The Scientific World Journal / 2012 / Article / Tab 1

Research Article

Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Different Cohorts of Students

Table 1

Summary of the program participants’ perceptions toward the program content.

Respondents with positive responses (options 4–6)

(1) The objectives of the curriculum are very clear26,18185.9822,38784.3321,93385.6670,50185.32
(2) The design of the curriculum is very good25,22482.8821,35180.4921,17682.7267,75182.03
(3) The activities were carefully planned25,66484.4721,77982.2121,50484.1068,94783.59
(4) The classroom atmosphere was very pleasant24,97782.2921,56881.5621,41083.8167,95582.55
(5) There was much peer interaction amongst the students25,07882.8621,61281.9521,38083.9068,07082.90
(6) I participated actively during lessons (including discussions, sharing, games, etc.)25,11082.6021,24680.2621,04882.3667,40481.74
(7) I was encouraged to do my best24,08579.2420,42577.0820,35879.6364,86878.65
(8) The learning experience I encountered enhanced my interest toward the lessons24,16879.7020,42577.2420,39879.9664,99178.97
(9) Overall speaking, I have very positive evaluation of the program24,09279.3320,59277.7620,48980.1665,17379.08
(10) On the whole, I like this curriculum very much24,30580.2520,67278.2220,53080.4965,50779.65

All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: slightly disagree; 4: slightly agree; 5: agree; 6: strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4–6) are shown in the table. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level.

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.