8)
2006/0762697%Improved interpersonal relationship (69)
Enhanced students’ development (190)
Enhanced self-understanding (45)
2007/08103294%Promoted students’ development (227)
Promoted ability of differentiating between right and wrong (59)
Could help instructors (48)
2008/0977499%Enhanced students’ development (194)
Promoted communication and interpersonal skills (77)
Beneficial to students (59)
S22006/07140100%Promoted students’ development (41)
Improved interpersonal relationship (16)
Enhanced instructors and students relationship (10)
2007/0878294%Enhanced students’ development (191)
Promoted communication and interpersonal skill (68)
Promoted ability of differentiating between right and wrong (37)
2008/0981096%Enhanced students’ development (179)
Beneficial to students (72)
Promoted communication and interpersonal skills (59)
S32007/0820993%Enhanced social skills (13)
Enhanced students’ development (49)
Promoted ability of differentiating between right and wrong (12)
2008/0967995%Enhanced students’ development (156)
Promoted communication and interpersonal skills (53)
Beneficial to students (41)

Total number of meaningful units5,176Average positive responses: 95.78%