Research Article

Physiological and Growth Responses of Six Turfgrass Species Relative to Salinity Tolerance

Table 4

Effect of salinity on leaf proline content of six turfgrass species.

E C 𝑤
(dS m−1)
Turfgrass species (proline contents in mg g−1, fresh weight)
P. vaginatumZ. japonicaZ. matrellaD. didactylaC. dactylon “Tifdwarf”C. dactylon “Satiri”LSD (0.05)

03.33 f3.60 d3.67 f3.55 e5.60 f6.35 e0.96
8 4.60 ef (1.4)4.07 d (1.1)4.62 f (1.3)6.42 e (1.8)7.25 f (1.3)10.60 e (1.7)2.31
167.80 ed (2.3)6.50 d (1.8)6.02e (1.7)12.40 d (3.5)15.35 e (2.7)29.90 d (4.7)3.65
2411.61 d (3.5)13.10 c (3.6)9.24 d (2.5)15.05 d (4.2)26.35 d (4.7)52.50 c (8.3)1.77
3226.90 c (8.1)16.25 c (4.5)11.30 c (3.1)34.55 c (9.7)37.57 c (6.7)66.52 b (10.5)3.53
4051.20 b (15.4)45.82 b (12.7)25.57 b (7.0)43.27 b (12.2)65.15 b (11.2)71.35 a (11.2)4.09
4877.90 a (23.4)49.62 a (13.8)43.52 a (12.0)49.92 a (14.1)62.57 a (11.6)74.85 a (11.8)5.18

LSD (0.05)4.453.261.263.491.934.43

Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 𝑃 = 0 . 0 5 (LSD test).
Values in the parentheses indicate x-fold increase relative to the control.