Research Article

Program Implementers' Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Findings Based on Different Datasets over Time

Table 3

Summary of the program implementersโ€™ perceptions towards their own performance.

Respondents with positive responses (options 4โ€“6)
S1S2S3Overall
๐‘› % ๐‘› % ๐‘› % ๐‘› %

(1)I had a good mastery of the curriculum3,50786.382,21286.441,01684.536,73585.78
(2)I was well prepared for the lessons3,56388.132,26288.601,03085.836,85587.52
(3)My teaching skills were good3,56788.712,22688.231,02486.636,81787.86
(4)I have good professional attitudes3,90196.612,44496.261,13995.717,48496.19
(5)I was very involved3,80494.162,36793.041,08591.187,25692.79
(6)I gained a lot during the course of instruction3,41084.702,13283.9098683.146,52883.91
(7)I cared for the students3,99098.662,50198.351,17198.077,66298.36
(8)I was ready to offer help to students when needed4,00098.992,51298.661,17398.167,68598.60
(9)I had much interaction with the students3,75993.092,33191.741,08691.117,17691.98
(10)Overall speaking, I have a very positive evaluation of myself as an instructor3,87695.772,38994.021,11994.037,38494.61

Note: All items are on a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = slightly disagree, 4 = slightly agree, 5 = agree, 6 = strongly agree. Only respondents with positive responses (options 4โ€“6) are shown in the table.