Postlecture Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Subject for University Students in Hong Kong

Table 1

Percentage findings based on subjective outcome evaluation of each lecture.

	Percentage of positive responses for different lectures
Item	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	Overall
(1) Good lecture design	95.6	91.4	83.7	87.1	90.0	93.7	93.8	91.4	93.5	95.2	93.9	87.3	84.2	91.0
(2) Atmosphere was very good	94.3	95.0	80.1	80.6	77.3	84.1	86.0	92.6	89.9	90.3	82.4	83.9	80.9	86.7
(3) Much peer interaction	94.3	95.0	83.2	91.6	80.7	84.9	89.9	93.2	89.9	91.6	85.0	76.7	76.8	88.1
(4) Interested in the content	88.5	88.2	84.7	76.8	87.2	92.1	89.1	93.2	86.9	92.4	85.8	87.3	83.2	87.4
(5) Much student participation	93.8	95.9	85.1	84.5	76.6	82.5	86.8	86.3	91.1	91.7	81.1	75.4	74.7	86.3
(6) Many opportunities for reflection	81.4	89.6	82.7	81.7	86.4	92.9	88.4	85.7	91.1	87.6	81.6	77.1	72.3	84.9
(7) Helpful to my personal development	89.9	90.5	88.6	84.5	89.4	95.2	86.0	88.3	89.3	88.1	88.5	89.0	78.9	88.5
(8) Lecturer had good mastery of lecture	95.2	94.1	93.1	89.7	90.8	96.0	93.8	91.4	93.4	96.6	89.9	86.3	86.3	92.4
(9) Varied teaching methods used	93.0	96.8	89.6	92.9	84.4	87.2	90.6	90.1	92.3	90.3	91.2	84.7	86.3	90.6
(10) Helpful to students (knowledge)	94.7	92.3	93.1	89.7	90.8	95.2	94.5	91.4	92.9	93.1	91.2	89.8	81.1	91.9
(11) Very positive evaluation of the lecturer	95.6	95.0	91.1	92.9	90.8	94.4	96.9	95.1	94.0	92.4	92.6	87.3	83.2	92.9
(12) Very positive evaluation of the lecture	93.0	93.2	86.6	87.7	89.4	92.9	88.4	94.4	92.8	93.1	89.2	89.0	80.0	90.4
Coefficient alpha for the 12-item scale	.93	.93	.94	.95	.95	.95	.94	.93	.94	.94	.94	.95	.97	.94
Mean interitem correlation	.54	.52	.57	.59	.60	.62	.57	.53	.59	.57	.57	.63	.71	.58
Number of questionnaires collected	227	222	202	155	141	126	129	162	169	145	148	118	95	2039

Note: The cumulative percentage based on “Strongly Agree”, “Agree” and “Slightly Agree” for an item is presented for each lecture.