Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 587284, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/587284
Research Article

Updating Categorical Soil Maps Using Limited Survey Data by Bayesian Markov Chain Cosimulation

1Department of Geography and Center for Environmental Sciences & Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
2Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
3Center for Environmental Sciences & Engineering and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA

Received 19 April 2013; Accepted 19 July 2013

Academic Editors: J. C. Domec and J. J. Wang

Copyright © 2013 Weidong Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Campling, A. Gobin, and J. Feyen, “Logistic modeling to spatially predict the probability of soil drainage classes,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1390–1401, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Bailey, T. Clements, J. T. Lee, and S. Thompson, “Modelling soil series data to facilitate targeted habitat restoration: a polytomous logistic regression approach,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 395–407, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Hengl, N. Toomanian, H. I. Reuter, and M. J. Malakouti, “Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profile observations: lessons from Iran,” Geoderma, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 417–427, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Debella-Gilo and B. Etzelmüller, “Spatial prediction of soil classes using digital terrain analysis and multinomial logistic regression modeling integrated in GIS: examples from Vestfold County, Norway,” Catena, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 8–18, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. J. Moran and E. N. Bui, “Spatial data mining for enhanced soil map modelling,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 533–549, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Scull, J. Franklin, and O. A. Chadwick, “The application of classification tree analysis to soil type prediction in a desert landscape,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. O. A. Odeh, A. B. McBratney, and D. J. Chittleborough, “Soil pattern recognition with fuzzy-c-means: application to classification and soil-landform interrelationships,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 505–516, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. A. Burrough, R. A. Macmillan, and W. Van Deursen, “Fuzzy classification methods for determining land suitability from soil profile observations and topography,” Journal of Soil Science, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 193–210, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. A. MacMillan, D. E. Moon, and R. A. Coupé, “Automated predictive ecological mapping in a Forest Region of B.C., Canada, 2001–2005,” Geoderma, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 353–373, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. F. P. Bierkens and P. A. Burrough, “The indicator approach to categorical soil data. II. Application to mapping and land use suitability analysis,” Journal of Soil Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 369–381, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. J. Brus, P. Bogaert, and G. B. M. Heuvelink, “Bayesian Maximum Entropy prediction of soil categories using a traditional soil map as soft information,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 166–177, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Zhang and W. Li, “Regional-scale modelling of the spatial distribution of surface and subsurface textural classes in alluvial soils using Markov chain geostatistics,” Soil Use and Management, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 263–272, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Goovaerts, “Stochastic simulation of categorical variables using a classification algorithm and simulated annealing,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 909–921, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. De Oliveira, “Bayesian prediction of clipped Gaussian random fields,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 299–314, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Connolly, N. M. Holden, and S. M. Ward, “Mapping peatlands in Ireland using a rule-based methodology and digital data,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 492–499, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. J. Nield, J. L. Boettinger, and R. D. Ramsey, “Digitally mapping gypsic and natric soil areas using landsat ETM data,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 245–252, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. Li, “Markov chain random fields for estimation of categorical variables,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 321–335, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Li, “Transiograms for characterizing spatial variability of soil classes,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 881–893, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Abend, T. J. Harley, and L. N. Kanal, “Classification of binary random patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 538–544, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Li and C. Zhang, “A random-path markov chain algorithm for simulating categorical soil variables from random point samples,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 656–668, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. D. Hudson, “The soil survey as paradigm-based science,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 836–841, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Kerry, P. Goovaerts, B. G. Rawlins, and B. P. Marchant, “Disaggregation of legacy soil data using area to point kriging for mapping soil organic carbon at the regional scale,” Geoderma, vol. 170, pp. 347–358, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. J. Gray, J. W. Kay, and D. M. Titterington, “Empirical study of the simulation of various models used for images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 507–513, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. Li and C. Zhang, “A single-chain-based multidimensional Markov chain model for subsurface characterization,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 157–174, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. Li and C. Zhang, “Some further clarification on Markov chain random fields and transiograms,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 423–430, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Besag, “On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures (with discussions),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 48, pp. 259–302, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. K. Pickard, “Unilateral Markov fields,” Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 655–671, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Haslett, “Maximum likelihood discriminant analysis on the plane using a Markovian model of spatial context,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 287–296, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Rosholm, Statistical methods for segmentation and classification of images [Ph.D. thesis], Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1997.
  30. W. Li and C. Zhang, “A generalized Markov chain approach for conditional simulation of categorical variables from grid samples,” Transactions in GIS, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 651–669, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Schwarzacher, “The use of Markov chains in the study of sedimentary cycles,” Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–39, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Lou, “Transition probability approach to statistical analysis of spatial qualitative variables in geology,” in Geologic Modeling and Mapping, A. Forster and D. F. Merriam, Eds., pp. 281–299, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  33. G. E. Fogg, “Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 453–477, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. F. Carle and G. E. Fogg, “Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 891–918, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. W. Ritzi, “Behavior of indicator variograms and transition probabilities in relation to the variance in lengths of hydrofacies,” Water Resources Research, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 3375–3381, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. Li and C. Zhang, “Linear interpolation and joint model fitting of experimental transiograms for Markov chain simulation of categorical spatial variables,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 821–839, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey-Iowa County, Wisconsin, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1962.
  38. A. Soares, “Geostatistical estimation of multi-phase structures,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus