Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012, Article ID 934679, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/934679
Research Article

Postlecture Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Subject for University Students in Hong Kong

1Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
2Public Policy Research Institute, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
3Department of Social Work, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
4Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau
5Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40506, USA

Received 30 September 2011; Accepted 15 October 2011

Academic Editor: Joav Merrick

Copyright © 2012 Daniel T. L. Shek. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. T. L. Shek and R. C. F. Sun, “Subjective outcome evaluation based on secondary data analyses: the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 10, pp. 224–237, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. T. L. Shek and R. C. F. Sun, “Development, implementation and evaluation of a holistic positive youth development program: project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 107–117, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. T. L. Shek and C. M. S. Ma, “Subjective outcome evaluation findings: factors related to the perceived effectiveness of the tier 2 program of the project P.A.T.H.S,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 10, pp. 250–260, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. T. L. Shek and H. K. Ma, “Subjective outcome evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on the perspective of the program participants,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 7, pp. 47–55, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. A. Cohen, “Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: a meta-analysis of multi-section validity studies,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 281–309, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  6. H. W. Marsh and L. A. Roche, “Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: the critical issues of validity, bias, and utility,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1187–1197, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. W. Marsh, K. T. Hau, C. M. Chung, and T. L. P. Siu, “Students' evaluations of university teaching: chinese version of the students' evaluations of educational quality instrument,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 568–572, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. W. Marsh, K. T. Hau, C. M. Chung, and T. L. P. Siu, “Confirmatory factor analyses of Chinese students' evaluations of university teaching,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143–164, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Kim, E. Damewood, and N. Hodge, “Professor attitude: its effect on teaching evaluations,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 458–473, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  10. D. Kember, D. Y. P. Leung, and K. P. Kwan, “Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 411–425, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Kember and D. Y. P. Leung, “Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 341–353, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. C. F. Sun and D. T. L. Shek, “Life satisfaction, positive youth development, and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong,” Social Indicators Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 455–474, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. T. L. Shek and C. M. S. Ma, “Impact of the project P.A.T.H.S. in the junior secondary school years: individual growth curve analyses,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 11, pp. 253–266, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. T. L. Shek and L. Yu, “Prevention of adolescent problem behavior: longitudinal impact of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 11, pp. 546–567, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. T. L. Shek and C. S. M. Ng, “Early identification of adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: an evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong,” International Journal of Disability and Human Development, vol. 9, pp. 291–299, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. T. L. Shek, C. S. M. Ng, and P. F. Tsui, “Qualitative evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on focus groups,” International Journal of Disability and Human Development, vol. 9, pp. 307–313, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Royse, Research Methods in Social Work, Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA, 2004.
  18. P. Gendreau, C. Goggin, and P. Smith, “The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: program implementation,” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 180–187, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. F. Donnermeyer and T. N. Wurschmidt, “Educators' perceptions of the D.A.R.E. program,” Journal of Drug Education, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 259–276, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Berkel, A. M. Mauricio, E. Schoenfelder, and I. N. Sandler, “Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation,” Prevention Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. A. Durlak and E. P. DuPre, “Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation,” American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 327–350, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. F. Byrnes, B. A. Miller, A. E. Aalborg, A. V. Plasencia, and C. D. Keagy, “Implementation fidelity in adolescent family-based prevention programs: relationship to family engagement,” Health Education Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 531–541, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. T. L. Shek, “Nurturing holistic development of university students in Hong Kong: where are we and where should we go?” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 10, pp. 563–575, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus