Clinical Study

The Presence of Visual Neglect after Thrombolytic Treatment in Patients with Right Hemisphere Stroke

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with (T+) and without thrombolysis (T−) and the comparison between the groups.

T+ ( 𝑛 = 3 4 )T– ( 𝑛 = 4 3 ) 𝑃 value

Male/Female19/1531/120.090
Age: Md (range)60.5 (30–77)62.0 (36–79)0.252
Education in years: Md (range)10.0 (6–16)9.0 (6–20)0.278
MMSE: Md (range)27.5 (20–30)27 (21–30)a0.731
Neuropsychological examination (days): Md (range)5.0 (1–10)3.0 (1–11)0.798
Neurological examination (days): Md (range)5.0 (1–10)b3.0 (1–10)a0.305
(a) Baseline measures
 NIHSS: Md (range)6.0 (1–17)4.0 (1–15)0.137
 Hemianopia: present (%)5 (16)a6 (14)0.841
 Hemiparesis: present (%)26 (76)30 (70)0.515
(b) Measures at ward
 BITC: Md (range)143.5 (38–146)142 (31–146)0.150
 BITC: VN present (%)5 (15)12 (28)0.168
 NIHSS: Md (range)1 (0–17)a3 (0–14)b0.009
 Hemianopia: present (%)5 (15)b5 (12)c0.745
 Hemiparesis: present (%)11 (33)b17 (40)c0.426

Abbreviations: Md: median; BITC: sum score of six conventional subtests of the Behavioural Inattention Test (range 0–146; ≤129 = visual neglect, ≥130 = no visual neglect); MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination (range 0–30); Neuropsychological examination: days from onset to neuropsychological examination; neurological examination: days from onset to neurological examination; VN: visual neglect; NIHSS: sum score of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (range: 0–34; 0 = no defect; 34 = severe stroke); at baseline: outcome on admission in the emergency department; at ward: outcome at neurological ward; amissing value for one patient; bthree patients had missing values; cfour patients had missing values.