A Note on the Fractal Behavior of Hydraulic Conductivity and Effective Porosity for Experimental Values in a Confined Aquifer

<table>Trend of <svg height="12.4375" id="M105" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.6750002 12.4375" width="8.6750002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M480 416q0 -21 -18 -41q-9 -11 -17 -7q-20 9 -42 9q-62 0 -140 -78q23 -69 88 -192q17 -31 27 -42t20 -11q16 0 62 46l17 -20q-64 -92 -119 -92q-35 0 -70 66q-41 73 -84 187q-36 -30 -62 -61q-27 -115 -35 -172q-41 -8 -78 -20l-6 6l140 612q7 28 0.5 34t-37.5 7l-34 1
l5 26q38 4 74 13.5t57 17t25 7.5q12 0 4 -32l-104 -443h2q35 38 97 93q39 35 65.5 56t62 41.5t58.5 20.5q19 0 30.5 -10t11.5 -22z" id="x1D458"></path></g>
</svg> versus <svg height="17.362499" id="M106" style="vertical-align:-4.15506pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 33.700001 17.362499" width="33.700001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><path d="M559 271q0 -109 -83 -187t-189 -89l-36 -213q-16 -30 -86 -43l-7 9q10 36 53 242q-91 11 -139.5 63.5t-48.5 132.5q0 186 242 271l11 -28q-76 -34 -119.5 -91.5t-43.5 -136.5q0 -66 29 -108.5t77 -55.5q39 205 56 260q21 71 65 111t93 40q50 0 88 -45.5t38 -131.5z
M484 273q0 65 -26.5 99t-52.5 34q-37 0 -53 -75l-59 -298q80 5 135.5 74.5t55.5 165.5z" id="x1D711"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.95,17.162)"><path d="M391 364q0 -28 -20.5 -53.5t-50 -43.5t-70 -34t-73.5 -25t-68 -17v-29q0 -48 20 -81t65 -33q73 0 157 76l16 -23q-107 -113 -221 -113q-21 0 -40.5 6.5t-39 22t-31.5 47t-12 75.5q0 69 33.5 139.5t95.5 114.5q77 55 143 55q42 0 69 -24.5t27 -59.5zM313 350
q0 26 -14.5 40.5t-37.5 14.5q-32 0 -44 -7q-82 -46 -104 -175q200 49 200 127z" id="x1D452"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,15.5,12.138)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,21.382,12.138)"><path d="M352 391q0 -31 -27 -44q-14 -7 -24 6q-39 48 -84 48q-23 0 -39.5 -15t-16.5 -40q0 -43 73 -90q49 -32 70 -58t21 -57q0 -58 -62 -105.5t-129 -47.5q-40 0 -75.5 25t-35.5 52q0 28 32 46q7 4 15 3t11 -6q19 -31 48.5 -50.5t54.5 -19.5q34 0 54 19.5t20 42.5q0 43 -65 81
q-97 56 -97 123q0 50 51 96q19 17 58 32.5t62 15.5q37 0 61 -18t24 -39z" id="x1D460"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,27.756,12.138)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg> according to (<a href="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/tswj/volume-2013/356753/figures/#EEq4">4</a>): (a) decimal scale; (b) logarithmical scale.</table>

The Scientific World Journal

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: A Note on the Fractal Behavior of Hydraulic Conductivity and Effective Porosity for Experimental Values in a Confined Aquifer 