Research Article

Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Extension Phase) Based on the Perspective of Program Implementer

Table 3

Summary of the program implementers’ perception towards the program effectiveness.

The extent to which the Tier 1 Program (i.e., the program in which all students have joined) has helped your studentsRespondents with positive responses (options 3–5)
S1S2S3Overall
𝑛 % 𝑛 % 𝑛 % 𝑁 %

(1) It has strengthened students’ bonding with teachers, classmates, and their families.116391.7993290.5784690.00294190.88
(2) It has strengthened students’ resilience in adverse conditions.112789.0290587.7882988.19293691.84
(3) It has enhanced students’ social competence.118593.5394191.6385490.95254193.73
(4) It has improved students’ ability in handling.116491.9493490.7784289.77210888.83
(5) It has enhanced students’ cognitive competence.111888.3888786.0383188.50196472.74
(6) Students’ ability to resist harmful influences has been improved.112689.0889987.3781486.69200464.79
(7) It has strengthened students’ ability to distinguish between the good and the bad.118193.2194891.9585691.36246376.37
(8) It has increased students’ competence in making sensible and wise choices.115291.0791588.9283889.15293890.79
(9) It has helped students to have life reflections.110487.4890988.3483989.26291791.61
(10) It has reinforced students’ self-confidence.106383.9783581.0776981.81238986.31
(11) It has increased students’ self- awareness.117993.8793790.9786491.91224390.52
(12) It has helped students to face the future with a positive attitude.109186.7288485.9181887.11191674.35
(13) It has helped students to cultivate compassion and care about others.110988.2390387.8482387.55199563.58
(14) It has encouraged students to care about the community.103282.2384682.1476581.30220568.46
(15) It has promoted students’ sense of responsibility in serving the society.103081.9484381.7777982.78271284.07
(16) It has enriched the overall development of the students.118994.6795392.4387793.20304495.27

Note: all items are on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 = unhelpful, 2 = not very helpful, 3 = slightly helpful, 4 = helpful, and 5 = very helpful. Only respondents with positive responses (Options 3–5) are shown in the table. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level.