Research Article
Evaluation of Land Use Regression Models for Nitrogen Dioxide and Benzene in Four US Cities
Table 3
Model
and significant variables (5% level) in NO
2 and benzene LURs.
| Model (%) | El Paso | Detroit | Dallas | Cleveland | NO2 | benzene | NO2 | benzene | NO2 | benzene | NO2 | 97 | 93 | 82 | 43 | 34a/48b | 72a/49b | 96 |
| Distance to nearest low traffic road | | | | | | | | Distance to nearest medium traffic road | | | ▼
c | ▼ | ▲/ | | ▲ | Distance to nearest high traffic road | | | ▲d | | ▼/ | ▼/ | | Traffic intensity within set buffers | ▲ | | | | ▲/▲ | ▲/ | ▲ | Length of local roads within set buffers | | | | | | | ▼ | Length of secondary roads within set buffers | | | | | | | ▼ | Open area within set radii | | | | | | | ▼ | Population density within census block group or set radii | ▲ | ▲ | | ▲ | | | | Point source (categorical or continuous) | ▼ and ▲e | ▼ and ▲ | ▼ | ▼ | ▼/▼ | | ♦f | Elevation | | | | | | | | Distance to nearest international border crossing | ▼ | ▼ | ▼ | ▲ | | | | Season | | | | | | | ♦ | Seasonal interaction of point source and population density categories | | | | | | | ♦ |
|
|
aSummer.
bWinter.
cSignificant (5% level) decrease.
dSignificant (5% level) increase.
eDecrease followed by increase.
fCategorical variables (significant 5% level).
|