Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Different Cohorts of Students

Table 1

Summary of the program participants’ perceptions toward the program content.

	Respondents with positive responses (options 4–6)
	S1		S2		S3		Overall
	n	%	n	%	n	%	N	%
(1) The objectives of the curriculum are very clear	26,181	85.98	22,387	84.33	21,933	85.66	70,501	85.32
(2) The design of the curriculum is very good	25,224	82.88	21,351	80.49	21,176	82.72	67,751	82.03
(3) The activities were carefully planned	25,664	84.47	21,779	82.21	21,504	84.10	68,947	83.59
(4) The classroom atmosphere was very pleasant	24,977	82.29	21,568	81.56	21,410	83.81	67,955	82.55
(5) There was much peer interaction amongst the students	25,078	82.86	21,612	81.95	21,380	83.90	68,070	82.90
(6) I participated actively during lessons (including discussions, sharing, games, etc.)	25,110	82.60	21,246	80.26	21,048	82.36	67,404	81.74
(7) I was encouraged to do my best	24,085	79.24	20,425	77.08	20,358	79.63	64,868	78.65
(8) The learning experience I encountered enhanced my interest toward the lessons	24,168	79.70	20,425	77.24	20,398	79.96	64,991	78.97
(9) Overall speaking, I have very positive evaluation of the program	24,092	79.33	20,592	77.76	20,489	80.16	65,173	79.08
(10) On the whole, I like this curriculum very much	24,305	80.25	20,672	78.22	20,530	80.49	65,507	79.65

All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: slightly disagree; 4: slightly agree; 5: agree; 6: strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4–6) are shown in the table. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level.