Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013, Article ID 607102, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/607102
Research Article

The Elicitation Effect of Pathogenic Fungi on Trichodermin Production by Trichoderma brevicompactum

1Institute of Insect Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
2College of Life Science, China Jiliang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Biometrology and Inspection & Quarantine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China

Received 31 October 2013; Accepted 19 November 2013

Academic Editors: A. Bekatorou, A. Geng, and C. R. C. Calado

Copyright © 2013 Xu-Ping Shentu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The effects of six species of phytopathogenic fungi mycelia as elicitors on trichodermin yield by Trichoderma brevicompactum were investigated. Neither nonviable nor viable mycelia of Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria solani, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, and Thanatephorus cucumeris demonstrated any elicitation on the accumulation of trichodermin. However, the production of trichodermin was increased by the presence of viable/nonviable Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum mycelia. The strongest elicitation effect was found at the presence of nonviable R. solani. At the presence of nonviable R. solani, the maximum yield of trichodermin (144.55 mg/L) was significantly higher than the Control (67.8 mg/L), and the cultivation time to obtain the maximum yield of trichodermin decreased from 72 h to 60 h. No difference of trichodermin accumulation was observed by changing the concentration of nonviable R. solani from 0.1 to 1.6 g/L. It was observed that the optimum time for adding nonviable R. solani is immediately after inoculation. The diameter of T. brevicompactum mycelial globule after 72 h cultivation with nonviable R. solani elicitor was smaller than that of the Control.

1. Introduction

Trichothecenes are a large group of sesquiterpenoid-derived secondary metabolites and have mainly been isolated from species of Fusarium and other fungal genera like Stachybotrys, Myrothecium, Trichoderma, and Trichothecium [1, 2]. To date, more than 200 trichothecenes have been reported and are divided into four types (A–D) according to their chemical structures [36]. Trichodermin biosynthesized by Trichoderma belongs to type A [7]. Trichodermin had stronger antifungal activity against Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and Aspergillus fumigatus as compared to amphotericin B and hygromycin [1]. Furthermore, trichodermin had a potential biological control activity on the phytopathogenic fungi such as Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani [8, 9]. It is also a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis in mammalian cells [10].

Recent researches on trichodermin mainly focused on the biosynthetic pathway in Trichoderma and its antifungal activities [1, 913]. At present, the related report about improvement on trichodermin yield is very scarce and fermentation units were only up to 325 μg/L [14]. To enable large-scale production, it is important to investigate the influence of different factors on yield and optimize the fermentation conditions so as to improve the yield of trichodermin. In general, the methods for enhancing the yield of secondary metabolites biosynthesized by microorganisms are based on strain improvement, the adjustment of bioreactor conditions, and precursor/elicitor input. In recent years, the production of pharmaceutically important secondary metabolites has been effectively increased by the addition of fungal elicitors, such as mycelia, carbohydrate fragments, proteins, oligosaccharides, or secretions derived from fungi in certain plant cell cultures [1517]. However, the improvement on trichodermin yield in Trichoderma using precursor/elicitor has not been reported.

In the present work, the elicitation effects of six viable and nonviable phytopathogenic fungi species on trichodermin production by T. brevicompactum were studied. The concentration and time for adding fungal elicitor were optimized. The morphological characteristics of T. brevicompactum mycelia with/without elicitors were also compared.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains

Fungal strains, T. brevicompactum, R. solani, Fusarium oxysporum, B. cinerea, Alternaria solani, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, and Thanatephorus cucumeris, were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants at 4°C for further tests. The biological agent, T. brevicompactum, was isolated from plant garlic (Allium sativum). The above phytopathogens were kindly provided by the Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

2.2. Preparation of T. brevicompactum Spores

T. brevicompactum was cultured on PDA medium in the 9 cm diameter Petri dishes at 28°C. After 1 week, 5 mL of sterile water was added to the Petri plate culture. The spores were gently dislodged from the surface with a sterile glass rod and the suspension was filtered through filter paper to remove mycelia fragments. Subsequently, the suspension was diluted with sterile water and adjusted to the concentration about 1.0 × 106 conidia/mL by a thrombocytometer [18].

2.3. Trichodermin Analysis by Gas Chromatographic (GC)

The trichodermin was quantified by GC (Agilent 6890N) with an HP-5 capillary column (5% phenyl methyl siloxane, 30 m × 320 μm × 0.25 μm), an FID detector, and nitrogen as the carrier gas. The injector and the detector temperatures were 250°C and 270°C, respectively, and the column temperature was raised by program with an initial temperature of 100°C maintaining for 5 min and an increase at a rate of 10°C/min up to 260°C maintaining for 5 min. The flow rate of N2 was 1.5 mL/min [19].

2.4. Effect of Viable Mycelia on Trichodermin Yield

Spores (1 mL) and one-round plug with 4 mm diameter excised from the growing edge of a 4-day-old phytopathogenic fungal colony were coinoculated into the same 300 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 60 mL sterilized medium. The medium consisted of 8 g/L dextrose, 10 g/L beef extract, and 2 g/L sodium chloride. After different incubation times on a rotary shaker at 180 rpm under °C, the fermentation broth was separated from the mycelia by filtration using a Buchner funnel. The filtered broths were extracted exhaustively with ethyl acetate (v/v, 1 : 2). The organic fractions were combined and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum at 50°C. The recovered residues were resuspended in methanol and subjected to GC analysis for the quantification of trichodermin. The culture of T. brevicompactum without adding fungal pathogens was served as the Control.

2.5. Effect of Nonviable Mycelia on Trichodermin Yield

The mycelia of phytopathogenic fungus were picked from slants and inoculated into 300 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 60 mL PD medium. After 5 days of cultivation on a rotary shaker at 180 rpm under °C, the mycelia were separated by filtration using a Buchner funnel. Then the mycelia were drained and freeze-dried at −54°C and under 0.5 mbar vacuum for 12 h. The dehydrated mycelia were grounded in a mortar to obtain the fine powder. It was proved that the powder obtained by the above procedure was unable to grow when inoculated in minimal or rich medium. The culture of T. brevicompactum without mycelia powder was used as the Control.

2.6. Effects of the Concentration and Time for Adding Nonviable R. solani on Trichodermin Production

The influence of nonviable R. solani concentration ranging from 0.1 to 1.6 g/L on trichodermin accumulation was studied. Zero h and 12 h after inoculation were designed to test the effects of the time for adding nonviable R. solani on trichodermin yield. After cultivation, the mycelia of T. brevicompactum were separated by filtration using a Buchner funnel. Then the mycelia were dried at 90°C until reaching a constant weight. The dry mycelia were weighted using a digital balance (HA1001, Shanghai Electronic Balance Co., Shanghai, China).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The whole statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 software. Trichodermin concentration comparisons between different treatments were made using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by LSD multiple comparison test. values <0.05 were considered as significant.

3. Results

3.1. Influence of Phytopathogenic Fungi on Trichodermin Production

The effects of six species of phytopathogenic fungi mycelia as elicitors on trichodermin yield were tested. Neither nonviable nor viable mycelia of B. cinerea, C. lindemuthianum, T. cucumeris, or A. solani caused significant differences in the accumulation of trichodermin as compared with the Control (Figure 1). The production of trichodermin by T. brevicompactum in liquid cultures was differently affected by the presence of viable/nonviable R. solani or F. oxysporum mycelia. No significant differences of trichodermin yields were observed with viable R. solani and F. oxysporum as elicitors, but a significantly higher concentration of trichodermin was produced with viable R. solani and F. oxysporum compared with Controls at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h, respectively. Similarly, a distinctly higher concentration of trichodermin occurred at the presence of nonviable R. solani or F. oxysporum mycelia as compared to the Control. In particular, the production of trichodermin in liquid cultures at the presence of nonviable R. solani was two times higher than the Control at 72 h. However, the elicitation effect of nonviable F. oxysporum on trichodermin accumulation was not as obvious as that of R. solani.

fig1
Figure 1: Trichodermin production by T. brevicompactum at the presence of pathogenic fungi. (a) R. solani, (b) B. cinerea, (c) T. cucumeris, (d) F. oxysporum, (e) A. solani, (f) C. lindemuthianum.
3.2. Influence of the Concentration of Nonviable R. solani Mycelia on Trichodermin Production

The influence of nonviable R. solani mycelia with different concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.6 g/L on trichodermin accumulation was studied. The results showed that there was no distinct difference among the yields of trichodermin by adding different concentrations of non-viable R. solani mycelia with the same cultivation times (Figure 2). That is to say, within the concentration range investigated, nonviable R. solani had a positive effect on trichodermin yield in spite of its concentration. Moreover, more biomass was obtained under the elicitation of R. solani elicitor (Figure 3).

607102.fig.002
Figure 2: Influence of the concentration for nonviable R. solani (g/L) on trichodermin production.
607102.fig.003
Figure 3: Influence of the concentration for nonviable R. solani (g/L) on T. brevicompactum growth.
3.3. Effect of the Time for Adding Nonviable R. solani Mycelia on Cultivation Process

The nonviable R. solani mycelia as an elicitor significantly influenced the production of trichodermin biosynthesized by T. brevicompactum as compared with the Control (Figure 4). When the elicitor was added at the same time as inoculation, trichodermin was detected in fermentation broth after 12 h using the established GC method; however, for the Control, trichodermin was not found until 24 h. The results indicate that trichodermin biosynthesis was advanced by T. brevicompactum. After adding non-viable R. solani mycelia, T. brevicompactum yielded a significantly higher trichodermin production (144.55 mg/L) as compared to the Control (67.8 mg/L), and the cultivation time to obtain the maximum yield decreased from 72 h to 60 h. Adding R. solani not only improved the yield of trichodermin but also shortened the culture period. When elicitors were added 12 h after inoculation, the final yield of trichodermin was also enhanced but trichodermin biosynthesis was not advanced compared to Control.

607102.fig.004
Figure 4: Influence of the time for adding nonviable R. solani mycelia (0.1 g/L) on trichodermin biosynthesis.
3.4. Morphological Change of T. brevicompactum at the Presence of Nonviable R. solani

After 72 h cultivation, the mycelia were obtained from the fermentation broth by filtration using a Buchner funnel. Mycelial globules were observed in the presence of nonviable R. solani or the Control. The dry weights of mycelia for the nonviable R. solani group and the Control were significantly different. Furthermore, the diameter of mycelial globule for nonviable R. solani group was smaller than that of the Control.

4. Discussion

It is well known that the main bottleneck of secondary metabolites production is the low production in fermentation [20]. So, many research efforts have been focused on improving the yield of the active secondary metabolites. However, the usage of different elicitors has not been comprehensively explored in trichodermin production.

Encouraging results were obtained that the mycelia of R. solani and F. oxysporum as elicitors can significantly promote the trichodermin production in our experiments. On the contrary, the mycelia from other tested fungi, B. cinerea, C. lindemuthianum, T. cucumeris or, A. solani, did not show elicitation effect on trichodermin yield. Our research results were similar to previous researches [21], where the yields of antifungal compounds T39 butenolide and harzianopyridone produced by commercial strain T. harzianum T39 were improved in cocultures with B. cinerea or R. solani. Similarly, nonviable R. solani was found to be able to increase the accumulation of 6-pentyl-a-pyrone (6PP) by T. harzianum [22]. In this work, it was demonstrated that adding mycelia of pathogenic fungi into the cultivation of Trichoderma could improve the production of active secondary metabolites. The genus Trichoderma is widely used as a biocontrol agent for inhibiting fungal phytopathogens growth by three mechanisms: competition, parasitism, and antibiosis [23, 24]. Previous studies suggested that mycoparasitic behaviour is induced by the responses triggered by molecules released from the host or located on its surface [25, 26]. Furthermore, the studies underlying signal transduction pathways found that a loss of mycoparasitic abilities in Trichoderma mutant was reflected strongly by the decreased chitinase activities and reduced production of active metabolites (e.g., 6pp) [2628]. These research results implied that mycoparasitic behaviour of Trichoderma against phytopathogenic fungi, induced by molecules from their hosts, can promote active compounds production by Trichoderma. Therefore, the results in this work suggest that induced molecules from R. solani/F. oxysporum can induce mycoparasitic behaviour and further stimulate trichodermin biosynthesis by T. brevicompactum. Certainly, the correlation among induced molecules, mycoparasitism, and metabolites biosynthesis by Trichoderma needs to be further studied in order to clarify the elicitation mechanism.

However, nonviable R. solani and F. oxysporum mycelia as elicitors had a strong effect on trichodermin production than viable R. solani and F. oxysporum mycelia. Our other researches (unpublished data) indicated that R. solani and F. oxysporum could inhibit T. brevicompactum growth. So, it is understandable that the inhibition on T. brevicompactum by viable R. solani or F. oxysporum decreased the elicitation effect in cultivation.

In our study, mycelia morphology of T. brevicompactum was also investigated. The mycelial globule of T. brevicompactum with elicitor was smaller in diameter than that of the Control. The potential advantage of a smaller mycelial globule is that it can facilitate nutrition absorption and metabolites secretion during cultivation.

The results indicate that nonviable R. solani is an effective and convenient elicitor in trichodermin production by T. brevicompactum. The direct application of phytopathogenic fungi as elicitors may represent a novel approach to improve bioactive compounds yield by Trichoderma. Certainly, more researches such as the structure of induced molecules in R. solani and the molecular evidence of elicitation are necessary to better understand and use this novel approach in antifungal compounds production.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by State Basic Research Development Program (2011CB111602), National Natural Science Fund of China (31171860), Zhejiang Province Natural Science Fund (LY12C14012), and Zhejiang Province Programs for Science and Technology Development (2013C32008, 2010C32063, and 2011R09027).

References

  1. A. Tijerino, R. E. Cardoza, J. Moraga et al., “Overexpression of the trichodiene synthase gene tri5 increases trichodermin production and antimicrobial activity in Trichoderma brevicompactum,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. P. Tate and C. T. Caskey, “Peptidyltransferase inhibition by trichodermin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 248, no. 22, pp. 7970–7972, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. F. Grove, “The trichothecenes and their biosynthesis,” Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe, vol. 88, pp. 63–130, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Kimura, T. Tokai, N. Takahashi-Ando, S. Ohsato, and M. Fujimura, “Molecular and genetic studies of Fusarium trichothecene biosynthesis: pathways, genes, and evolution,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 2105–2123, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Ueno, “Toxicological features of T-2 toxin and related trichothecenes,” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, vol. 4, no. 2, part 2, pp. S124–S132, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Ueno, “The toxicology of mycotoxins,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 14, pp. 99–132, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  7. G. F. Kraus, I. Druzhinina, W. Gams et al., “Trichoderma brevicompactum sp. nov,” Mycologia, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1059–1073, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. X. P. Shentu, Y. J. Shi, and X. P. Yu, “Identification of an endophytic isolate from Ilex cornuta and its antagonism against Rhizoctonia solani,” Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, vol. 12, pp. 173–177, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. L. Yin, W. M. Wang, S. Sha, L. Liu, and X. P. Yu, “Inhibition and control effects of the ethyl acetate extract of Trichoderma harzianum fermented broth against Botrytis cinerea,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 1647–1653, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Carrasco, M. Barbacid, and D. Vazquez, “The trichodermin group of antibiotics, inhibitors of peptide bond formation by eukaryotic ribosomes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 368–376, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Cardoza, M. G. Malmierca, M. R. Hermosa et al., “Identification of loci and functional characterization of trichothecene biosynthesis genes in filamentous fungi of the genus Trichoderma,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 14, pp. 4867–4877, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Tijerino, R. Hermosa, R. E. Cardoza et al., “Overexpression of the Trichoderma brevicompactum tri5 gene: effect on the expression of the trichodermin biosynthetic genes and on tomato seedlings,” Toxins, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1220–1232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Degenkolb, R. Dieckmann, K. F. Nielsen et al., “The Trichoderma brevicompactum clade: a separate lineage with new species, new peptaibiotics, and mycotoxins,” Mycological Progress, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 177–219, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. L. Bertagnolli, S. Daly, and J. B. Sinclair, “Antimycotic compounds from the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and its antagonist Trichoderma harzianum,” Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 146, no. 2-3, pp. 131–135, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. P. Wang, B. Q. Zheng, Z. Z. Zhou, and C. L. Zhang, “Optimization of fermentation conditions for trichodermin by the mutant strain UL 60-1 Trichoderma. Taxi,” Chinese Journal of Biological Control, vol. 26, pp. 486–491, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  16. W. Zheng, Y. Zhao, X. Zheng et al., “Production of antioxidant and antitumor metabolites by submerged cultures of Inonotus obliquus cocultured with Phellinus punctatus,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 157–167, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. X. Liang, Y. B. Li, J. W. Xu et al., “Enhanced biosynthetic gene expressions and production of ganoderic acids in static liquid culture of Ganoderma lucidum under phenobarbital induction,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1367–1374, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. I. Rabea, M. E. I. Badawy, W. Steurbaut, and C. V. Stevens, “In vitro assessment of N-(benzyl)chitosan derivatives against some plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 237–245, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. P. Shentu, Y. J. Shi, and X. P. Yu, “Identification and quantification of trichodermin in fermentation by GC,” Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 43, no. 22, pp. 1755–1756, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. G. Berger, Aroma Biotechnology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
  21. F. Vinale, E. L. Ghisalberti, K. Sivasithamparam et al., “Factors affecting the production of Trichoderma harzianum secondary metabolites during the interaction with different plant pathogens,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 705–711, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Serrano-Carreón, C. Flores, B. Rodríguez, and E. Galindo, “Rhizoctonia solani, an elicitor of 6-pentyl-α-pyrone production by Trichoderma harzianum in a two liquid phases, extractive fermentation system,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 1403–1406, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. E. Harman, “Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp,” Phytopathology, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 190–194, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. M. Abdel-Fattah, Y. M. Shabana, A. E. Ismail, and Y. M. Rashad, “Trichoderma harzianum: a biocontrol agent against Bipolaris oryzae,” Mycopathologia, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Omero, J. Inbar, V. Rocha-Ramirez, A. Herrera-Estrella, I. Chet, and B. A. Horwitz, “G protein activators and cAMP promote mycoparasitic behaviour in Trichoderma harzianum,” Mycological Research, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 1637–1642, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Reithner, K. Brunner, R. Schuhmacher et al., “The G protein α subunit Tga1 of Trichoderma atroviride is involved in chitinase formation and differential production of antifungal metabolites,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 749–760, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. Sivasithamparam and E. L. Ghisalberti, Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1998.
  28. A. Wiest, D. Grzegorski, B. W. Xu et al., “Identification of peptaibols from Trichoderma virens and cloning of a peptaibol synthetase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 23, pp. 20862–20868, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus