The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2013, Article ID 472956, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/472956

## Bounds of the Spectral Radius and the Nordhaus-Gaddum Type of the Graphs

School of Mathematics and Information Science, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614004, China

Received 28 February 2013; Accepted 14 May 2013

Academic Editors: H.-L. Liu and Y. Wang

Copyright © 2013 Tianfei Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The Laplacian spectra are the eigenvalues of Laplacian matrix , where and are the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and the adjacency matrix of a graph , respectively, and the spectral radius of a graph is the largest eigenvalue of . The spectra of the graph and corresponding eigenvalues are closely linked to the molecular stability and related chemical properties. In quantum chemistry, spectral radius of a graph is the maximum energy level of molecules. Therefore, good upper bounds for the spectral radius are conducive to evaluate the energy of molecules. In this paper, we first give several sharp upper bounds on the adjacency spectral radius in terms of some invariants of graphs, such as the vertex degree, the average 2-degree, and the number of the triangles. Then, we give some numerical examples which indicate that the results are better than the mentioned upper bounds in some sense. Finally, an upper bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type is obtained for the sum of Laplacian spectral radius of a connected graph and its complement. Moreover, some examples are applied to illustrate that our result is valuable.

#### 1. Introduction

The graphs in this paper are simple and undirected. Let be a simple graph with vertices and edges. For , denote by , , and the degree of , the average 2-degree of , and the set of neighbors of , respectively. Then is the 2-degree of . Let , , , and denote the maximum degree, second largest degree, minimum degree, and second smallest degree of vertices of , respectively. Obviously, we have and . A graph is -regular if .

The complement graph of is the graph with the same set of vertices as *G*, where two distinct vertices are adjacent if and only if they are independent in . The line graph of is defined by , where any two vertices in are adjacent if and only if they are adjacent as edges of *G*.

Let be a nonnegative square matrix. The spectral radius of is the maximum eigenvalue of . Denote by the adjacency matrix of , then is the spectral radius of . Let and denote the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and the adjacency matrix of *G*, respectively. Then the matrix is called the Laplacian matrix of a graph . Obviously, it is symmetric and positive semidefinite. Similarly, the quasi-Laplacian matrix is defined as , which is a nonnegative irreducible matrix. The largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix, denoted by , is called the Laplacian spectral radius. The Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph are important in graph theory, because they have close relations to many graph invariants, including connectivity, isoperimetric number, diameter, and maximum cut. Particularly, good upper bounds for are applied in many fields. For instance, it is used in theoretical chemistry, within the Heilbronner model, to determine the first ionization potential of alkanes, in combinatorial optimization to provide an upper bound on the size of the maximum cut in graph, in communication networks to provide a lower bound on the edge-forwarding index, and so forth. To learn more information on the applications of Laplacian spectral radius and other Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph, see references [1–4].

In the recent thirty years, the researchers obtained many good upper bounds for [5–8]. These upper bounds improved the previous results constantly. In this paper, we focus on the bounds for the spectral radius of a graph, and the bound of Nordhaus-Gaddum type is also considered, which is the sum of Laplacian spectral radius of a connected graph and its complement .

At the end of this section, we introduce some lemmas which will be used later on.

Lemma 1 (see [9]). *Let be an irreducible nonnegative matrix with spectral radius , and let be the th row sum of M; that is, . Then
*

*Moreover, if the row sums of are not all equal, then both inequalities are strict.*

Lemma 2 (see [10]). *Let be a connected graph with vertices; then
**The equality holds if and only if is a regular graph.*

This lemma gives a relation between the spectral radius of a graph and its line graph. Therefore, we can estimate the spectral radius of the adjacency matrix of graph by estimating that of its line graph.

Lemma 3 (see [11]). *Let be a real symmetric matrix, and let be the largest eigenvalue of . If is a polynomial on λ, then
*

*Here is the th row sum of matrix . Moreover, if the row sums of are not all equal, then both inequalities are strict.*

Lemma 4 (see [11]). *Let be a simple connected graph with vertices and let be the largest eigenvalue of the quasi-Laplacian matrix of graph . Then
**
with equality holds if and only if is a bipartite graph.*

By these lemmas, we will give some improved upper bounds for the spectral radius and determine the corresponding extremal graphs.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we will give several sharp upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius of graphs and determine the extremal graphs which achieve these bounds. In Section 3, some bounds of Nordhaus-Gaddum type will be given. Furthermore, in Sections 2 and 3, we present some examples to illustrate that our results are better than all of the mentioned upper bounds in this paper, in some sense.

#### 2. Bounds on the Spectral Radius

##### 2.1. Previous Results

The eigenvalues of adjacency matrix of the graph have wide applications in many fields. For instance, it can be used to present the energy level of specific electrons. Specially, the spectral radius of a graph is the maximum energy level of molecules. Hence, good upper bound for the spectral radius helps to estimate the energy level of molecules [12–15]. Recently, there are some classic upper bounds for the spectral radius of graphs.

In the early time Cao [16] gave a bound as follows:

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph or a star plus of , or a complete graph plus a regular graph with smaller degree of vertices.

Hu [17] obtained an upper bound with simple form as follows:

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph.

In 2005, Xu [18] proved that

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph or a star graph.

Using the average 2-degree of the vertices, the rese-archers got more upper bounds.

Cao’s [16] another upper bound:

The equality holds if and only if is a regular graph or a semiregular bipartite graph.

Similarly, Abrham and Zhang [19] proved that

The equality holds if and only if is a regular graph or a semiregular bipartite graph.

In recent years, Feng et al. [10] give some upper bounds for the spectral radius as follows:

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph.

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph.

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph.

The equality holds if and only if is regular graph.

##### 2.2. Main Results

All of these upper bounds mentioned in Section 2.1 are characterized by the degree and the average 2-degree of the vertices. Actually, we can also use other invariants of the graph to estimate the spectral radius. In the following, such an invariant will be introduced.

In a graph, a circle with length 3 is called a triangle. If is a triangle’s vertex in a graph, then is incident with this triangle. Denote by the number of the triangles associated with the vertex . For example, in Figure 1, we have = 3 and = = 0.

Let be the set of the common adjacent points of vertex and *v*; then present the cardinality of .

Now, some new and sharp upper and lower bounds for the spectral radius will be given.

Theorem 5. *Let be a simple connected graph with vertices. Then
**
the equality holds if and only if is a regular graph.*

*Proof. *Let is a diagonal matrix and is the adjacency matrix of the line graph. Denote , then and have the same eigenvalues. Since is a simple connected graph, it is easy to obtain that is nonnegative and irreducible matrix. The th entry of is equal to
here implies that and are adjacent in graph. Hence, the th row sum of is

From Lemmas 1 and 2, we have

It means that (14) holds and the equality in (14) holds if and only if is a regular graph.

In a graph, let and represent the number of vertices with the maximum degree and minimum degree, respectively. Then, we get the following results.

Theorem 6. *Let be a simple connected graph with vertices. If , then
**
the equality holds if and only if is a regular graph.*

*Proof. *Since is exactly the number of walks of length 2 in with a starting point , thus

Therefore, from Lemmas 1 and 3, if , we have for any . Then

Hence, it is easy to obtain that (18) holds.

If equality in (18) holds, then all equalities in the above argument must hold. Thus, for all

It means that and , or ; this shows that the graph is regular. Conversely, if is *k*-regular, it is not difficult to check that attains the upper bound by direct calculation.

Similarly for the lower bound, if , we have

It means that (19) holds and the equality in (19) holds if and only if is a regular graph by similar discussion.

Theorem 7. *Let be a simple connected graph with vertices. If ; then
**
the equality holds if and only if is a regular graph.*

*Proof. *According to the proof of Theorem 6, we have

Thus

From Lemma 3, we have

Solving this quadratic inequality, we obtain that upper bound (24) holds.

If equality in (24) holds, then all equalities in the argument must hold. By the similar discussion of Theorem 6, the equality holds if and only if is a regular graph.

##### 2.3. Numerical Examples

In this section, we will present two graphs to illustrate that our some new bounds are better than other bounds in some sense. Let Figures 2 and 3 be graphs of orders 7 and 8.

The estimated value of each upper bound is listed in Table 1. Obviously, from Table 1, bound (24) is the best in all known upper bounds for Figure 2 and bound (14) is the best for Figure 3. Furthermore, bound (18) is the best except (13) and (24) for Figure 2. Hence, commonly, these upper bounds are incomparable.

#### 3. Bounds of the Nordhaus-Gaddum Type

##### 3.1. Previous Results

In this part, we mainly discuss the upper bounds on the sum of Laplacian spectral radius of a connected graph and its complement , which is called the upper bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type. For convenience, let

The following are some classic upper bounds of Nordhaus-Gaddum type. The coarse bound easily implies the simplest upper bound on :

In particular, if both and are connected and irregular, Shi [20] gave a better upper bound as follows:

Liu et al. [21] proved that where .

Shi [20] gives another upper bound

To learn other bounds of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type, see references [22, 23]. In order to state the main result of this section, we first give an upper bound for the Laplacian spectral radius.

##### 3.2. Laplacian Spectral Radius

Here we give a new upper bound for the Laplacian spectral radius. For convenience, let

Theorem 8. *Let be a simple connected graph of order with and ; then
**
with equality holds if and only if is bipartite regular.*

*Proof. *Let ; then , it means that . Considering the th row sum of matrix , we have

This is equivalent to the following inequality:

From Lemma 3, we obtain that

By simple calculation, we get the upper bound of the spectral radius of matrix as follows:

Since , therefore from Lemma 4 we obtain that the result (34) holds.

If the spectral radius achieves the upper bound in (34), then each inequality in the above proof must be equal. This implies that for all , thus is regular graph. From Lemma 4 again, *G* is regular bipartite graph.

Conversely, it is easy to verify that equality in (34) holds for regular bipartite graphs.

##### 3.3. Bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum Type

In this part, based on Theorem 8, an upper bound of Nordhaus-Gaddum type of Laplacian matrix will be given.

Theorem 9. *Let be a simple graph of order with and ; then**here and . Moreover, if both and are connected, then the upper bound is strict.*

*Proof. *According to the relation of a graph and its complement, it is not difficult to obtain the invariants of . Denote it by , , and . From Theorem 8, we have

Let

Then the upper bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type of Laplacian matrix is

since

Obviously, holds if and only if the following inequality holds:

Let be a variable; then solving this inequality, we have

Here, the symbol represents the right hand of the above inequality. Then we can assert that is an increasing function for , and it implies that . Therefore, we have

Simplifying this expression by direct calculation, we prove that the result (39) is correct.

If equality in (39) holds, then each inequality in the above proof must be equality. From Theorem 8, we obtain that both and are regular bipartite. But it is impossible for a connected graph, this implies that the Laplacian spectral radius of either or fails to achieve its upper bound and so does the sum. Hence the inequality in (39) is strict.

##### 3.4. Numerical Examples

In this section, we give some examples to illustrate that the new bound is better than other bounds for some graphs. Considering the graph of order 10 in Figure 4 and Figures 1–3, the estimated value of each upper bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type is given in Table 2.

Clearly, from Table 2, we can see that new bound (39) is the best in all known upper bounds for all figures mentioned in this paper.

#### 4. Conclusion

From numerical examples of Sections 2 and 3, the estimated value of new upper bounds of the spectral radius and the Nordhaus-Gaddum type of graphs are the smallest in all known upper bounds for the graphs considered in these examples. It means that our results are better than the existing upper bounds in some sense.

#### Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (Grant no. 11ZA159, 11ZZ020, 12ZB238, and 13ZB0108).

#### References

- R. Merris, “Laplacian matrices of graphs: a survey,”
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*, vol. 197-198, pp. 143–176, 1994. View at Google Scholar - B. Mohar, “Some applications of Laplace eigenvalues of graphs,” in
*Graph Symmetry*, G. Harn and G. Sabiussi, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997. View at Google Scholar - I. Gutman, V. Gineityte, M. Lepović, and M. Petrović, “The high-energy band in the photoelectron spectrum of alkanes and its dependence on molecular structure,”
*Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society*, vol. 64, pp. 673–680, 1999. View at Google Scholar - B. Mohar and S. Poljak, “Eigenvalues and the max-cut problem,”
*Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal*, vol. 40, pp. 343–352, 1990. View at Google Scholar - T. F. Wang, “Several sharp upper bounds for the largest laplacian eigenvalue of a graph,”
*Science in China*, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1755–1764, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - X. D. Zhang, “Two sharp upper bounds for the Laplacian eigenvalues,”
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*, vol. 376, no. 1-3, pp. 207–213, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. Wang, J. Yang, and B. Li, “Improved upper bounds for the Laplacian spectral radius of a graph,”
*Electronic Journal of Combinatorics*, vol. 18, no. 1, article P35, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. F. Wang and B. Li, “New upper bounds for the laplacian spectral radius of graphs,”
*Journal of Sichuan Normal University*, vol. 33, pp. 487–490, 2010. View at Google Scholar - R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson,
*Matrix Analysis*, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1985. - L. Feng, Q. Li, and X. D. Zhang, “Some sharp upper bounds on the spectral radius of graphs,”
*Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 989–997, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - J. S. Li and Y. L. Pan, “Upper bounds for the laplacian graph eigenvalues,”
*Acta Mathematica Sinica*, vol. 20, pp. 803–806, 2004. View at Google Scholar - J. L. Shu, Y. Hong, and R. K. Wen, “A Sharp upper bound on the largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix of a graph,”
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*, vol. 347, pp. 123–129, 2002. View at Google Scholar - D. Cvetkovic, M. doob, and H. Sachs,
*Spectral of Graphs: Theory and Applications*, Academic Press, New Work, NY, USA, 1997. - D. M. Cvetkovic, M. Doob, I. Gutman, and A. Yorgasev,
*Recent Results in the Theory of Graph Spectra*, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988. - N. L. Biggs,
*Algebraic Graph Theory*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition, 1993. - D. S. Cao, “Bounds on eigenvalues and chromatic number,”
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*, vol. 270, pp. 1–13, 1998. View at Google Scholar - S. B. Hu, “Upper bound on spectral Radius of graphs,”
*Journal of Hebei University*, vol. 20, pp. 232–234, 2000. View at Google Scholar - H. J. Xu, “Upper bound on spectral radius of graphs,”
*Journal of Jiamusi University*, vol. 23, pp. 126–110, 2005. View at Google Scholar - B. Abrham and X. D. Zhang, “on the spectral radius of graphs with cut vertices,”
*Journal of Combinatorial Thcory*, vol. 83, pp. 233–240, 2001. View at Google Scholar - L. Shi, “Bounds on the (Laplacian) spectral radius of graphs,”
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*, vol. 422, no. 2-3, pp. 755–770, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. Liu, M. Lu, and F. Tian, “On the Laplacian spectral radius of a graph,”
*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*, vol. 376, no. 1–3, pp. 135–141, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Y. Hong and J. L. Shu, “A sharp upper bound for the spectral radius of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type,”
*Discrete Mathematics*, vol. 211, pp. 229–232, 2000. View at Google Scholar - S. He and J. L. Shu, “Ordering of trees with respect to their spectral radius of Nordhaus-Gaddum type,”
*Journal of Applied Mathematics*, vol. 22, pp. 247–252, 2007. View at Google Scholar