Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Extension Phase) Based on the Perspective of Program Implementer

Table 1

Summary of the program implementers’ perception towards the program.

	Respondents with positive responses (options 4–6)
	S1		S2		S3		Overall
	𝑛	%	𝑛	%	𝑛	%	𝑁	%
(1) The objectives of the curriculum are very clear.	1214	95.37	979	94.86	887	93.96	3080	94.80
(2) The design of the curriculum is very good.	1125	88.37	873	84.68	803	85.06	2801	86.24
(3) The activities were carefully planned.	1160	91.19	924	89.71	854	90.47	2938	90.51
(4) The classroom atmosphere was very pleasant.	1156	90.95	897	87.17	796	84.50	2849	87.88
(5) There was much peer interaction amongst the students.	1127	88.74	875	84.87	776	82.73	2778	85.77
(6) Students participated actively during lessons (including discussions, sharing, games, etc.).	1121	88.06	866	84.00	755	80.15	2742	84.47
(7) The program has a strong and sound theoretical support.	1090	85.69	889	86.06	812	86.11	2791	85.93
(8) The teaching experience I encountered enhanced my interest in the course.	1051	82.76	826	80.19	751	79.64	2628	81.04
(9) Overall speaking, I have very positive evaluation of the program.	1071	84.26	839	81.30	756	80.08	2666	82.11
(10) On the whole, students like this curriculum very much.	1086	85.38	816	79.15	729	77.31	2631	81.05

Note: all items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, and 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4–6) are shown in the table. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level.