Helping Adolescents with Greater Psychosocial Needs: Subjective Outcome Evaluation Based on Different Cohorts

Table 4

Summary of the students’ perception towards the worker(s).

		Respondents with positive responses (Options 4–6)
		S1		S2		S3		Overall
		𝑛	%	𝑛	%	𝑛	%	𝑛	%
(1)	The worker(s) has professional knowledge.	27,850	88.73	17,656	90.84	8,411	92.90	53,917	90.82
(2)	The worker(s) demonstrated good working skills.	27,373	87.26	17,488	90.03	8,312	91.84	53,173	89.71
(3)	The worker(s) was well prepared for the program.	28,153	89.81	17,765	91.58	8,419	93.03	54,337	91.47
(4)	The worker(s) understood the needs of the participants.	27,259	87.02	17,302	89.15	8,301	91.83	52,862	89.33
(5)	The worker(s) cared about the participants.	27,655	88.29	17,553	90.45	8,372	92.57	53,580	90.44
(6)	The worker(s)’ attitudes were very good.	27,733	88.57	17,580	90.66	8,421	93.09	53,734	90.77
(7)	The worker(s) had much interaction with me.	26,470	84.49	16,926	87.31	8,123	89.84	51,519	87.21
(8)	On the whole, I am satisfied with the worker(s).	28,113	89.63	17,736	91.34	8,438	93.35	54,287	91.44

Note. All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (Options 4–6) are shown in the table.