Research Article | Open Access
Transcriptional Regulation of Δ6-Desaturase by Peroxisome Proliferative-Activated Receptor δ Agonist in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells: Role of MEK/ERK1/2 Pathway
The Δ6-desaturase (Δ6D), also known as fatty acid desaturase 2, is a regulatory enzyme in de novo fatty acid synthesis, which has been linked to obesity and diabetes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of peroxisome proliferative-activated receptor δ (PPARδ) agonist and MEK/ERK1/2-dependent pathway on the expression of Δ6D in human pancreatic carcinoma cell line PANC-1. PANC-1 cells cultured in RPMI-1640 were exposed to the commonly used ERK1/2 pathway inhibitor PD98059 and PPARδ agonist GW0742. Changes in mRNA and protein expression of Δ6D were then determined using real-time RT-PCR and Western blot, respectively. The expression of Δ6D () increased following treatment with PPARδ agonist both at mRNA and protein levels, whereas no significant change was observed after treatment with MEK/ERK1/2 pathway inhibitor. It was also found that the increase in the expression of Δ6D in response to GW0742 was significantly inhibited by PD98059 (>40%, ) or EGF receptor-selective inhibitor AG1478 (>25%, ) pretreatment. PPARδ and MEK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways affect differentially the expression of Δ6D in pancreatic cancer cells. Furthermore, there may be an inhibitory crosstalk between these two regulatory pathways on the mRNA expression of Δ6D and subsequently on Δ6D protein expression.
Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies indicate the critical role of fatty acids in cell membrane fluidity, which in turn affect ligand binding and cellular signal transduction of surface receptors and G-proteins [1–3]. This role has been demonstrated by the fact that the altered levels of fatty acid desaturase enzymes are associated with various human diseases like diabetes and atherosclerosis [4, 5]. Studies have shown that lipotoxicity of human pancreatic islets, which is attributed to accumulation of saturated fatty acids, is one of the important causes of dysregulated insulin secretion and apoptosis of pancreatic β-cell [6, 7]. In contrast to saturated fatty acids, unsaturated fatty acids play a key role in survival of the pancreatic β-cell [8, 9]. The membrane-bound enzyme Δ6 fatty acid desaturase (Δ6D), encoded by the fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) gene, is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of unsaturated fatty acids. FADS2-deficient mouse model has revealed that Δ6D is the main enzyme in in vivo production of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) .
The delta isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) δ is a family of nuclear receptors regulating the expression of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism. Previous studies have reported that both PUFA and PPARα agonist response elements are present in the FADS2; however, no exact region that responds independently to PPARδ has yet been identified . A high affinity synthetic PPARδ agonist has been shown to modulate fatty acid metabolic pathways, particularly those involving n-6 PUFA desaturation . However, the exact functional targets in these pathways have also not yet been detected.
PPARδ like other nuclear receptors may be affected by other signaling pathways, and this crosstalk might modulate the activity of these kinds of receptors. We recently demonstrated that the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) MEK/ERK1/2 signaling inhibition could alter the expression level of Δ6D in hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 . It has previously been shown that inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling had no apparent effect on PPARδ agonist-mediated increase in glucose uptake in cultured human skeletal muscle, whereas PPARδ agonist increased both phosphorylation and expression of ERK 1/2. Thus, it is possible that both Erk1/2 signaling and PPARδ are involved in a crosstalk contributing to the regulation of Δ6D expression.
Several lines of evidence suggest that PPARδ activity and Erk1/2 signaling play important role in the regulation of pancreatic β-cells function. In the present study in human pancreatic carcinoma cell line PANC-1, Δ6D expression was tested for responsiveness to the synthetic PPARδ agonist GW0742, under either MEK/ERK1/2 or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway blockade.
2. Materials and Methods
Cell culture materials, media, and FBS were obtained from Sigma Chemicals Company (St. Louis, Mo, USA). GW0742 and PD98059 were purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). PANC-1 cell line was obtained from the Pasteur Institute Culture Collection in Tehran, Iran. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.
2.2. Cell Culture
PANC-1 cells were grown in RPMI1640 containing 10% FBS, L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% humidity. The subcultures with less than 8 passages were used for drug treatment experiments. The cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105/well in a 6-well plate. After allowing the cells to attach overnight, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing ±PPARδ agonist GW0742, specific inhibitor of the MEK/ERK1/2 PD98059, or selective inhibitor of EGFR AG1478. Following 48 h incubation, culture medium was removed; the cell monolayer was washed and collected for mRNA and protein expression analysis.
2.3. Real-Time RT-PCR Analysis
Total RNAs were purified with QIAamp RNA mini kit with a DNase I treatment (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNAs were then resuspended in 50 μL of RNase-free water and stored at –80°C. For cDNA synthesis, RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed with a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR; Roche, Hertfordshire, UK).
FADS2 primers  for real-time PCR were designed to amplify a segment in the cDNA sequence as follows: forward primer TTACAACATCACCAAATGGTCCAT, the intronspanning reverse primer GAAGGCATCCGTTGCATCTT, and the labeled probe CCAGCGGGTCATCGGGCACTAC. The TaqMan probes were labeled with a reporter dye (FAM) on its 5′ end and a quencher dye (TAMRA) on its 3′ end. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was measured using the predeveloped TaqMan Assay. Real-time PCR reactions were performed on an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System according to the standard protocols of the manufacturer. Samples were assayed in triplicates.
Quantification was performed according to the relative standard curve method described in the PE User bulletin no. 2. Quantity of FADS2 mRNA was divided by GAPDH mRNA content, and the normalized quantity expressed as a unitless number, and all quantities are expressed as an x-fold difference relative to a calibrator.
2.4. Western Blot Analysis
Cells were washed twice with PBS and placed in lysis buffer containing antiprotease cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, IN, USA). Protein concentration in the supernatant of lysed cells was measured using Bradford’s colorimetric method with reference to BSA standards (Bio-Rad). Western blot analysis was performed according to the standard procedures (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). Briefly, 30 μg of whole cell extract was separated by SDS PAGE. After electrotransfer to Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), the blots were blocked with 3% skim milk and subjected to Western blot analysis with either polyclonal anti-Δ6D or anti-β-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Immunoreactive bands were detected by enhanced ECL (Amersham Bioscience). For quantification, the developed films were scanned and pixel intensity of Δ6D signal was normalized against β-actin for each sample.
2.5. Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as mean ± SE. Experiments were repeated three times in duplicate. Statistically significant differences in mean values between groups were assessed by ANOVA test with post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. A value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were carried out using SPSS for windows version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
To define if there is a connection between PPARδ and ERK1/2 MAPK signaling pathway on the expression of Δ6D enzyme, PANC-1 cells were treated with a specific PPARδ agonist (GW0742), a selective inhibitor of MAP kinase (PD98059), or a EGF receptor-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (AG1478).
To optimize the assay, cultured PANC-1 cells were incubated with different concentrations of GW0742 (0–20 μM), PD98059 (0–40 μM), or AG1478 (0–10 μM) 48 h at 37°C (Figure 1). At 1 μM concentration, GW0742 induced no apparent effect on Δ6D mRNA expression. At 10–20 μM of GW0742, Δ6D expression was significantly upregulated (>4.3-fold, ) in PANC-1 cells. The treatment with all three doses of PD98059 and AG1478 induced no significant changes in the mRNA expression of Δ6D compared with that of the control.
The selected doses were then studied on the both mRNA and protein expression of Δ6D simultaneously (Figures 2 and 3). Similarly, treatment of PANC-1 cell cultures with GW0742 significantly increased the protein expression level of Δ6D (2.2-fold, ). There was also no significant effect on cellular Δ6D protein expression following PD98059 incubation (Figure 3). Comparison of control with the combined drug condition showed a significant increase only in the mRNA expression of Δ6D (2.7-fold, ). It was also found that the increase in expression of Δ6D in response to the PPARδ agonist was significantly inhibited (>40%, ) by PD98059 pretreatment. EGF receptor-selective inhibitor AG1478 also significantly reduced stimulatory effect of GW0742 on mRNA (26%, ) and protein (32%, ) expression of Δ6D. However, the inhibitory effect of AG1478 at the protein level was very modest when compared to the PD98059.
Regulation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in response to the glucose consumption is mediated by insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells . Several previous studies in pancreatic islets and glucose-induced beta-(INS-1)-cell have shown that fatty acids could modulate insulin resistance [17–19] by inducing a number of unique responses such as resistance to cytokine-induced β-cell destruction, altered insulin gene expression, and controlling proinflammatory mediators derived from n-6 PUFAs . In a previous study, we suggested that Δ6D may act as potential mediator of the effects of ERK1/2 signaling on hepatic fatty acid composition . Krämer et al. have reported that PPARδ agonists could increase phosphorylation and expression of MAPK ERK1/2 by 2.2-fold. According to this evidence, it seems that MAPK cascade signaling could be modulated by PPARδ activity.
In this study, it was demonstrated that PPARδ agonist GW0742 could markedly increase Δ6D gene and protein expression in pancreatic carcinoma cell line PANC-1. Accordingly, Roberts et al.  have shown that PPARδ agonist could increase unsaturated fatty acid products of the Δ6D in liver, skeletal muscle, blood serum, and white adipose tissue from obese mice. These results confirm an earlier study which has shown that FADS2 may contain peroxisome proliferator response elements which are under positive control of peroxisome proliferators .
In the study by Cohen  and colleagues, it has been shown that PPARδ and PUFA play a key role in insulin secretion from isolated islet cells and INS-1E. According to this study, high glucose level in islet cell could increase the release of n-6 PUFA, which acts as endogenous ligand for PPARδ. According to our present findings, it is thus possible that the PPARδ-mediated general response of β-cell to increased glucose level is coupled to the production of unsaturated fatty acids via enzymatic Δ6 desaturation. Taken together, these results signify the role of PPARδ and Δ6 fatty acid desaturation in potency of insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cell.
Our findings on PANC-1 cultures incubated with MEK/ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 showed no apparent change in Δ6D mRNA and protein expression compared to untreated control cells. In contrast with these observations, our results in human hepatoblastoma (HepG2) cells indicated that the expression level of Δ6D was significantly increased in the presence of MEK/ERK1/2 inhibitor. The differences in our results may be due to either a cell-type-specific effect or different sensitivities in methods of measurement and use of relative RT-PCR versus real-time RT-PCR.
We also demonstrated that treatment with both ERK1/2 inhibitor and EGFR inhibitor remarkably downregulated GW0742-induced Δ6D mRNA and protein expression. In spite of comparable levels of Δ6D mRNA expression, EGFR inhibitor had less suppressive effect on PPARδ agonist-mediated induction of Δ6D protein expression than ERK1/2 inhibitor. This difference may be related to additional changes in associated downstream signaling pathways, like PI3K-Akt [22, 23]. So it could be hypothesized that there is increased protein stability or decreased protein degradation in response to inhibition of PI3K, which is downstream of EGFR. Slowed EGF-induced protein degradation following inhibition of PI3K signaling has previously been reported .
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first study to examine the combined effect of PPARδ agonist and ERK1/2 blockade on the gene and protein expression of fatty acid Δ6D. We used PANC-1 pancreatic tumor cells which are well-characterized human-derived cells for studying human pancreatic cells in vitro . Based on our result, we could conclude that EGFR signaling pathways maybe involved in the suppression of Δ6D expression; however, the relationship between this pathway and PPARδ remains to be investigated.
Our study showed that PPARδ and ERK1/2 MAPK signaling pathways affect the gene expression of Δ6D in pancreatic carcinoma cell line PANC-1. Furthermore, a possible inhibitory effect of ERK1/2 MAPK signaling on PPARδ activity may serve to coordinate Δ6 desaturation of fatty acids in pancreatic cells.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
This study was financially supported by grants from the Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The authors acknowledge the Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
- A. Bordoni, N. M. Di, F. Danesi, and P. L. Biagi, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids: from diet to binding to ppars and other nuclear receptors,” Genes and Nutrition, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–106, 2006.
- M. T. Nakamura and T. Y. Nara, “Structure, function, and dietary regulation of Δ6, Δ5, and Δ9 desaturases,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 24, pp. 345–376, 2004.
- D. Wei, J. Li, M. Shen et al., “Cellular production of n-3 PUFAs and reduction of n-6-to-n-3 ratios in the pancreatic β-cells and islets enhance insulin secretion and confer protection against cytokine-induced cell death,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 471–478, 2010.
- D. M. Merino and D. W. Ma, “Genetic variation in lipid desaturases and its impact on the development of human disease,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 9, article 63, 2010.
- J. L. Sepulveda, Y. C. Tanhehco, M. Frey et al., “Variation in human erythrocyte membrane unsaturated fatty acids,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2010.
- R. Lupi, F. Dotta, L. Marselli et al., “Prolonged exposure to free fatty acids has cytostatic and pro-apoptotic effects on human pancreatic islets: evidence that β-cell death is caspase mediated, partially dependent on ceramide pathway, and Bcl-2 regulated,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1437–1442, 2002.
- K. Maedler, G. A. Spinas, D. Dyntar, W. Moritz, N. Kaiser, and M. Y. Donath, “Distinct effects of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids on β-cell turnover and function,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2001.
- E. Karaskov, C. Scott, L. Zhang, T. Teodoro, M. Ravazzola, and A. Volchuk, “Chronic palmitate but not oleate exposure induces endoplasmic reticulum stress, which may contribute to INS-1 pancreatic β-cell apoptosis,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 7, pp. 3398–3407, 2006.
- S. Piro, M. Anello, C. Di Pietro et al., “Chronic exposure to free fatty acids or high glucose induces apoptosis in rat pancreatic islets: possible role of oxidative stress,” Metabolism, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1340–1347, 2002.
- W. Stoffel, B. Holz, B. Jenke et al., “Δ6-desaturase (FADS2) deficiency unveils the role of ω3- and ω6-polyunsaturated fatty acids,” EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 2281–2292, 2008.
- Y. Kawashima, K. Musoh, and H. Kozuka, “Peroxisome proliferators enhance linoleic acid metabolism in rat liver. Increased biosynthesis of ω6 polyunsaturated fatty acids,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 16, pp. 9170–9175, 1990.
- L. D. Roberts, D. G. Hassall, D. A. Winegar, J. N. Haselden, A. W. Nicholls, and J. L. Griffin, “Increased hepatic oxidative metabolism distinguishes the action of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ from peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in the ob/ob mouse,” Genome Medicine, vol. 1, no. 12, article 115, 2009.
- N. Saliani, M. Darabi, B. Yousefi et al., “PPARγ agonist-induced alterations in Δ6-desaturase and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1: role of MEK/ERK1/2 pathway,” World Journal of Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 220–225, 2013.
- D. K. Krämer, L. Al-Khalili, S. Perrini et al., “Direct activation of glucose transport in primary human myotubes after activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1157–1163, 2005.
- R. K. McNamara, Y. Liu, R. Jandacek, T. Rider, and P. Tso, “The aging human orbitofrontal cortex: decreasing polyunsaturated fatty acid composition and associated increases in lipogenic gene expression and stearoyl-CoA desaturase activity,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 78, no. 4-5, pp. 293–304, 2008.
- C. Bouché, S. Serdy, C. R. Kahn, and A. B. Goldfine, “The cellular fate of glucose and its relevance in type 2 diabetes,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 807–830, 2004.
- M. Petersen, H. Pedersen, A. Major-Pedersen, T. Jensen, and P. Marckmann, “Effect of fish oil versus corn oil supplementation on LDL and HDL subclasses in type 2 diabetic patients,” Diabetes Care, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1704–1708, 2002.
- Y. Suresh and U. N. Das, “Protective action of arachidonic acid against alloxan-induced cytotoxicity and diabetes mellitus,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2001.
- Y. Suresh and U. N. Das, “Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and chemically induced diabetes mellitus: effect of ω-6 fatty acids,” Nutrition, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 93–114, 2003.
- A. P. Simopoulos, “Importance of the ratio of ω-6/ω-3 essential fatty acids: evolutionary aspects,” World review of nutrition and dietetics, vol. 92, pp. 1–22, 2003.
- G. Cohen, Y. Riahi, O. Shamni et al., “Role of lipid peroxidation and PPAR-δ in amplifying glucose-stimulated insulin secretion,” Diabetes, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2830–2842, 2011.
- V. N. Ivanov and T. K. Hei, “Combined treatment with EGFR inhibitors and arsenite upregulated apoptosis in human EGFR-positive melanomas: a role of suppression of the PI3K-AKT pathway,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 616–626, 2005.
- M. Sibilia, A. Fleischmann, A. Behrens et al., “The EGF receptor provides an essential survival signal for SOS-dependent skin tumor development,” Cell, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2000.
- J. M. Backer, “Phosphoinositide 3-kinases and the regulation of vesicular trafficking,” Molecular Cell Biology Research Communications, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 193–204, 2000.
- M. Lieber, J. A. Mazzetta, W. Nelson-Rees, M. Kaplan, and G. Todaro, “Establishment of a continuous tumor cell line (PANC-1) from a human carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 741–747, 1975.
Copyright © 2013 Maryam Darabi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.