Predictors of Prosocial Behavior among Chinese High School Students in Hong Kong

Table 1

Sex differences in prosocial behavior and its correlates.

Variable^a	Sex	M	SE	95% CI		𝐹	𝜂^2
				Lower	Upper
Antisocial behavior	M	3.46	.22	3.03	3.88	20.64***	.04
	F	2.25	.15	1.95	2.55
Prosocial behavior	M	3.31	.14	3.02	3.59	.49	.00
	F	3.43	.10	3.23	3.63
ABQ score	M	−.15	.22	−.59	.29	23.77***	.03
	F	1.18	.16	.87	1.49
Prosocial norms	M	4.65	.05	4.54	4.75	12.79***	.03
	F	4.88	.04	4.81	4.95
Pragmatic values	M	2.72	.04	2.63	2.81	6.67*	.01
	F	2.86	.03	2.80	2.92
PROM overall weighted	M	6.46	.08	6.31	6.61	20.47***	.04
	F	6.88	.05	6.77	6.99
Personal distress subscale	M	1.98	.05	1.88	2.07	20.03***	.06
	F	2.28	.03	2.22	2.35
Fantasy subscale	M	2.07	.06	1.95	2.19	11.01**	.02
	F	2.32	.04	2.24	2.41
Empathy subscale	M	2.45	.04	2.36	2.52	10.92**	.02
	F	2.60	.03	2.54	2.65

Note: ^aestimated marginal means are shown. *𝑃<.05; **𝑃<.01; ***𝑃<.0001.