Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 515936, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/515936
Research Article

Ductility Enhancement of Post-Northridge Connections by Multilongitudinal Voids in the Beam Web

1Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Aydin University, Florya Main Campus, İnönü Street, Sefaköy-Küçükçekmece, 34295 Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Civil Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, P.O. Box 95, Gazimagusa, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey
3Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Joopar Road, Kerman 7635131167, Iran

Received 6 August 2013; Accepted 10 September 2013

Academic Editors: E. Choi and H.-T. Hu

Copyright © 2013 Sepanta Naimi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. A. Mahin, “Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake,” Engineering Structures, vol. 20, no. 4–6, pp. 261–270, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. K. Miller, “Lessons learned from the Northridge earthquake,” Engineering Structures, vol. 20, no. 4–6, pp. 249–260, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. H. Lee, B. Stojadinovic, S. C. Goel et al., Parametric Tests on Unreinforced Connections, Volume I—Final Report, SAC/BD-00/01, 2002.
  4. M. D. Engelhardt and T. A. Sabol, “Reinforcing of steel moment connections with cover plates: benefits and limitations,” Engineering Structures, vol. 20, no. 4–6, pp. 510–520, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Kim, A. S. Whittaker, A. S. J. Gilani, V. V. Bertero, and S. M. Takhirov, “Cover-plate & flange-plate reinforced steel moment-resisting connection,” Repot No. SAC/BD-0027, SAC Joint Venture, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Chi, C. Uang, and A. Chen, “Seismic rehabilitation of pre-Northridge steel moment connections: a case study,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 783–792, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. SAC, “Experimental investigations of beam-column sub assemblages,” Tech. Rep. SAC-96-01, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. P. Popov and K. C. Tsai, “Performance of large seismic steel moment connections under cyclic loads,” Engineering Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. C. Chen, J. M. Lee, and M. C. Lin, “Behaviour of steel moment connections with a single flange rib,” Engineering Structures, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1419–1428, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. D. Engelhardt and T. A. Sabol, Testing of Welded Steel Moment Connections in Response of the Northridge Earthquake, Northridge Steel Update 1, American Institute of Steel Construction, 1994.
  11. C. C. Chen, C. C. Lin, and C. L. Tsai, “Evaluation of reinforced connections between steel beams and box columns,” Engineering Structures, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 1889–1904, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Kasai, I. Hodgon, and C. Mao, “Bolted repair methods for fractured welded moment connections,” in Proceedings of the Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (Stessa '97), pp. 939–946, Kyoto, Japan, 1997.
  13. E. P. Popov, T. S. Yang, and S. P. Chang, “Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake,” Engineering Structures, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1030–1038, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Wilkinson, G. Hurdman, and A. Crowther, “A moment resisting connection for earthquake resistant structures,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 295–302, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Hedayat and M. Celikag, “Wedge uesign: a reduced beam web (RBW) connection for seismic regions,” Advances in Structural Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 263–290, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. A. Ascheheim, “Moment-resistant structure, sustainer and method of resisting episodic loads,” United State Patent No. 6,012,256, 2000.
  17. A. A. Hedayat and M. Celikag, “Reduced beam web (RBW) connections with circular openings,” in Structural Steel: Shapes and Standards, Properties and Applications, Nova Science, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. A. Hedayat and M. Celikag, “Post-Northridge connection with modified beam end configuration to enhance strength and ductility,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1413–1430, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. A. Hedayat, H. Saffari, and A. Eghbali, “Behaviour of steel reduced beam web (RBW) connections with drilled voids,” in 5th SASTech 2011, Khavaran Higher-Education Institute, Mashhad, Iran, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  20. A. A. Hedayat, H. Saffari, and M. Mousavi, “Behavior of steel reduced beam web connections with arch-shape cut,” Advances in Structural Engineering. In press.
  21. H. Saffari, A. A. Hedayat, and M. P. Nejad, “Post-Northridge connections with slit dampers to enhance strength and ductility,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 80, pp. 138–152, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. ANSYS User Manual, ANSYS, Inc., 2007.
  23. C. S. Gilton and C. M. Uang, “Cyclic response and design recommendations of weak-axis reduced beam section moment connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 452–463, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Mao, J. Ricles, L. Lu, and J. Fisher, “Effect of local details on ductility of welded moment connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 127, no. 9, pp. 1036–1044, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. M. Ricles, C. Mao, L. Lu, and J. W. Fisher, “Ductile details for welded unreinforced moment connections subject to inelastic cyclic loading,” Engineering Structures, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 667–680, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. “Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings,” Report No. FEMA350, 2000.
  27. ANSI/AISC 360-10, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010.
  28. Manual of Steel Construction: Load and Resistance Factor Design, vol. 1-2, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2nd edition, 1995.
  29. “Specification for structural steel beams with web openings,” ASCE standard, SEI/ASCE23-97.
  30. AISC/ANSI341, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, AISC/ANSI341-10, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2010.
  31. “Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings,” Report No. FEMA350, 2000.
  32. M. D. Engelhard, C. M. Uang, J. L. Gross, K. Kasai, and N. Iwankiw, Modification of Existing Welded Steel Moment Frame Connections for Seismic Resistance, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2003.
  33. J. M. Ricles, C. Mao, L. Lu, and J. W. Fisher, “Ductile details for welded unreinforced moment connections subject to inelastic cyclic loading,” Engineering Structures, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 667–680, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. El-Tawil, T. Mikesell, E. Vidarsson, and S. K. Kunnath, “Strength and ductility of FR welded-bolted connections,” Report No. SAC/BD-98/01, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar