Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 516742, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/516742
Research Article

Stakeholders’ Attitude to Genetically Modified Foods and Medicine

1Centre for General Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
2Institute of Malay World and Civilization, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
3Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Received 17 September 2013; Accepted 23 October 2013

Academic Editors: C. C. Chase, Jr and D. M. Prazeres

Copyright © 2013 Latifah Amin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Walsh, “Biopharmacetiucal approval trends in 2009,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 28, pp. 917–992, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. James, “Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2010,” ISAAA Brief no. 42, ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Walsh, “Second-generation biopharmaceuticals,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 185–196, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. The Economic Planning, Unit Prime Minister's Department, “Putrajaya: ninth Malaysia plan,” 2006, http://www.parlimen.gov.my/news/eng-ucapan_rmk9.pdf.
  5. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), “The national biotechnology policy,” 2005, http://www.mosti.gov.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2029&Itemid=609&lang=en.
  6. Z. A. Zainol, L. Amin, N. S. Rusly et al., “The need for biosafety regulation in developing countries: benefits and controversies,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 58, pp. 12389–12394, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Connor and M. Siegrist, “Factors influencing people's acceptance of gene technology: the role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust,” Science Communication, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 514–538, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. K. Hallman, W. C. Hebden, H. L. Aquino, C. L. Cuite, and J. T. Lang, “Public perceptions of genetically modified foods: a national study of american knowledge and opinion,” Tech. Rep., Food Policy Institute, Cook College, Rutgers University and The State University of New Jersey, New Brunsqick, NJ, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Gaskell, S. Stares, A. Allansdottir, C. Corchero, and J. Jackson, “Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends,” Final Report on Eurobarometer 64. 3, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Costa-Font, J. M. Gil, and W. B. Traill, “Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy,” Food Policy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 99–111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Gaskell, S. Stares, A. Allansdottir et al., “Europeans and biotechnology in 2010: winds of change?” A Report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  12. I. B. Christoph, M. Bruhn, and J. Roosen, “Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany,” Appetite, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), “The social and cultural dimensions of agricultural biotechnology in Southeast Asia: public understanding, perceptions, and attitudes towards biotechnology in Malaysia,” 2003, http://www.isaaa.org/kc/Publications/pdfs/surveys/Malaysia%20PPS.pdf.
  14. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), “The social and cultural dimensions of agricultural biotechnology in Southeast Asia: public understanding, perceptions, and attitudes towards biotechnology in Thailand,” 2003, http://www.isaaa.org/kc/Publications/pdfs/surveys/Thailand%20PPS.pdf.
  15. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), “The social and cultural dimensions of agricultural biotechnology in Southeast Asia: public understanding, perceptions, and attitudes towards biotechnology in Indonesia,” 2003, http://www.isaaa.org/kc/Publications/pdfs/surveys/Indonesia%20PPS.pdf.
  16. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) and University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC), “The social and cultural dimensions of agricultural biotechnology in Southeast Asia: public understanding, perceptions, and attitudes towards biotechnology in the Philippines,” 2003, http://www.isaaa.org/kc/Publications/pdfs/surveys/Philippines%20PPS.pdf.
  17. M. G. Nanere, E. Yiridoe, S. Russel, C. D'Souza, and A. Quazi, “A comparative study of consumer perceptions of genetically modified foods in Australia and Indonesia,” AFBE Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Krualee and O. Napasintuwong, “Factors determining GM soybean milk acceptance among Bangkok consumers,” in Proceeding of the International Conference on Business and Economic Research (ICBER '10), pp. 15–16, Sarawak, Malaysia, March 2010.
  19. X. Zhang, J. Huang, H. Qiu, and Z. Huang, “A consumer segmentation study with regards to genetically modified food in urban China,” Food Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 456–462, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. B. Kim, “Consumer attitude of risk and benefit toward genetically modified (GM) foods in South Korea: implication for food policy,” Engineering Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. V. V. Krishna and M. Qaim, “Consumer attitudes toward GM food and pesticide residues in India,” Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 233–251, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Siipi and V. Launis, “Opposition and acceptance of GM-food and GM-medicine,” The Open Ethics Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 97–103, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Costa-Font and J. M. Gil, “Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: a cross country study,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 399–409, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. P. Bloomfield and B. Doolin, “Imagination and technoscientific innovations: governance of transgenic cows in New Zealand,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 59–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Sagar, A. Daemmrich, and M. Ashiya, “The tragedy of the commoners: biotechnology and its publics,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2–4, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Connor and M. Siegrist, “Sorting biotechnology applications: results of multi-dimensional scaling (MSD) and cluster analysis,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Kamaldeen and D. A. Powell, “Public perceptions of biotechnology,” Food Safety Network Technical Report no. 17, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  28. P. Aerni, “Public acceptance of genetically engineered food in developing countries: the case of transgenic rice in the Philippines,” AgBiotechNet, no. ABN 031, 1999.
  29. J. Kelley, “Public perceptions of genetic engineering: Australia, 1994,” Final Report to the Department of Industry, Science and Technology, 1995, http://www.international-survey.org/Kelley_1995_Pub_Percept_Genetic_Engineering2.pdf.
  30. L. Frewer, J. Lassen, B. Kettlitz, J. Scholderer, V. Beekman, and K. G. Berdal, “Societal aspects of genetically modified foods,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1181–1193, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. F. Rollin, J. Kennedy, and J. Wills, “Consumers and new food technologies,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 2–3, pp. 99–111, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. F. Einsiedel, “Biotechnology and the canadian public: report on a 1997 national survey and some international comparisons,” Tech. Rep., University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Knight, “Intervening effects of knowledge, morality, trust, and benefits on support for animal and plant biotechnology applications,” Risk Analysis, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1553–1563, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Gaskell, N. Allum, M. Bauer et al., “Biotechnology and the european public,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 935–938, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Gaskel, N. Allum, and S. Stares, “Europeans and biotechnology in 2002,” A Report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the Project “Life Sciences in European Society“ QLG7-CT-1999-00286, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  36. G. Rowe, “How can genetically modified foods be made publicly acceptable?” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 107–109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Hansen, L. Holm, L. Frewer, P. Robinson, and P. Sandøe, “Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks,” Appetite, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Rohrmann, “Risk perception research: review and documentation,” RC Studies no. 68, Jülich Research Centre, Düren, Germany, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  39. L. Sjöberg, “Principles of risk perception applied to gene technology,” EMBO Reports, vol. 5, pp. S47–S51, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. C. McGrew Jr. and C. B. Monroe, Statistical Problem Solving in Geography, William C. Brown, Oxford, UK, 1993.
  41. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis, Academic Press, London, UK, 1969.
  42. R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 30, pp. 607–610, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  43. P. Sturgis, I. Brunton-Smith, and C. Fife-Schaw, “Public attitudes to genomic science: an experiment in information provision,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 166–180, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. Amin, J. Md. Jahi, A. R. Md. Nor, M. Osman, and N. M. Mahadi, “The development of an instrument for public attitude towards modern biotechnology in Malaysia,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Bangi World Conference on Environmental Management 2004, pp. 630–635.
  45. INRA(Europe)—ECOSA, “Eurobarometer 52.1. The europeans and biotechnology,” Report for the European Comission’s Directorate-General For Research, “Life ScienceS Directorate”, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  46. S. F. L. Kirk, D. Greenwood, J. E. Cade, and A. D. Pearman, “Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom,” Appetite, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 189–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. F. Hair Jr., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis—A Global Perspective, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010.
  48. B. Thompson, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  49. R. B. Kline, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, Methodology in the Social Sciences, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2005.
  50. E. Carmines and J. McIver, “Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures,” in Social Measurement: Current Issues, G. W. Bohrnstedt and E. F. Borgatta, Eds., pp. 65–115, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  51. C. Fornel and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural model with unobserved variables and measurement errors,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  52. L. Amin, J. Ahmad, J. Md. Jahi, A. R. Md. Nor, M. Osman, and N. M. Mahadi, “Factors influencing malaysian public attitudes to agro-biotechnology,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 674–689, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. S. Torres, M. M. Suva, L. B. Carpio, and W. B. Dagli, “Public understanding and perception of and attitude towards agricultural biotechnology in the Philippines,” Tech. Rep., College of Development Communication, University of the Philippines Los Baños, SEAMEO Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), and the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), 2006. View at Google Scholar
  54. H. Sheehy, M. Legault, and D. Ireland, “Consumers and biotechnology: a synopsis of survey and focus group research,” Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 359–386, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. Wansink and J. Kim, “The marketing battle over genetically modified foods: false assumptions about consumer behavior,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1405–1417, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. Amin, J. Ahmad, J. Md. Jahi, A. R. Md. Nor, M. Osman, and N. M. Mahadi, “Malaysians and modern biotechnology: factors influencing its encouragement,” The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic & Social Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  57. S. H. Priest, “US public opinion divided over biotechnology,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 939–942, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. Nelkin, Selling Science, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY, USA, 1996.