Research Article

Helping Adolescents with Greater Psychosocial Needs: Subjective Outcome Evaluation Based on Different Cohorts

Table 1

Description of data characteristics from 2005 to 2009.

S1S2S3
2005/2006 EIP2006/2007 FIP2007/2008 FIP2008/2009 FIP2006/2007 EIP2007/2008 FIP2008/2009 FIP2007/2008 EIP2008/2009 FIP

Total schools that joined P.A.T.H.S.52207213*1974919619848167
 (i) 10-h program23951081042711311029104
 (ii) 20-h program29112105932283881963
Tier 2 Program
Mean no. of sessions of program implementation19.53
(1–63)
22.91
(6–62)
22.71
(8–120)
22.11
(5–76)
22.63
(1–62)
23.13
(5–119)
22.04
(5–77)
22.77
(10–55)
23.39
(5–90)
Hours per session1.5–31.5–31.5–31.5–31.5–31.5–31.5–31.5–31.5–3
Total no. of participants3,07213,19415,49416,4522,54212,49014,6122,11413,031
 (i) Students2,71812,09213,03214,1922,43911,34713,3822,11412,062
 (ii) Adults3541,1022,4622,2601031,1431,2300969
Mean no. of participants per school59.08
(21–274)
63.74
(14–308)
72.74
(13–360)
83.51
(3–1272)
51.88
(17–240)
63.72
(10–435)
73.80
(15–351)
44.04
(6–93)
78.03
(9–406)
Total no. of respondents2,17310,2559,9319,2161,8988,4859,1661,7397,378
Mean no. of student respondents per school41.79 (20–151)49.54 (6–294)46.84 (7–198)46.78 (3–215)38.73 (8–199)43.29 (7–196)46.29 (7–281)36.23 (2–136)44.18 (5–222)

Note. S1: Secondary 1 level; S2: Secondary 2 level; S3: Secondary 3 level; EIP: Experimental Implementation Phase, FIP: Full Implementation Phase.
*In the 2007/2008 school year, only 212 schools submitted the Tier 2 evaluation reports.