Numerical Simulation for Thermal Shock Resistance of Thermal Protection Materials Considering Different Operating Environments

<table>Relationship between critical fracture temperature <svg height="11.6125" id="M25" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 22.3375 11.6125" width="22.3375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.55)"><path d="M600 0h-557v24l268 633l28 8l261 -641v-24zM497 50l-194 489l-196 -489h390z" id="x394"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,10.959,11.55)"><path d="M649 676l-22 -187l-33 -2q3 56 -12 94q-8 20 -31.5 26.5t-86.5 6.5h-74l-90 -491q-4 -23 -6 -36.5t1 -25t7 -16.5t18 -9t27 -5t41 -3l-6 -28h-286l4 28q68 5 84 18.5t28 76.5l94 491h-55q-74 0 -100.5 -6t-41.5 -23q-24 -29 -54 -98l-32 1q32 98 53 188h22q7 -18 15 -22
t37 -4h417q23 0 33.5 5t25.5 21h23z" id="x1D447"></path></g>
</svg> corresponding to different thermal shock initial temperature and cooling rate which Young’s modulus of constraint material is 200 GPa.</table>

The Scientific World Journal

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Numerical Simulation for Thermal Shock Resistance of Thermal Protection Materials Considering Different Operating Environments 