Clinical Study

Different Cardiovascular Responses to a Resistance Training Session in Hypertensive Women Receiving Propanolol Compared with Normotensive Controls

Table 3

Cardiovascular responses to an acute resistance training session in the hypertensive women using propanolol (H Group).

PeriodSBPDBPHRRPP

Resting125 ± 10.8a83 ± 10.663 ± 5.8a7.800 ± 935.4a
Set 1146 ± 11.790 ± 9.479 ± 8.7 1 1 . 5 0 0 ± 1 8 1 7 . 6
Set 2143 ± 8.289 ± 5.785 ± 10.4 1 2 . 0 0 0 ± 1 5 8 3 . 2
Set 3152 ± 9.288 ± 7.982 ± 11.8 1 2 . 4 0 0 ± 1 9 6 3 . 5
5′ after111 ± 9.9*74 ± 7.0a61 ± 4.4a 6 . 7 0 0 ± 8 2 1 . 5 *
30′ after 117 ± 9.5a79 ± 7.4a59 ± 5.3a 6 . 9 0 0 ± 8 7 5 . 3 *

Mean ± standard deviation of the mean. *Different from resting, set 1, 2, and 3; adifferent from set 1, 2, and 3, 𝑃 0 . 0 5 . SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, HR: heart rate, RPP: rate-pressure product.