Research Article

Qualitative Evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S.: An Integration of Findings Based on Program Participants

Table 4

Metaphors used by participants to describe the program.

Nature of responseNo. of responses towards the nature of metaphor
2005/06 (EIP-S1)2006/07 (FIP-S1)2007/08 (FIP-S2)2007/08 (EIP-S3)Total (%)

Positive items (%)27363214109
 (e.g., mirror, stair, rainbow, sunshine after rain)(77.1)(51.4)(56.1)(53.8)(58)
Negative items (%)5917536
  (e.g., beat each other, invisible pen, disappointment,
 talking tactics on paper)
(14.3)(12.9)(14.0)(19.2)(19.1)
Neutral items (%)3258743
  (e.g., train, watching movie, parenting, medicine)(8.6)(35.7)(29.8)(26.9)(22.9)
Undecided items (%)00000
  (e.g., zip file, white paper)

Total count (%)35 (100)70 (100)57 (100)26 (100)188 (100)

No. of codes derived from the metaphor

Positive items (%)33584324158
 (e.g., mirror, stair, rainbow, sunshine after rain)(82.5)(66.7)(57.3)(60)(65.3)
Negative items (%)4824541
 (e.g., beat each other, invisible pen, disappointment,
 talking tactics on paper)
(10)(9.2)(32)(12.5)(16.9)
Neutral items (%)32171041
  (e.g., train, watching movie, parenting, medicine)(7.5)(24.1)(9.3)(25)(16.9)
Undecided items (%)00112
  (e.g., zip file, white paper)(1.3)(2.5)(0.8)

Total count (%)40 (100)87 (100)75 (100)40 (100)242 (100)