Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Different Cohorts of Students

Table 2

Summary of the program participants’ perceptions toward the program implementers.

	Respondents with positive responses (options 4–6)
	S1		S2		S3		Overall
	n	%	n	%	n	%	N	%
(1) The instructor(s) had a good mastery of the curriculum	26,689	87.72	22,957	86.62	22,661	88.66	72,307	87.67
(2) The instructor(s) was well prepared for the lessons	27,119	89.15	23,263	87.75	22,822	89.29	73,204	88.73
(3) The instructor(s)’ teaching skills were good	26,688	87.87	22,676	85.62	22,421	87.83	71,785	87.11
(4) The instructor(s) showed good professional attitudes	27,077	89.10	23,204	87.56	22,805	89.31	73,086	88.66
(5) The instructor(s) was very involved	27,283	89.76	23,400	88.38	23,007	90.17	73,690	89.44
(6) The instructor(s) encouraged students to participate in the activities	27,255	89.73	23,265	87.80	22,842	89.46	73,362	89.00
(7) The instructor(s) cared for the students	26,602	87.60	22,726	85.79	22,384	87.66	71,712	87.02
(8) The instructor(s) was ready to offer help to students when needed	27,101	89.24	23,235	87.74	22,882	89.61	73,218	88.86
(9) The instructor(s) had much interaction with the students	26,127	85.99	22,429	84.68	22,205	86.99	70,761	85.89
(10) Overall speaking, I have very positive evaluation of the instructors	27,016	88.83	23,326	87.97	22,915	89.67	73,257	88.82

All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: slightly disagree; 4: slightly agree; 5: agree; 6: strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4–6) are shown in the table. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level.