Table 2: Comparison of different array configurations at DNI: 641 W/m2.

Simulation no.Array configurationFlux distribution (W)Fill factor (FF) (%) (V) (A) (V) (A)Power density /no. cells (W/cell)

1 A 79.3639.7477.771.02137.711.451.65
2 A 82.0941.8252.981.5568.882.851.71
3 A 91.2454.9630.722.9734.444.821.90
4 A 113.6268.9515.367.417.229.572.37
5 ( ) and ( )B 86.0153.1515.45.5817.279.371.95
6 ( ) and ( )B 113.6457.7125.684.4328.796.842.58
7 ( ) and ( )B 71.6320.246.221.5551.836.841.63
8 ( ) and ( )B 71.0910.6261.861.4297.96.841.62
9 ( ) and ( )B 81.6938.149.07923.039.31.86
10 ( ) and ( )B 85.6351.3319.354.4334.544.831.95
114 × 3 ( ) and ( )B 79.5840.2951.361.5557.583.431.81
124 × 3 ( ) and ( )B 76.9921.6666.991.15103.653.431.75
136 × 2 ( ) and ( )B 76.2928.298.47928.789.371.73
146 × 2 ( ) and ( )B 82.9742.6418.754.4340.294.831.89
156 × 2 ( ) and ( )B 87.5347.1756.491.5563.332.931.99
16 ( ) and ( )B 82.8831.4472.121.15109.42.411.88
17 ( ) and ( )B 60.0913.936.67946.039.371.37
18 ( ) and ( )B 75.0126.9916.954.4357.554.831.70
19 ( ) and ( )B 61.726.1360.471.0280.582.931.40
20 ( ) and ( )B 80.5842.9978.971.02126.661.481.83