Program Implementers' Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Findings Based on Different Datasets over Time
Table 2
Summary of the program implementersโ perceptions towards the program.
Respondents with positive responses (options 4โ6)
S1
S2
S3
Overall
(1)
The objectives of the curriculum were very clear
3,865
94.45
2,437
94.02
1,149
93.72
7,451
94.06
(2)
The design of the curriculum was very good
3,416
83.52
2,144
82.94
1,031
84.09
6,591
83.52
(3)
The activities were carefully planned
3,634
88.87
2,289
88.48
1,076
87.98
6,999
88.44
(4)
The classroom atmosphere was very pleasant
3,564
87.40
2,182
84.38
1,009
82.77
6,755
84.85
(5)
There was much peer interaction among the students
3,516
86.18
2,174
84.20
1,009
83.18
6,699
84.52
(6)
Students participated actively during lessons (including discussions, sharing, games, etc.)
3,496
85.88
2,104
81.65
974
80.30
6,574
82.61
(7)
The program had a strong and sound theoretical support
3,496
86.02
2,180
84.86
1,043
86.06
6,719
85.65
(8)
The teaching experience I encountered enhanced my interest in the course
3,234
79.60
2,010
78.39
953
78.76
6,197
78.92
(9)
Overall speaking, I have a very positive evaluation of the program
3,222
78.99
2,033
78.71
948
78.15
6,203
78.62
(10)
On the whole, students liked this curriculum very much
3,236
79.57
1,969
76.67
920
75.85
6,125
77.36
Note: All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4โ6) are shown in the table.
