Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 612965, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/612965
Research Article

Modeling Rare Species Distribution at the Edge: The Case for the Vulnerable Endemic Pyrenean Desman in France

1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
2Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, UFR Sciences & Techniques Côte Basque, Campus Montaury, 64600 Anglet, France
3INRA UMR ECOBIOP, Quartier Ibarron, 64310 Saint-Pée sur Nivelle, France
4SUC au CERFACS, URA CERFACS/CNRS no.1875, 42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse Cedex 01, France
5ABELA, 09320 Boussenac, France
6Conservatoire Régional des Espaces Naturels de Midi-Pyrénées, 75, voie du Toec, BP 57611, 31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France

Received 11 October 2011; Accepted 13 November 2011

Academic Editors: R. Castiglia, Q. Guo, B. Krystufek, and B. Tóthmérész

Copyright © 2012 M. Williams-Tripp et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Barbosa, R. Real, and J. Mario Vargas, “Transferability of environmental favourability models in geographic space: the case of the Iberian desman (Galemys pyrenaicus) in Portugal and Spain,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 220, no. 5, pp. 747–754, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. M. Barbosa, R. Real, and J. M. Vargas, “Erratum to “Transferability of environmental favourability models in geographic space: the case of the Iberian desman (Galemys pyrenaicus) in Portugal and Spain“ [Ecol. Model. 220 (2009) 747-754],” Ecological Modelling, vol. 222, no. 4, p. 1067, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Fernandes, J. Herrero, S. Aulagnier, and G. Amori, “Galemys pyrenaicus,” In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1., http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
  4. IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1, http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
  5. M. J. Cabral, J. Almeida, P. R. Almeida et al., Livro Vermelho dos Vertebrados de Portugal, Instituto da Conservação de Natureza, Lisboa, Portugal, 2005.
  6. C. Nores, A. I. Queiroz, and J. Gisbert, “Galemys pyrenaicus (E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1811),” in Atlas de los Mamíferos Terrestres de España, L. J. Palomo and J. Gisbert, Eds., pp. 70–73, Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza- SECEM-SECEMU, Madrid, Spain, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Maurin and P. Keith, Inventaire de la Faune Menacée en France—Le Livre Rouge, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle / WWF / Nathan, Paris, France, 1994.
  8. A. I. Queiroz, C. M. Quaresma, C. P. Santos, A. J. Barbosa, and H. M. Carvalho, Bases Para a Conservação da Toupeira-de-água, Galemys Pyrenaicus, vol. 27. ICN, Estudos de Biologia e Conservação da Natureza, Lisbon, Portugal, 1998.
  9. Anonymous, “Bases para una estrategia nacional de conservacion del Desman iberico, Galemys pyrenaicus,” Actividades 2009/2010. Associacion GALEMIA, pp. 26, 2008.
  10. M. Némoz and A. Bertrand, “Plan national d'Actions en faveur du Desman des Pyrénées (Galemys pyrenaicus), 2010–2015. Société Française pour l'Etude et la Protection des Mammifères / Ministère de l'Ecologie, de l'Energie, du Developpement Durable et de l'Aménagement du Territoire,” pp. 159, 2009.
  11. J. H. Brown, “On the relationship beween abundance and distribution of species,” American Naturalist, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 255–279, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Václavík and R. K. Meentemeyer, “Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?” Ecological Modelling, vol. 220, no. 23, pp. 3248–3258, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. I. MacKenzie, “What are the issues with presence-absence data for wildlife managers?” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 849–860, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. McDonald-Madden, P. W. J. Baxter, R. A. Fuller et al., “Monitoring does not always count,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 547–550, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Lomba, L. Pellissier, C. Randin et al., “Overcoming the rare species modelling paradox: a novel hierarchical framework applied to an Iberian endemic plant,” Biological Conservation, vol. 143, no. 11, pp. 2647–2657, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Elith and J. R. Leathwick, “Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 40, pp. 677–697, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Miller, “Species distribution modeling,” Geography Compass, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 490–509, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Schroder and O. Richter, “Are habitat models transferable in space and time?” Zeitschrift fur Okologie und Naturschutz, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 195–205, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. F. Randin, T. Dirnböck, S. Dullinger, N. E. Zimmermann, M. Zappa, and A. Guisan, “Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space?” Journal of Biogeography, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1689–1703, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Morueta-Holme, C. Flöjgaard, and J. C. Svenning, “Climate change risks and conservation implications for a threatened small-range mammal species,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 4, Article ID e10360, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. W. Tingley and S. R. Beissinger, “Detecting range shifts from historical species occurrences: new perspectives on old data,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 625–633, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Real, A. M. Barbosa, and J. M. Vargas, “Obtaining environmental favourability functions from logistic regression,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 237–245, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Bertrand, Répartition Géographique et Ecologie Alimentaire du Desman des Pyrénées Galemys pyrenaicus (Geoffroy, 1811) dans les Pyrénées françaises, Diplôme Universitaire de Recherche, Toulouse, France, 1994.
  24. J. BoÉ, L. Terray, E. Martin, and F. Habets, “Projected changes in components of the hydrological cycle in French river basins during the 21st century,” Water Resources Research, vol. 45, no. 8, Article ID W08426, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Pagé, L. Terray, and J BoÉ, “dsclim: a software package to downscale climate scenarios at regional scale using a weather-typing based statistical methodology,” Tech. Rep. 1875, Toulouse, France, 2009, TR/CMGC/09/21. SUC au CERFACS, URA CERFACS/CNRS. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. Kistler, E. Kalnay, W. Collins et al., “The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 247–267, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Quintana-Seguí, P. Le Moigne, Y. Durand et al., “Analysis of near-surface atmospheric variables: validation of the SAFRAN analysis over France,” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 92–107, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. O. Allouche, A. Tsoar, and R. Kadmon, “Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS),” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1223–1232, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. H. Fielding and P. F. Haworth, “Testing the generality of bird-habitat models,” Conservation Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1466–1481, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Liu, M. White, and G. Newell, “Measuring the accuracy of species distribution models: a review,” in Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, July 2009, http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim09/.
  31. J. Elith and C. H. Graham, “Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? on finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models,” Ecography, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. J. Phillips, R. P. Anderson, and R. E. Schapire, “Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 190, no. 3-4, pp. 231–259, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Dirnböck, S. Dullinger, and G. Grabherr, “A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation,” Journal of Biogeography, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 401–417, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. I. Segura, A. Rocha-Olivares, S. Flores-Ramírez, and L. Rojas-Bracho, “Conservation implications of the genetic and ecological distinction of Tursiops truncatus ecotypes in the Gulf of California,” Biological Conservation, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 336–346, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. L. Hartl and A. G. Clark, Principles of Population Genetics, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 4th edition, 2007.
  36. O. M. W. Richmond, J. P. McEntee, R. J. Hijmans, and J. S. Brashares, “Is the climate right for pleistocene rewilding? using species distribution models to extrapolate climatic suitability for mammals across continents,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 9, Article ID e12899, pp. 1–11, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. A. Saunders, R. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules, “Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review,” Conservation Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. L. Lövei, T. Magura, B. Tóthmérész, and V. Ködöböcz, “The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in habitat islands,” Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 283–289, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus