Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 571596, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/571596
Research Article

INVO Procedure: Minimally Invasive IVF as an Alternative Treatment Option for Infertile Couples

Centro Colombiano de Fertilidad y Esterilidad (CECOLFES) S.A.S., Calle 102 No. 14A-15, 56769 Bogotá, Colombia

Received 15 October 2011; Accepted 8 December 2011

Academic Editor: João B. A. Oliveira

Copyright © 2012 Elkin Lucena et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Ranoux, F. X. Aubriot, J. B. Dubuisson et al., “A new in vitro fertilization technique: intravaginal culture,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 654–657, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Fukuda, K. Fukuda, and C. Ranoux, “Unexpected low oxygen tension of intravaginal culture,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1293–1295, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Frydman and C. Ranoux, “INVO: a simple, low cost effective assisted reproductive technology,” ESHRE Monographs, vol. 1, Article ID den163, pp. 85–89, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Sterzik, B. Rosenbusch, V. Sasse, A. Wolf, H. M. Beier, and C. Lauritzen, “A new variation of in-vitro fertilization: intravaginal culture of human oocytes and cleavage stages,” Human Reproduction, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 83–86, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Ranoux and M. M. Seibel, “New techniques in fertilization: intravaginal culture and microvolume straw,” Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6–8, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. H. M. Wiegerinck, E. Moret, P. A. van Dop, M. Wijnberg, and C. D. M. B. Beerendonk, “Intra vaginal culture (IVC), the Eindhoven experience,” in Ovulation to Implantation, J. H. L. Evers and M. J. Heineman, Eds., pp. 349–351, BV: Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  7. G. Freude, B. Artner, and S. Leodolter, “Intravaginal culture to facilitate IVF,” Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 140, no. 20, pp. 498–501, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. L. Costoya, C. M. Cafatti, and A. A. Gadan, “Experience with intravaginal culture for in vitro fertilization (IVF),” Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 360–361, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. L. Taymor, C. J. Ranoux, and G. L. Gross, “Natural oocyte retrieval with intravaginal fertilization: a simplified approach to in vitro fertilization,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 888–891, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Sharma and J. Hewitt, “Intravaginal culture for IVF,” Bombay Hospital Journal, vol. 35, pp. 155–160, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  11. F. Batres, M. Mahadevan, M. Maris, M. Miller, and D. Moutos, “Stimulated cycle intravaginal culture fertilization in an office setting. A preliminary study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 68, supplement 1, p. S168, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. L. Bonaventura, P. Ahlering, R. Morris, J. Mouchel, M. Scheiber, and J. Batzofin, “The INVOcell, a new medical device for intra vaginal fertilization and culture,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 3, supplement 2, p. S164, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Lucena, A. M. Saa, D. E. Navarro, C. Pulido, and A. Moran, “The new era in ART: INVO,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, supplement 4, p. S36, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  14. INVO Bioscience, INVO Cell Device: Instructions for Use P-008 Rev 7 (B ooklet), INVO Bioscience, Beverly, Mass, USA, 2007.
  15. J. Sirois, K. Sayasith, K. A. Brown, A. E. Stock, N. Bouchard, and M. Doré, “Cyclooxygenase-2 and its role in ovulation: a 2004 account,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 373–385, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Feichtinger and P. Kemeter, “Transvaginal sector scan sonography for needle guided transvaginal follicle aspiration and other applications in gynecologic routine and research,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 722–725, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. L. Veek, “The human oocyte,” in An Atlas of Human Gametes and Conceptuses: An Illustrated Reference for Assisted Reproductive Technology, L. L. Veeck, Ed., pp. 20–21, Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, NY, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. World Health Organization and Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, vol. 56–58, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 5th edition, 2010.
  19. E. Lucena, D. P. Bernal, C. Lucena, A. Rojas, A. Moran, and A. Lucena, “Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 108–111, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Division of Reproductive Health, 2008 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report, 2009, http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2008/.
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Division of Reproductive Health, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report. 2009 National Summary Report, 2010, http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/art/Apps/NationalSummaryReport.aspx.
  22. B. Bavister, “Oxygen concentration and preimplantation development,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 484–486, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Meintjes, S. J. Chantilis, J. D. Douglas et al., “A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. U. Waldenström, A. B. Engström, D. Hellberg, and S. Nilsson, “Low-oxygen compared with high-oxygen atmosphere in blastocyst culture, a prospective randomized study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 2461–2465, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Kovačič, M. C. Sajko, and V. Vlaisavljević, “A prospective, randomized trial on the effect of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 511–519, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. W. Yang, K. J. Hwang, H. C. Kwon, H. S. Kim, K. W. Choi, and K. S. Oh, “Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis in human fragmented embryos,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 998–1002, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. J. Leese, “Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Fischer and B. D. Bavister, “Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 673–679, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. E. Swain, “Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Q. Zhang, X. L. Li, Y. Peng, X. Guo, B. C. Heng, and G. Q. Tong, “Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 510–515, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. K. Gardner, M. Lane, I. Calderon, and J. Leeton, “Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 349–353, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. L. Peddie and E. van Teijlingen, “Qualitative research in fertility and reproduction: does it have any value?” Human Fertility, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 263–267, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Jain, B. L. Harlow, and M. D. Hornstein, “Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 9, pp. 661–666, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. O. Hovatta and I. Cooke, “Cost-effective approaches to in vitro fertilization: means to improve access,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 287–291, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus