Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. Based on Students’ Weekly Diaries: Findings from Eight Datasets

Table 3

Views on the instructor across study 1 to study 8.

Views on the instructor	Responses	S1			S2			S3		Total
		Study 1; 2005/2006 EIP	Study 2; 2006/2007 FIP	Study 3; 2008/2009 FIP	Study 4; 2006/2007 EIP	Study 5; 2007/2008 FIP	Study 6; 2008/2009 FIP	Study 7; 2007/2008 EIP	Study 8; 2008/2009 FIP
Overall impression	Positive: (e.g., nice, liked instructors, could motivate students, and thankful to instructors)	2	8	0	41	2	6	22	16	97
	Negative: (e.g., disgusting, strict, always blaming, and inconsistent facilitation skills between instructors)	3	1	0	3	0	0	0	0	7
	Subtotal	5	9	0	44	2	6	22	16	104
Teaching performance	Positive: (e.g., excellent, well prepared, professional, and shared own experiences)	9	28	17	51	28	17	27	45	222
	Negative: (e.g., boring teaching, poor classroom management, poor teaching skills, and taught in a hurry manner)	0	3	0	4	3	0	23	1	34
	Subtotal	9	31	17	55	31	17	50	46	256
Teaching attitude	Positive: (e.g., enthusiastic, devoted, willing/able to help students, and patient)	5	7	4	40	10	12	27	57	162
	Subtotal	5	7	4	40	10	12	27	57	162
Others	Positive	3	3	0	15	0	0	4	0	25
	Negative	0	0	0	3	0	0	2	0	5
	Neutral	0	0	2	2	0	2	0	0	6
	Subtotal	3	3	2	20	0	2	6	0	36
Grand total	Positive (%)	19 (86)	46 (92)	21 (91.3)	147 (92.4)	40 (93)	35 (94.6)	80 (76.2)	118 (99.2)	506
	Negative (%)	3 (14)	4 (8)	0	10 (6.3)	3 (7)	0	25 (23.8)	1 (0.8)	46
	Neutral (%)	0	0	2 (8.7)	2 (1.3)	0	2 (5.4)	0	0	6
	Total (%)	22 (100)	50 (100)	23 (100)	159 (100)	43 (100)	37 (100)	105 (100)	119 (100)	558
Total in each grade	Positive (%)	86 (90.5)			222 (92.9)			198 (88.4)		506
	Negative (%)	7 (7.4)			13 (5.4)			26 (11.6)		46
	Neutral (%)	2 (2.1)			4 (1.7)			0		6
	Total (%)	95 (100)			239 (100)			224 (100)		558